The identity of the God who knows me


, , ,

The Angel of Yahveh found Hagar near a spring in the desert; it was the spring that is beside the road to Shur.  And he said, “Hagar, servant of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?”

            “I’m running away from my mistress, Sarai,” she answered.

Then the Angel of Yahveh told her, “Go back to your mistress and submit to her.”  The Angel added, “I will so increase your descendants that they will be too numerous to count.”

The Angel of Yahveh also said to her: “You are now with child and you will have a son.  You shall name him Ishmael, for Yahveh has heard of your misery.  He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone and everyone’s hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers.”

She gave this name to Yahveh who spoke to her: “You are the God who sees me,” for she said, “I have now seen the One who sees me.”  That is why the well was called Beer Lahai Roi; it is still there, between Kadesh and Bered.

So Hagar bore Abram a son, and Abram gave the name Ishmael to the son she had borne.”[1]



Aristotle held that at the center of all things there is a God, that he is the Prime Mover and First Great Cause of all things.  His God, in order to be God, had to be perfect in all ways.  It could not “do” things which would cause it to abandon its perfection.  Nor could it contemplate things lesser than itself, as that would demean the god and would be a rebuke of its godly perfection.  For Aristotle there was nothing higher than mind, therefore he concluded that God can only be Mind Thinking Itself.  How does such a God set the world in motion?  According to Aristotle its motive force is its pure and unassailable perfection:  the universe turns in adoration of the divine perfection.

Aristotle’s God evoked a perfection of form, particularly in the realm of the heavenly bodies.   There was an enduring prejudice in the ancient world that the motion of the planets must be, by definition, circular, not elliptical, as the planets are in the heavens and belong to the divine.  [The circle is perfect motion around a center at rest.  The finite displacement of the center in the ellipse implies unrest and finitude, not characteristics of perfection.]

Aristotle’s God also claimed a perfection of content, as it contemplated only that which is highest, which is Mind, which is Itself.  To contemplate what is other than itself would violate its perfection, and to act on behalf of what is other than itself would be a supreme self-sacrifice.  Aristotle could not have contemplated the possibility of a God that would sacrifice itself on behalf of what is other than itself, as, for instance, in an extraordinary act of  love.  A purely rational God can act only according to what is necessary, and love is not an expression of necessity.  Love is a free gift, an expression of something beyond necessity.  Love is something which comes from a free person, from a consciousness which is able to choose to act in a fashion which is a sacrifice of self.  Such an act would have deconstituted Aristotle’s god.

Akin to Aristotle there have been many philosophies in recent centuries falling under the heading of Deism.  These theories also consider God to be a depersonalized Power or Force.  They may expect that their God is responsible for Creation, but, in their view, this God is disinterested, aloof from history.  For some, this God is like the clockmaker who assembles a mechanism, winds it up, and lets it go.  Such a God has no reason to make a special revelation of itself to an individual man or woman.  Deism takes no part in “revealed religion.”  Deists do not look to any of the Scriptures which portray God as intervening in human history or communing with specific individuals.  The Deist wants a cosmology in which all truth is accessible purely through reason.

The American founding fathers are often labeled Deists, but they were mostly Unitarians, a religion which in the 18th century still envisioned a God who is active in history, who is the source of Providence, and who is also a provider of justice and the hope of an afterlife.  Coming out of the Age of Reason they wanted God to be God [to have a will and to be capable of independent action], but they wanted him to be rational.  They felt that the human soul was not fallen but neutral, neither good nor bad, therefore free to act and due to be judged by its deeds.  Consequently, they were happy to see Christ simply as a moral teacher, not as their Redeemer.  Theologically they were not so far from Islam.

Whether it be Aristotle or the Unitarian or the Muslim, it is not so difficult to imagine that the aloof God is the cause of an order in the universe which is both beautiful and moral.   Therefore their God can be a force for justice in the world, so that ultimately the sheep and the goats will be separated and history will be worthwhile.  But it is not easy for these philosophers to imagine the aloof and rational God entering into history in specific acts where God conducts himself as an individual person, where his will and consciousness intersect with the will and consciousness of specific individual human beings.  Nor can they fathom such a thing as the incarnation of infinite God in the finite body and self-directed will of a human person.




YHVH is the four letter equivalent of the Hebrew tetragrammaton   יהוה.  This name of God is variously pronounced Yahveh or Yahweh.  In the Hebrew Scriptures it is this God who revealed himself to Abraham and to Hagar.  He is more complex than all other gods.

No one has seen the God of Abraham face to face, yet he penetrates into human history.  He is above all things, yet he is active within space and time.  He has configured history to make possible the knowledge of himself in individual experience.  He is infinite yet makes himself known through the being and finite activity of the Logos.

The Logos translates casually as the “Word.”  However, its root significance in Greek is as “the fountain of all order and ratio in the world.”  It is a massive word with a meaning close to that of the “Tao.”  In the Chinese New Testament, the Logos is translated as the Tao.

John identifies Yeshua as the incarnation of the Logos and tells us clearly that in the beginning the Logos created the world.    The book of John opens with this analysis:

In the beginning was the Logos [the Tao], and the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God.  He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.  In him was life, and that life was the light of men…

The Logos became flesh and made his dwelling among us.  We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth…. No one has ever seen God, but the One and Only Son of God who is at the Father’s side has made him known.”   John 1.1-4,14,18

The God of Israel has revealed himself in past times through his prophets but in this time through his Son.  So says the writer of the Letter to the Hebrews, and he continues by saying,

“The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word.”  Hebrews 1.3

From the earliest days of the history of Israel, Yahveh entered into space time and, in the figure of the Angel of Yahveh, appeared to Abraham, to Hagar, to Isaac, to Jacob, to Moses, and to many others.  The purpose of the shema, asserting, “Hear O Israel, Yahveh our God, Yahveh is One,” is not to reduce Yahveh to a simple monad but to affirm that he who both enters the world and is above all worlds is yet One.  The very name YHVH is an assertion that the actions of God are not an aberration from his character but are the exact expression of his character.

The God of Israel first revealed his eternal name to Moses.  When God spoke to Moses on Mount Horeb and told him that he was to return to Egypt and lead his people out of slavery, Moses asked God to reveal his name.  Moses saw that he was not in the presence of an aloof prime mover: he was in the presence of an in-historical God, a divine Person who entered into human history on the grounds of his own creative desire.  God then spoke his name to Moses, “Ehyeh asher ehyeh.” “I am and shall be that which I am.”

And God [Elohim] said unto Moses, “Ehyeh asher ehyeh”; and he said, “Thou shalt say unto the children of Israel, ‘EHYEH has sent me unto you.’”  And God said moreover unto Moses: “Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel: “YHVH, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me unto you; this is my name forever and this is my memorial unto all generations.  Go and gather together the elders of Israel, and say unto them: YHVH, the God of your fathers, has appeared unto me….”

EHYEH is the first person expression which God says of himself. The phrase, “Ehyeh asher ehyeh,” translates as “I am [now and on into the future] that which I am.”  “YHVH” is the third person expression, which is ours to speak: “He is and shall be that which he is.”  Therefore it is understood that in saying the name YHVH we are saying, “He is, now and forevermore, that which he is.”  Or, more specifically, “He is and ever shall be [in his actions] that which he is [in his essential being.]”

By this name Yahveh affirms the eternity of his essential being and affirms that all his deeds are consistent with his essential being … even as he enters history through the finite actions of Yeshua the incarnation of the Logos and our eternal king.  This meaning of the name YHVH was carried forward when Christ said to the Pharisees, “Before Abraham was, I AM,” and was echoed by John in the book of Revelation when he wrote,

“Grace be to you and peace from he who is, who was, and who is to come.” Rev. 1.4

In Yeshua the Logos became flesh and made his dwelling among us.  In Yeshua Yahveh became flesh and made his dwelling among us.

The being of Yeshua reveals the being of the Father.  In Yeshua it is seen that Yahveh is a free agent who acts rationally and justly and is also free to reach out to his creation in irrational acts of love.  Throughout the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures Yahveh enters history on behalf of his people, healing and instructing those who seek the knowledge of him.  Through Yeshua he has established the grounds upon which the wounds of human rebellion are healed.  In the letter to the Colossians Paul wrote,

“He [Yeshua] is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.  For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.  He is before all things, and in him all things hold together…For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.”[2]



There is another vision of the world, a vision which claims its origins in the 7th century A.D. as a “new and final revelation” of God to men, ostensibly through Muhammad, a man who considered himself a prophet.  Muhammad claimed to receive revelations from the supreme God through the angel Gabriel.  He called the supreme God by the name Allah, a name which had historically been attached to the chief god of a polytheistic godhead worshiped at the Qa’aba in Mecca.  Companions of Muhammad wrote down the revelations, and these records were compiled shortly after his death to become the Quran.  Muhammad claimed that Allah is the God of Abraham and Moses, and that they were, like himself, prophets of Allah.

However, the followers of Allah do not recognize YHVH as a name of God, nor do they recognize the role of Israel in bringing into the world the ground of human redemption through Yeshua.   Abraham and Moses both saw the coming of a Messiah out of Israel.  The followers of Allah do not recognize either the divinity of Yeshua or the critical role of his sacrifice on the cross, since they believe that the unity of Allah is a unity of form, and that the purity of Allah is partly a function of his abstinence from the mundane.  This does not allow, by their thinking, either the existence of  the Logos or that it be made flesh.  The Dome of the Rock, on the Temple Mount, is covered with slogans declaring that Allah can have no Son.

Muslims claim that the revelations to Muhammad supersede the revelations of Yeshua.  This would seem to be an oblique claim that Yeshua was either ignorant or not telling the truth, since Yeshua clearly presented himself as uniquely begotten of God, as the very presence and agency of God on earth, and made it clear that he had come with the express purpose of going to the cross to redeem mankind from the curse of death.   The actual claim of Muslims is that all the texts of the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures have been corrupted.

Muslims, followers of Allah and Muhammad, believe that suspended between two poles, a good life and adherence to the Five Pillars of Islam,[3] hangs the hope [not the guarantee] that they will spend eternity in Paradise.  [There is no evidence that they intend to share in the promise to Abraham, the ancient promise that the people of God will live in the land of promise under the rule of Yeshua the Messiah of  Israel.]

In this way Islam is much like Catholicism.  Catholics are amillennialists.  Amillennialists do not look for Christ to return and rule [for a millennium] in a brick and mortar rule on earth.  Amillenialists like John Calvin thought it would be “beneath” God to have a kingdom on earth, therefore beneath God to fulfill literally his promises to Abraham.

Catholics also believe that salvation is a treasure suspended between two poles, the deeds of a good life and adherence to the Sacraments[4] of the Catholic institution.  In Islam and in Catholicism, decisive power over individual access to Paradise lies in the hands of the institution.




We see easily that as the perception of God changes, so is altered every possibility of the nature of the encounter between man and God, the most radical variant introducing itself when one abandons the gods which originate in the imagination and seeks the God who truly knows our face.

Entry into the kingdom of Yeshua is not governed by any religious institution or cultural structure.  The individual person comes to Yeshua in absolute independence and stands alone before God.  The one who seeks Yahveh is called to kneel and recognize the sovereignty of Yahveh and acknowledge that Yeshua is Lord, king upon the eternal and heavenly throne.  Implicit in coming before the heavenly throne is the recognition of the Messiah’s work at the cross and our own need of redemption.  A price had to be paid for human rebellion and Yeshua paid that price.  Even more, a way had to be made for the transformation of our rebellious nature into a spiritual nature capable of fealty to the  person and expectations of a spiritual and holy God.

In Yeshua, Yahveh calls mankind to himself, calls us to a spiritual birth, without which we remain mere observers.  Yahveh is not looking for observers.  He is looking for participants, subjects of the realm, warriors ready to stand for the truth, ready to own the light in a world of darkness.  The “belief” which Christians bandy about is far more than a credo.  It is meant to be total immersion and surrender to the Sovereignty of Yeshua.

Many claim to find satisfaction far short of the all-consuming call of Yahveh.  There are certainly those who have convinced themselves that worlds can orbit in perfect motion and eyes can see and tongues can sing, all without the hand of any Creator, men born with no purpose but to perpetuate their species.  But, these aside, most men have felt the world to be unintelligible without the presence of God, and have found it unlivable without the hope of making appeal to God.

The motive to come into the presence of God is strong and amply recorded throughout our history.  We know that the knowledge of God is often limited by the prevalent religious dogmas of the culture into which we are born.  But we seek God, not to satisfy the demands of culture, but to satisfy the demands of the heart.  Therefore the person who truly seeks to be known by God will reach beyond the pleasantries of common dogma and will search to know if there is or is not a God who sees and hears and answers the call of the heart.

Some are certainly more than satisfied by Aristotle’s God.  The appeal of a distant God is that there is no place for divine judgment upon mankind, nor is there reason to think that man is fallen.  We obviously are not considered to be made “in the image” of such a mechanistic God.  We may imagine that our ancestors started as specks in the primeval slime.  Therefore whatever we are at this moment can only be considered as an amazing accomplishment.  There is no room for judgment nor is there any divine being capable of inspecting or judging us.  Nor does this god require fealty of any kind.  This god demands nothing, therefore leaving man autonomous, owner of complete liberty.

Allah, the God of Islam, does not challenge the integrity of man in his natural state.  Allah does not see man as fallen and in need of redemption.  He only expects a man to do his best and to observe the Five Pillars of Islam.  Therefore Allah asks fealty but does not challenge man to recognize a need for spiritual transformation. has a very informative article on Khilafah [the caliphate or vicegerency of man on earth], in which it states:

“Islam does not contribute to any theory of the ‘fall of Adam’ symbolizing the fall of man.  There was no ‘fall’ at all in that sense.  Man was created for the purpose of acting as vicegerent on the earth and he came to the world to fulfill this mission.  It represents the rise of man to a new assignment, his tryst with destiny, and not a fall.  According to the Quran, ‘Satan caused them both to deflect therefrom.’  Both were held responsible for the act, both repented their transgression, and both were forgiven.  They entered the world without any stigma of original sin on their soul.  Human nature is pure and good.  Man has been created in the best of all forms….Man has not been totally protected against error.  This would involve negation of the freedom of choice.  He may commit errors; his redemption lies in his realization of those errors, in seeking repentance and in turning back to the Right Path.”

In the Hebrew Scriptures, to which Islam refers [while claiming that they have been corrupted], there is no record that Adam or Eve ever repented of their rebellion.  Even if they did repent and were forgiven, there is a question of justice yet to be resolved.  Is simple repentance adequate to restore the rebel to the good grace of a holy God?  Is there no punishment for sin?  If not, then let sin begin, that repentance and grace may flow more freely?  Does not the God who created mankind with the greatest expectations — that we should live and act after the manner of God himself — is he not justified in demanding that, in the face of such rebellion, his continued devotion to the prospects of man on earth must be justified by some cover, some antidote to the seed of unbridled liberty now planted in his creation?  Does not the sacrifice of Yeshua on the cross reveal to us the gravity of God’s law and the depth of his expectations in us?  Does he not amplify his holiness and the honor of his expectations by sending his unique Messiah into the world to bring to mankind the possibility of spiritual transformation?

It is apparent that for Islam man does not need transformation so much as he needs simple upkeep.  Islam does not have absolute laws.  Its morality is greatly situational.  There are many situations in which the Muslim is allowed to deceive or even kill if it is for the sake of the advancement of Islam.  In this they are very much like the Jesuits who are free to act outside divine law if it is for the sake of the welfare of the Papacy.

It also appears that the righteous life of the Muslim individual is dependent on the context of an Islamic social structure within which he is able to pray regularly, tithe, etc., i.e. a society to which his good deeds have meaning.  Furthermore, the Muslim’s divine mission of vicegerency calls him to establish the rule of Allah over the earth, by force if necessary.  This subject is expanded in the above-quoted article:

“The Khilafa [vicegerency] is a common leadership for all the Muslims in the world.  Its role is to establish the laws of the Islamic Shariah and to carry the Dawa of Islam to the world.  The pathetic situation of the Muslims today, due to the absence of a Khilafa, is proof of the saying of the Prophet: ‘Islam and government are twin brothers.  Neither of the two can be perfect without the other.  Islam is like a great structure and government is its guardian.  A building without a foundation crashes down and without a guardian is pilfered and robbed out.’  The state of the Muslims today cannot be helped unless we work to implement in entirety the systems of Islam.  Only then can the justice of Allah the Exalted be brought to bear on earth.”

Then the one who seeks God in the name of Allah does not necessarily come in repentance or in search of rescue from a fallen nature.  Islam allows that human nature is undamaged.  What is required is a good life and simple fealty to the five pillars of Islam.  1.] to recite the Shahada, “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger.” 2.] regular prayer five times per day 3.] to tithe 4.] to fast during Ramadan 5.] to make the pilgrimage to Mecca.

Is the petitioner then known by Allah?    It may be of the character ascribed to Allah that he be conscious of individual human beings and even pass ultimate judgment upon them, but Allah, for the Muslim, is unknowable, aloof, and would not enter into communication with the heart of an individual.  According to the Islamic scholar al-Faruqi:

“He [Allah] does not reveal himself to anyone in any way.  Allah reveals only his will.  One of the prophets asked Allah to reveal himself and Allah told him, ‘No, it is not possible for me to reveal myself to anyone.’… This is Allah’s will and that is all we have, and we have it in perfection in the Quran…God does not reveal himself to anyone.  Christians talk about the revelation of God himself –by God of God – but that is the great difference between Christianity and Islam.”[5]

Then there is no personal relationship between Allah and the individual, for Allah does not act as person.  Nor is there any expectation that the individual will radically open his heart and person to Allah.  The personality of the petitioner is not of great significance to Allah.  What matters is his submission, which is the meaning of “Islam.”




Traditional Judaism pursues the God of Israel as he is made known in the revelations to Moses and the prophets.  Traditional Judaism approaches YHVH through the study of the Hebrew Scriptures and through prayer and worship, both public and private.  They hold to the notion that the God who revealed himself through Israel is characteristically the God of the genetic people of Israel, and more recently of the geopolitical nation of Israel.  Modern exponents of Judaism hold that you cannot belong to the God of Israel except through popular inclusion into the people of Israel.

[In this they are like the Catholics and the Muslims, where one enters the faith through the socio-ecclesiastical structure.  Pope Francis claimed quite recently, “It is a dangerous temptation to believe that one can have “a personal, direct, immediate relationship with Jesus Christ without communion with and the mediation of the church.”  This of course is a complete rebuke of all that Christ has said in the New Testament, but Catholics do not consider Scripture to have higher authority than the pronouncements of the church.]

For traditional Rabbinic Judaism, the interventions of YHVH in history are on behalf of the historic people of Israel, not necessarily for anyone else.

Modern Judaism has abandoned most of this traditional faith which centered on the revelations of Yahveh to Moses and the prophets.  Instead there is widespread preoccupation with Qabala.  This is an exaltation of a completely depersonalized god accessible through gnostic insight and through communication with spirits.  It presumes to access the power of God without concern for the person of God as he has made himself known in the history of the people of Israel.  In Qabalistic Judaism neither the person of God nor the persona of him who seeks God is of any relevance.



In Yeshua we find the person of Yahveh.  In Yeshua Yahveh  enters history to rescue us from mindless rebellion.  The overwhelming gravity of that intervention is revealed to us at the foot of the cross.  If we cannot meet him there, we cannot meet him.

How do we know that his acts are true?  As Yeshua remarked, Only the true shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.  The hired hand sees the wolf coming and flees.  He, the true shepherd, is the one who knows us:

“I am the good shepherd.  I know my own, and my own know me.”   John 10.14

How does he know us intimately?  This was the concern of the disciples as Yeshua explained to them his crucifixion and coming resurrection.  At that time he explained to them the coming miracle of Pentecost, a plan prepared over centuries, that the Spirit of Yeshua would come to rest in the heart of every person who opens his heart to transformation, to spiritual birth:

“I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor to be with you forever – the Spirit of truth.  The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him.  But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you.  I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you.  Before long the world will not see me anymore, but you will see me.  Because I live you also will live.  On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you….All this I have spoken while still with you.  But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.  Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you.”  John 14.15-20,25-27           

What am I to think if God does not know me or see me?  Am I not alone in the world?  Is there not an impenetrable divide between us all?  The bond of unity lies in the definition, but without the intent of God we have no definition.  We are randomness classified into arbitrary categories, our DNA something we can edit without a thought for the meaning of “human excellence.”

Do we know each other?  Is not the only hope of being known and understood that we by birth be patterned after the plan of the One who made us and that he be even now a living God and that he exist beyond the patterns of necessity and that he be of that very character that is beyond the rational, that is irrational, that is love.  That is our only hope of being known, if the one who made us also loves us and seeks us for himself.

This is uniquely the character of YHVH the God of Israel, whom we know in this time through the person of Yeshua our Messiah.  The very few will answer the call of Yeshua:

“Behold I stand at the door and knock.  If anyone hears my voice and opens the door I will come in and sup with him and he with me.”  Revelation 3.20

It is a call to transformation.  It is a promise that God through his Spirit will maintain a presence in the heart’s house and heal us and instruct us and bring to us the life and the will and the understanding which he has meant to be our possession since the rebellion of the first generation left a huge tear in the fabric of the world.   Those who open the heart to his life are opening their lives to his sovereignty and his loving claim upon their lives.  We would never accept that claim and would prefer our own alienated autonomy if we did not see that in a state of autonomy we are part of the damage in the world.  We accept his love and his sovereignty knowing that in the deepest interior of the heart’s house we seek to be known and loved by our God.



Lawrence S. Jones

Chicago  2016




[1] Genesis 16.7-15

[2] Colossians 1. 15-20

[3] Proclamation of faith in the Oneness of God and the finality of the prophethood of Muhammad; establishment of  the five daily prayers [ritual and canonical]; paying tithe to the Islamic state or to a representative of a local mosque; fasting the month of  Ramadan; the pilgrimage to Mecca if able.

[4] Baptism, confirmation, communion, confession, marriage, “holy orders,” and the anointing of the sick

[5][5] I. al-Faruqi, Christian Mission and Islamic Dawah: Proceedings of the Chambesy Dialogue Consultation, pp. 47-48

The Fundamentalist abandonment of the kingship of Yeshua, the Messiah of Israel


, , , ,



The renunciation

In a recent post I noted the obscenity of the Papal dismissal of the crucifixion.  But it would be unfair of me to criticize the Pope and ignore the excesses at the heart of modern Protestantism.  The Pope is not alone in redacting whole chapters of the life of our Messiah.  Conservative Protestant theology has taken possession of an equally distasteful renunciation of the Messiah, a renunciation which goes unnoticed because it has been so thoroughly established in the culture of the last century, so well prepared in the preceding centuries of Catholicism.

The conservative Protestants do not wait for the crucifixion to demean their Lord.  They start a week early, on what is called Palm Sunday, the day of the ritual entry of Yeshua into Jerusalem riding on a donkey, in fulfillment of the prophecy of Zechariah.

His entry on a donkey was a culturally explicit declaration that he entered the city as king.  Accordingly he received the honor and adoration of the people as their king:

“Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord!  Peace in heaven and glory in the highest.”[1]

And, more specifically,

            “Blessed is the king of Israel.”[2]

And, indicating that he was seen as the rightful heir to the throne of David:

“Hosanna to the Son of David.”[3]

Were the people of Jerusalem guilty of hyperbole when they hailed Yeshua as their king?  The priests thought so, therefore they asked him to rebuke and silence his followers.  Yeshua responded with the suggestion that this was a moment which no force of history could impede:

“If they keep quiet, the stones will cry out.”[4]

Yes. The arrival of Yeshua as king over Israel was so certain and so fundamental to the history of all the world, that, should we fail in recognition, then nature itself feels the wound and must give witness.  It is inconceivable that Yeshua would have accorded himself the form of entry into Jerusalem as king, coupled with the receipt of praise as king, were it not already certain that he, on his way to the cross, was in fact in full possession of his royal role and character.

Then what is the affront of the great majority of conservative Protestants and fundamentalists?   It is that they deny that Yeshua is king upon the eternal throne over Israel, transcendent Israel, the Israel of God.  Nor do they recognize the existence of this Israel.  They see only genetic Israel and the geopolitical construct of recent decades.  They seem to imagine that a seat of royal authority must be a gilded throne within view of the masses.  They fault the Creator of the universe for not having an office in downtown Jerusalem.  They confuse transcendent Israel with an earthly fabrication along lines of Zionist politics and genetic descent.

It has not always been so.  Prior to this century it was common to find members of the church who, given in their hearts to the Messiah of Israel, and not genetically Jewish, still saw themselves as citizens of the transcendent Israel of God.  Witness this hymn of John Newton[1725-1807]:

Glorious things of thee are spoken,
Zion, city of our God!
He, whose word cannot be broken,
Form’d thee for His own abode:
On the Rock of ages founded,
What can shake thy sure repose?
With salvation’s walls surrounded,
Thou may’st smile at all thy foes.

Bless’d inhabitants of Zion,
Wash’d in the Redeemer’s blood!
Jesus, whom their souls rely on,
Makes them kings and priests to God.
‘Tis His love His people raises
Over self to reign as kings,
And as priests, His solemn praises
Each for a thank-off’ring brings.

Saviour, if of Zion’s city
I through grace a member am,

Let the world deride or pity,
I will glory in Thy name:
Fading is the worldling’s pleasure,
All his boasted pomp and show:
Solid joys and lasting treasure,
None but Zion’s children know.

For John Newton, Zion is the home of all children of God, and we, the children of Yeshua, are to the manor born.  Like Abraham, Zion is our home, whether or not it is occupied by others, for we who have eternal life occupy the eternal promise which, in His own time, God will fulfill.

Corruption crept into Protestant thinking.  Belief in the kingship of Yeshua was thrown aside.  Toward the middle of the nineteenth century John Nelson Darby, [1800-1882], an Irish Anglican priest, began to formalize a theology which rested on 1.] the complete separation of the church and Israel, 2.] the belief that Yeshua came as “candidate” for kingship but was rejected by the Jewish people and so returned to heaven in failure, [his hopes dashed?], and 3.] a belief in two completely different destinies for genetic Israel and the church, the church to be raptured up into heaven at the beginning of the final seven years of tribulation, the Jews to remain on earth and tough it out, battling the Beast Kingdom, compensated only by the fact that they are finally rid of those annoying gentiles.  Such a theology has great utility to the Zionists, and brings great pleasure to the architects of Catholicism.

It is useful to the Zionists because it gets Protestants to back off from Israel and abandon their claims upon its destiny.  This allows the secular Zionist to claim for himself, on genetic grounds, all the ancient promises, in particular the promise to Abraham of a land “from the River of Egypt to the Euphrates.”

It is pleasurable to Catholic ambition because it causes Protestants to abandon every earthly claim to the kingdom of God and the promises to Abraham.  As consequence, the Messianic hopes of the church can remain in heaven, up in the sky: this sky within which the Catholic church has sequestered Christ since its inception.  Like the Zionists, therefore, the Vatican also is free to pursue its earthy objectives.  [It has always been the program of the Catholic institution to offer mankind the semblance of the knowledge of God while inserting itself between man and God and usurping to itself the power and authority which rightly belong to God alone, even making the Pope the Vicarius Filii Dei, the” Representative of the Son of God,”  the vicarious substitute for the presence and rule of Christ in the world.  They even ordain each priest with the blasphemous phrase, Tu es alter Christus, “you are another Christ,” further displacing Christ in their cosmology.]

As for the Protestants, this recent deformation of their theology, known academically as “premillennial dispensationalism,” renounces the kingship of Yeshua and hardly deserves a rebuttal, any more than we would wish to debate Scripture with that false prophet, Pope Francis.  Only let it be known that their impoverished line of thought has nothing to do with what is actually written in Scripture.

Nevertheless, Darby’s anemic philosophy broadly prevails within the halls of conservative Protestantism.  On the heels of Darby, who was not widely known, came C.I. Scofield and his vastly popular Scofield Reference Bible in which, through copious footnotes, he and his accomplices interpreted all of Scripture in the light of their redefinition of Israel and the church, in light of their gross mishandling of the triumph of Yeshua at the cross.  So who were his readers to believe? the Expert? or their own eyes?  In laziness they chose “the Expert,” by the thousands.  And with them went the leaders of the Evangelical church and the seminaries.



Peter affirms the kingship of Yeshua

Anyone with a basic command of the English language and the ability to think for himself can figure out the falsehood of their pre-tribulation rapture by reading I Thessalonians 4.13-17 and II Thessalonians 2.1-10.  [They can also read the article, Boiling Frogs and the Return of the King, on this blogsite.]

Anyone who thinks Yeshua came as “candidate” for kingship has never read the Bible.

Anyone who thinks that the church of Yahveh and the Israel of Yahveh are mutually exclusive has done nothing but listen to sermons rather than read the Bible.

Anyone who wants to know if Yeshua is on the eternal throne at this moment should read carefully the following Scriptures – and should make personal discovery of the politics of Yeshua through swearing fealty to his person, through kneeling before him who is seated on the heavenly throne, and through opening the heart to the commanding presence of his Spirit.

On the Day of Pentecost when the Spirit of God first descended in power upon the people of God in Jerusalem, Peter addressed the onlookers, explaining that this was the fulfillment of the prophecies of Joel that the Spirit would be poured out.  Then he told them that even though they, the people of Israel, had crucified Christ, yet God had not abandoned Yeshua to the grave and he had risen from the dead.  Peter then reminded them that David also had prophesied about the coming Messiah, the coming anointed king, and had said,

“that God had promised him on oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne.”[5]

Peter then continued to explain how recent events were the very groundwork of the fulfillment of the Messianic prophecy:

“Seeing what was ahead, he [David] spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that he was not abandoned to the grave, nor did his body see decay.  God has raised this Jesus to life, and we are all witnesses of the fact.  Exalted to the right hand of God, he has received from the Father the promised Holy Spirit and has poured out what you now see and hear….Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Yeshua, whom you crucified, both Lord and Anointed King [Christ].”[6]

Yes, Pentecost and the pouring out of the Holy Spirit is the evidence that Yeshua is on the throne of heaven reaching out into all the world to all his subjects in power and healing and instruction.  The Holy Spirit is the matrix and the cement of the kingdom through which Yeshua is able to rule in our hearts as no other king can rule.

Catholics are willing to call Yeshua king as long as he stays at a distance, the tragically abused child of their “Queen of Heaven.”  Their churches often have Latin slogans naming Yeshua as Rex, though not king of the Jews but king of “the kingdom.”  [Rex Regnum Sum.]  This causes them no pain because Yeshua has been shelved in the heavens, co-opted by his mother Mary, and now the Pope wears the actual crown of authority.  In fact his blasphemous crown has three rings or tiers, signifying that he has taken upon himself ultimate ecclesiastical authority, ultimate temporal authority, and ultimate cosmic authority!

Protestants are willing to see Yeshua as their coming king, while in present time he is merely their personal savior.  They expect him to have royal authority in the future, although for all their skill in interpreting the Bible, no one identifies the scenario of the future coronation.



Daniel identifies the kingship of the Messiah in the course of history

Daniel, however, received from God quite a different timeline.  For Daniel the royalty of the Messiah and his kingship over his people does not come at the end of history.  It all comes about within the course of the political doings of the kings of the earth.

In the second chapter of the book of Daniel, we find him interpreting a dream of Nebuchadnezzar.  The king has envisioned a statue with a head of gold, chest and arms of silver, belly and thighs of bronze, legs of iron, feet partly iron and partly baked clay.  Prophetically, Daniel shares the divine interpretation that the elements of the statue represent the great kingdoms of history, beginning with Nebuchadnezzar as the head of gold.  The subsequent kingdoms are now recognized as the Medo-Persian Empire [silver], the Greek Empire [bronze], the Roman Empire [iron]… and a later confederation of Rome with other powers, in a ten part division…sounding something like the coming partnership and dominion of the Vatican [Rome], the UN, and Islam [OIC].  And where does the kingdom of Yeshua fit in?  Daniel describes its entry and the outcome.

Daniel says to Nebuchadnezzar  that

“while you were watching [the statue], a rock was cut out, but not by human hands.”[7]

In the interpretation Daniel explains,

In the time of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people.”[8]

As for the outcome, in the dream it was noticed,

“It [the rock] struck the statue on its feet of iron and clay and smashed them.  Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver and the gold were broken to pieces at the same time and became like chaff on a threshing floor in the summer.  The wind swept them away without leaving a trace.  But the rock that struck the statue became a huge mountain and filled the whole earth.”[9]

As interpretation, Daniel says,

“It [the kingdom created in the time of those kings] will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever.”[10]

In other words it is in the course of history, not at the end of history, that we are to find Yeshua as king over his people.  Yeshua first appeared as king within the dominion of Rome.  Now, in a world where every national leader kisses the ring of the Pope, we are in the amalgam of Rome with “baked clay.”  And throughout all this we see the remnants of Babylon and Greece and Persia.  But, in transcendence, the kingdom of Yeshua is more real than every kingdom.

Gideon had thirty- two thousand nominal soldiers, but God told him to take only three hundred tested soldiers.  Three hundred were given victory over the entire army of Midian.  So for us today.  The handful of faithful on earth will march with the armies of heaven and in the coming years will see the victory of Yeshua over the nations who cynically join themselves together, thinking that they will take ownership of the earth.



Prophetically, David sees God’s chosen king besieged by the nations

The second Psalm similarly creates a picture of the Messianic king who has not yet assumed power over brick and dust, who, as Lord over a transcendent Zion, is also “in the time of those kings,” beleaguered by national powers in opposition to his sovereign power.  It is especially now, in the approach of the new global society, that we see revealed the depth and ancient roots of the conspiracy of rebellion to establish a world without the laws of the covenant and without the people of the covenant:

“Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain?  The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the Lord and against his Anointed One.  “Let us break their chains,” they say, “and throw off their fetters.”  The One enthroned in heaven laughs; the Lord scoffs at them.  Then he rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying, “I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill.”[11]

Be he in the dust of Zion or on the heavenly throne, the living Messiah, Yeshua, rules substantially in the hearts of his subjects through the power and presence of his Spirit reaching into us and binding us to himself with cords of steel.  We are the ones who have the responsibility to stand in our faith, to own the covenant and to live as the people of the covenant.  Only ignorance and cowardice can cause people to abandon a covenant sealed by the blood of Yeshua.




The anointing of Yeshua

The great truths of Scripture, the ponderous informing moments in the life of our Lord, are not intelligible to the masses.  No matter what we have been taught, the great truths of faith are esoteric, not exoteric.  Yeshua delighted in making himself obscure to those who claimed they knew it all.  And when Peter saw what others could not see, Yeshua remarked that it was only through the voice of the Father that he could know such things.

To anyone who does not know Yeshua intimately, the cross is a mystery.  Similarly the anointing of Yeshua is not apparent to the eye of the world, as it expects to witness the affirmation of a Westminster Abbey, of pomp and ceremony.  The anointing of Yeshua is esoterically and spiritually perceived.

To anoint is to ordain or to consecrate.   To ordain is to select and, by virtue of authority, to appoint.  To consecrate is to set apart, to devote.  Mere application of substance, even special oil, by a person without specific authority, could not make anyone the Messiah.   And what oil would the Father use to add gravity to his appointment and consecration of his Son as ruler over his holy people and ruler over all Creation?  Surely nothing could be more grave than his own hand and his own word.

David could not have been anointed by Samuel as king on the throne of Israel, were it not that Samuel acted under the direction and command of God.  Through Samuel, Yahveh himself chose David.  The oil of anointing was merely a witness to the presence of the voice of Yahveh in the selection.

In the appointment of Yeshua, the voice of Yahveh alone, emanating from the heavens, is sufficient.  That moment in which Mary of Bethany broke open the costly container of nard and anointed Yeshua was a moment of powerful significance in the heart of Yeshua.  But it was not within her sphere of power to anoint Yeshua as Messiah. She was a simple woman enacting a very special custom of appreciation.  Yeshua said that her act had special meaning as it looked forward to his burial.  But she did not anoint him as Messiah.

Only the Father can own the authority to choose and appoint and devote his Son to the role of eternal king over his holy people.  Whether or not there has been or is yet to be a day of visible anointing with oil is not a determinant factor.  What is determinant is the explicit act of the Father to designate Yeshua as king over his holy people.

King David had three anointings.  David’s first anointing occurred on the day that Yahveh revealed his choice of David to Samuel.  He was definitively chosen to replace Saul as king over Israel, though the assumption of power was yet to come.

“Then the Lord said, ‘Rise and anoint him, he is the one.’  So Samuel took the horn of oil and anointed him in the presence of his brothers, and from that day on the Spirit of the Lord came upon David in power.”[12]

It was not just a tentative or nominal anointing as evidenced by the fact that “the Spirit of the Lord came upon David in power.”  Prior to the anointing David was a shepherd.  Subsequent to the anointing he was a prince of Israel surrounded by a hedge of God’s presence and power.

Soon after the death of Saul, God told David to move to Hebron.  There he received a second anointing.

“Then the men of Judah came to Hebron and there they anointed David king over the house of Judah.[13]

Now he was made ruling king over the tribe into which he was born, the tribe which has always owned the great Messianic promise.  These were his people.  And it was God’s will to establish him as king over them.

Soon Abner, the commander of Saul’s army, led the way in preparing all Israel to recognize David as their king, even conferring with the elders of Israel and telling them,

“The Lord promised David, ‘By my servant David I will rescue my people Israel from the hand of the Philistines and from the hand of all their enemies.’”[14]

David had been chosen by God to be king over Israel, and he was now ruling as king over the people of Judah.  With the third anointing he would assume sovereign power over all Israel:

“When all the elders of Israel had come to King David at Hebron, the king made a compact with them at Hebron before the Lord, and they anointed David king over Israel.”[15]

If David were not already in possession of royal authority he could not have made a compact [covenant] with the people.  A covenant is an oath defining allegiance between a king and his people.

The life of David and the series of anointings sealing his kingship are given to us as a type and as a key to understanding the anointings of Yeshua.

Up to this time we see Yeshua anointed twice in the course of his life on earth, in circumstances analogous to those of David.  It seems that there may come yet a third anointing when at last the rift is healed between Judah and Israel, so enabling the day when Yeshua will freely exercise his sovereignty over all of Israel.

Yeshua’s first anointing came at the time of his baptism in the Jordan.  In that moment Yahveh clearly marked him as the Messiah of Israel’s expectation, and the power of the Spirit of God was brought upon him.  Yeshua’s second anointing came on the Mount of Transfiguration.  In this moment he was again marked as Yahveh’s chosen king, and his children were called to fealty.   In each of these events Yahveh ordained Yeshua as Messiah by speaking highly significant phrases from the heavens in the hearing of those on the ground.  In each anointing he said the words,

“This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.”[16]

We see that these are the words of divine anointing once we see that they, by God’s own word, announce the fulfillment in Yeshua of the Messianic prophecy, and this we will demonstrate.  First, however, to look at the record of the anointing at the Jordan.

Matthew’s account is as follows:

“As soon as Jesus was baptized, he went up out of the water.  At that moment heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting on him.  And a voice from heaven said, ‘This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.’”[17]

Mark’s account is similar:

“At that time Jesus came from Nazareth in Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan.  As Jesus was coming up out of the water, he saw heaven being torn open and the Spirit descending on him like a dove.  And a voice came from heaven: ‘You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.’”[18]

What must be shown from Scripture is the significance of these words in the speech of the Father.  But we must also consider the account of what Yahveh spoke on the Mount of Transfiguration.

As the time approached for Yeshua to enter Jerusalem and go to the cross, and being near Mount Hermon, he stopped with his disciples in Caesarea Phillippi, a place devoted to the worship of Roman gods.  Surrounded by the artifacts of false gods, Yeshua asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”  and he asked Peter, “Who do you say I am?”

Peter answered, “You are the Christ [ha Mashiach, the anointed king], the Son of the living God.”[19] Peter had come to know this, and, since the anointing at the Jordan, this was explicitly true.  Yeshua assured Peter that this was esoteric knowledge, that “this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven.[20]  And then Yeshua “warned his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Christ.”  Yes, at this moment he was the anointed king.  But he was not yet in a position to assume power over all the people of the nation.  He was on course toward the assumption of power over the few, over his very own, over those who hold to him and recognize his sovereignty.  Therefore it was important that he not be hailed as mundane Messiah over the mundane nation.  Furthermore he was directed moment by moment toward the cross, which would become his first great royal achievement for his people.  He wanted no pointless adulation to come in the way of his mission.  For this purpose he insisted that his disciples tell no one that he was the Christ.

A week later Yeshua took Peter, John and James and “went up onto a mountain to pray,”[21] probably onto nearby Mount Hermon.

“As he was praying, the appearance of his face changed, and his clothes became as bright as a flash of lightning.”[22]

[Now he had the appearance which John attributes to him[23] in his vision of Yeshua in heaven after the resurrection and ascension into the heavens.]  And now, on the mountain,

“Two men, Moses and Elijah, appeared in glorious splendor, talking with Jesus.  They spoke about his departure, which he was about to bring to fulfillment at Jerusalem.”[24]

But the Greek for “departure” is exodus, and in this context they are referring to much more than his change of address from earth to heaven, but rather the Exodus which would soon be made possible at the cross as he “would deliver his people from the bondage of sin and bring to fulfillment the work of both Moses and Elijah.”[25]

“Peter and his companions were very sleepy, but when they became fully awake, they saw his glory and the two men standing with him.  As the men were leaving Jesus, Peter said to him, ‘Master, it is good for us to be here.  Let us put up three shelters – one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah.’ [He did not know what he was saying.]”[26]

Even though Peter had been given the insight that Yeshua is the Christ, there still seemed to be limits to his understanding of Yeshua’s divinity, and he imagined Yeshua sharing some sort of architectural honor equally with Elijah and Moses.  Then the voice of Yahveh entered the scene in the hearing of Peter, James and John, and in the hearing of Moses and Elijah:

“While he was still speaking, a bright cloud enveloped them, and a voice from the cloud said, ‘This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.   Listen to him!’”

This time there is an additional appointment: Listen to him!  According to the construction in the Greek, “Listen to him” [Akouete autou] is acceptable but not strong enough.  Because autou is in the genitive case, a preferred translation would be “hearken to him and obey him.”  Yahveh is formally affirming that full authority now belongs to Yeshua.

With this anointing Yeshua is not only marked and set aside for kingship, he is now free to establish a covenant between himself and his people, free to act on their behalf, to undertake the Exodus which will lead them out of bondage to the enemy.  In the final weeks of Yeshua’s life he will act to affirm the actuality of his sovereign power.



The prophetic content of the words of anointing

So now at last we look at the origin of the unusually simple words with which Yahveh appointed Yeshua as our great and eternal king.

We look first at one of the earliest Messianic prophecies which refer specifically to the Messianic occupation of royal power.  Here, uniquely, we find Yahveh characterizing the tenure of the role of Messiah in terms of a unique relationship which shall hold between himself and the anointed king over the holy people.  The prophet Nathan relayed to David the words of Yahveh promising David that from his offspring would come the eternal king, and here, as never previously, Yahveh identified the Messiah as his Son:

“’I will raise up your offspring to succeed you, …and I will establish his kingdom.  He is the one who will build a house for my Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever.  I will be his father and he will be my son….My love will never be taken away from him.  Your house and your kingdom will endure forever before me; your throne will be established forever.’”[27]

Later, David, prophetically, recalls the words of this foundational prophecy in the words of the second Psalm:

“I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill.”  I will proclaim the decree of Yahveh: He said to me, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father.  Ask of me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession.”[28]

So with the prophecies of Nathan and of David, this unique event in which Yahveh calls someone his Son, this becomes an identifier of the coming eternal king over Israel.  Now then we look at the second phrase spoken each time from the heavens: “With you I am well pleased.” This also has its roots in Messianic prophecy, in Isaiah 42, where Yahveh promises the coming of the one who rules in union with his own will, who is given all the power of the Spirit, and who rules and brings justice to all the earth:

Here is my servant, whom I uphold, my chosen one in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit on him and he will bring justice to the nations… In faithfulness he will bring forth justice; he will not falter or be discouraged till he establishes justice on the earth.  In his law the islands will put their hope… This is what God Yahveh says – he who created the heavens and stretched them out, who spread out the earth and all that comes out of it, who gives breath to its people, and life to those who walk on it:   ‘I, Yahveh, have called you in righteousness; I will take hold of your hand.  I will keep you and will make you to be a covenant for the people and a light for the Gentiles, to open eyes that are blind, to free captives from prison and to release from the dungeon those who sit in darkness.’”[29]

Yahveh, in each event, spoke from the heavens, combining these two key phrases known to be prophetic references to the coming Messiah, and in speaking those phrases in each event, as his Son stood before John and the people gathered in search of righteousness at the river Jordan, and later as his Son stood glorified before the earthly witness of James and Peter and John and the heavenly witness of Moses and Elijah, so Yahveh poured out on Yeshua his absolute appointment of Yeshua as king over his holy people.



Yeshua has assumed power over his people, transcendent Israel.  In the coming time he will assume power over all the earth.

Out of the anointing of Yeshua came the affirmation of his royal power.  Yeshua, knowing that the established powers of the Temple were seeking his death, entered Jerusalem as king and received the honor of his people as their true king.  Then, as king, Yeshua went to the cross, so standing in for his people, taking upon himself the penalty of their every shame, setting them free from the curse of death which clings to our sin, bringing to us the freedom to come into the presence of God.   Resurrected from the grave, Yeshua gave us a call to obedient fealty to him, and a mission to carry the gospel of the kingdom into all the world, empowered by the life of his Spirit within our bodies, assuring us at his ascension that,

All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.  And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”[30]

Yes, it is the gospel of an actual kingdom that must be held up for men to see, especially at this time as the kingdoms of the world descend into what appears to be a conspiracy of global war. Our hope lies only with our king in his transcendent kingdom.  The renewal of all things awaits the completion of our mission.

“And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.”[31]

Why does the church not see Yeshua ruling as king over them?  For the simple reason that they are happy to have his salvation, his counsel, and his blessings, but they reject his sovereign authority over them.


L.S. Jones

[1] Luke 19.38

[2] John 12.13

[3] Matthew 21.9

[4] Luke 19.40

[5] Acts 2.30

[6] Acts 2.31-36 excerpts

[7] Daniel 2.34

[8] Daniel 2.44

[9] Daniel 2.34,35

[10] Daniel 2.44

[11] Psalm 2.1-6

[12] I Samuel 16.12,13

[13] II Samuel 2.4

[14] II Samuel 3.18

[15] II Samuel 5.3

[16] Matthew 3.17

[17] Matthew 3.16,17

[18] Mark 1.9-11

[19] Matthew 16.16

[20] Matthew 16.17

[21] Luke 9.28

[22] Luke 9.29

[23] Revelation  1.13-18

[24] Luke 9.31

[25] NIV footnote on Luke 9.30, NIV Self-Study Bible, Concordia 1986

[26] Luke 9.32-34

[27] II Samuel 7.12-17 excerpts

[28] Psalm 2.6-8

[29] Isaiah 42.1-7 excerpts

[30] Matthew 28.18-20

[31] Matthew 24.14

Francis, the Roman Pontifex Maximus, assesses, in human terms, the crucifixion of Yeshua, the Messiah of Israel


, ,



“Here at the cross is the man who loves his enemies, the man whose righteousness is greater than that of the Pharisees, who being rich became poor, who gives his robe to those who took his cloak, who prays for those who despitefully use him.  The cross is not a detour or a hurdle on the way to the kingdom, nor is it even the way to the kingdom; it is the kingdom come.”[1]                                               John Howard Yoder


Today the Roman Pontifex Maximus has publicly made the claim that Yeshua ended his life in failure at the cross.  Given the faith which he pretends to represent, nothing could be a more brazen denunciation and attempted mockery of that faith than his own words:

“If at times our efforts and works seem to fail and not produce fruit, we need to remember that we are followers of Jesus Christ, and his life, humanly speaking, ended in failure, the failure of the cross.”  September 25, 2015, at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City.

Dear Francis, methinks thou dost hasten too much.  You are clearly in a race to abandon every tenet of faith that ever stood under the people of your institution.  You are in a race to reach that lowest common denominator of faith before the world unites in its orgy of globalism without you.  Yes, you are so anxious to be the matchmaker uniting all the ecclesiastical sluts into one seraglio with yourself as trusted eunuch over them so that you can reap the reward of delivering them to the global tyrant.

It is broadly recognized that the Pontifex assigns no value to the sacrifice of Yeshua upon the cross, as he credits those who discount the cross – Muslims, Jews, sodomites, and atheists – as having the same access to divine mercy as those who hold the life and sacrifice of Yeshua to be the doorway to life itself.  For the Pontifex, what matters is simply a certain sentiment of the heart, implying that Yeshua, in going to the cross, was but a master of melodrama.  If only Yeshua had recognized that human rebellion against God is but a little thing, then he might have lived a longer life…wearing purple and scarlet and gold…perhaps even with a little villa on one of the hills of Rome.

This leads us to consider a vision of what Francis sees as the inconsequential gravity of belief of every kind.  Yes, Francis is an advocate of belief, but belief of a special and well- tempered quality.  We are all to have our beliefs, but, according to the Roman Pontifex, we are to hold them so lightly that they never occupy a stance counter to the varied beliefs of others.

In other words, we are expected to maintain private beliefs, never presuming to set a hand to the awkward rigidity of  “universal” or “ incontrovertible” truth.

There is a church in Hyde Park called University Church, in front of which a sign is posted.  Upon this sign they boast that they “Have No Creed.”  I am sure that, if questioned, everyone who frequents the church would admit to believing certain things, but when they say, “We have no creed,” they are saying, “We do not publicly own any creed.”  Their beliefs are discreet and personal. This is what the Pontifex wants, for without this discretion the diverse people of earth cannot be brought into alignment in a One World Religion, that over which he or his successor may soon attempt to place himself.

We may believe whatever we want in the privacy of our own thoughts, but we are not to take ownership and stand publicly for the universal and incontrovertible truth of anything, even if we see our brothers and sisters drowning in half- truths, in misconceptions, in outright lies, grieving to know one day of honesty before they perish in a sea of mediocrity adrift with platitudes.

Yeshua, the Messiah, the Anointed King of Israel, went by his own choice, by his own carefully crafted purpose, to stand in the breach, to go to the cross in the greatest act of love in all the history of God and man.  He took upon himself the cost of human rebellion against our God: Yeshua, the king, standing in for his people.

In the talks which ended World War II, the Allies questioned the share that France should receive, claiming that, while England struggled, France was compromised under the Vichy government.  De Gaulle stood up to the table and declared, “I fought the Resistance.  France fought the Resistance.”  He commanded that the valour of his people be reckoned the same as the proven valour of their leader.  So stands Yeshua before the throne of God.  Having paid the price of sin, being king over his people, and being the true and only Son of God, none can protest his achievement of the mercy of the Father.

Yes, traditionally, even Catholics have shared this belief.  But the Pontifex of Rome judges the ponderous groan of love at the cross to be nothing but the complaint of human failure.

A child runs into the street, is about to be stuck by a car.  A bystander, placing absolute value on the life of the child, runs into the street, sets out his own life in danger of loss, pushes the child out of the way, but himself is struck and killed.  For Francis is this life, in human terms, a failure?

Actually I suspect that even the heart of blackest stone would not call such a life a failure.  My belief is that the Pontifex actually has no idea what happened at the cross, or, worse yet, that he is wedded to the enemies of God, the sleepers at the heart of the New Roman Babylon, who will in the coming years be cast down, due to that very victory of our king at the cross.

In fact, it is only the cross which offends the world.  The primas and primos of popular culture never reach to insult Hinduism or Buddhism or Shintoism or Humanism or Theosophy or Islam or even Judaism.  They mock the cross.  They mock Yeshua the true Messiah of transcendent Israel.  Because the cross alone demands that mankind recognize its rebellion and self absorption.  At the cross God incontrovertibly enters history and declares that we are not our own, that he has a claim on the purpose of time and on the purposes of each man’s soul.  The cross is the looming fact of history upon which the world stumbles, and Francis the Pontifex Maximus of the Roman power has placed himself foremost among the fallen.

“And war broke out in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting with the dragon; the dragon and his angels also fought, but they failed, and there was no place for them in heaven any longer.  So the huge dragon was thrown down – that old serpent called the Devil and Satan, the seducer of the whole world – thrown down to earth, and his angels thrown down along with him.  Then I heard a loud voice in heaven saying, ‘Now has it come, the salvation and power, the reign of our God and the authority of his Christ! – for the Accuser of our brothers is thrown down, who accused them day and night before our God.  But they have conquered him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony; they had to die for it, but they did not cling to life.  Rejoice for this, O heavens and ye that dwell in them!  But woe to earth and sea!  The devil has descended to you in fierce anger, knowing that his time is short.’[2]

“So he bore me away rapt in the Spirit to the desert, and there I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet Beast covered with blasphemous titles… In her hand was a golden cup full of all earth’s abominations and impurities of vice, and on her forehead a name was written by way of symbol, ‘Babylon the great, the mother of harlots and of all abominations on earth.’  I saw that the woman was drunk with the blood of the saints and the blood of the witnesses of Jesus… As for the Beast…to perdition he shall go.  As for the ten horns you have seen, they are ten kings who…receive royal authority…along with the Beast;…They shall wage war on the Lamb, but the Lamb will conquer them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings – the Lamb and the elect, the chosen, the faithful who are with him….As for the woman you have seen, she is the great City which reigns over the kings of the earth.’[3]


Lawrence S. Jones

email: lawrencestewartjones@gmail,com


[1] The Politics of Jesus, p. 51, by John Howard Yoder

[2] Revelation 12.7-12

[3] Revelation 17.3-18 excerpts

On the Other Side of the Mass for Christ


, , ,

Part I.  The Call of God and the Weight of Tradition

Part II.  Time, the Calendar, and the Seven Feasts of Israel

Part III.  The Feasts of Israel and the Messiah of Israel

Lawrence S. Jones


I. The Call of God and the Weight of Tradition



The roots of celebration                 

I want to take this time following the season of Christmas to reflect upon this holiday which receives such esteem in our culture, though its roots feed more on tradition than on any imperative of Scripture or faith.  As the person of Yeshua so the birth and earthly life of Yeshua are for me of significance beyond question.  I question only my relationship to the “Christmas”  nativity celebration as it has come down to us through centuries of nominally Christian culture.

Most of us have grown up with Christmas.   I have no desire to challenge memorable moments in my past, nor to doubt the complex history through which we individually come to know and worship God.  Few of us have come to knowledge of the Messiah of Israel outside of the culture of the Christian church, a body whose form is, tragically, founded in a millennium of Catholicism, centuries of spurious sacraments, marriage between church and state, and the common man groping for God without benefit of Scripture.  For one thousand years, from the days of Constantine until the days of Tyndale, the Catholic institution pretended that the word of God should be kept from the common man.  To this end, in plain sight, the Catholic church murdered thousands upon thousands who held the truth of Scripture more precious than the traditions of the church.  With such a foundation, we are more than justified in questioning the rites and celebrations inherited from the “church fathers.”

Whatever our prejudice for feasts and holy days, we also remember the words of Paul:

One man considers one day more sacred than another; another man considers every day alike.  Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind.  He who regards one day as special, does so to the Lord.  He who eats meat, eats to the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he who abstains, does so to the Lord and gives thanks to God.  For none of us lives to himself alone and none of us dies to himself alone.   If we live, we live to the Lord; and if we die, we die to the Lord.  So whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord.”  Romans 14.5-8

These words in no way suggest that all days are the same.  Paul is saying that our attitude of worship has more significance than any formal or uninspired adherence to tradition: “We live to the Lord.”  Paul would be the last person to say that the Sabbath is only a state of mind.  Throughout the book of Acts Paul and the disciples celebrate the traditional Sabbath, by one count 85 times, along with celebrations of Passover, Unleavened Bread, and, of course, Pentecost.  Paul says clearly, “Each one should be convinced in his own mind,” and, “If we live, we live to the Lord.”  In other words, conviction of and sincere devotion to the highest expectations of our king are the proper measure of our actions.

In the same vein, Yahveh expressed through Isaiah his abhorrence of feasts and Sabbaths celebrated mechanically and not from the heart.  At a time when God believed that Israel worshipped him only through appearances, he told them through Isaiah,

The multitude of your sacrifices – what are they to me?…Stop bringing meaningless  offerings! Your incense is detestable to me.  New Moons, Sabbaths and convocations – I cannot bear your evil assemblies.  Your New Moon festivals and your appointed feasts y soul hates….When you spread out your hands in prayer, I will hide my eyes from you; even if you offer many prayers, I will not listen.”[1]

Nevertheless, there are, even in this time, still hearts which seek the face of God.  We know that there are “appointed feasts” in Scripture.  We seek to know the heart of God in this matter.  We live in a culture which rarely questions the religious traditions of the churches.  But the traditions of the apostate church deserve to be questioned, and our hearts should be open to whatever brings most honor to our king and our kingdom.  We may find that in the ancient feasts of Israel, which are mostly ignored by the church, there are important prophetic indicators, and that our consideration of these feasts is intended to help us root ourselves in our history as well as see into future time.  The celebration of feasts manufactured by church hierarchies without concern for the will of God may cloud our understanding and render us less able to be alert and act courageously in the challenges ahead of us.

I want to determine whether Christmas deserves to be the true celebration of the birth of our Messiah, and if not, what is that celebration which truly honors him.




God of history, Sabbath of history

In rehearsal for assessing the merits of Christmas it might be worthwhile to take a short detour and look at the church’s tradition of Sunday worship.  The conflict between Scripture and Tradition becomes clear when one seeks to weigh the church’s Sunday celebration against the ancient Sabbath of Israel.[2]

It is impossible to brush aside this conflict if one should find oneself bound to Yeshua and perceive that he is bound not simply to his Redeemer [a personal event], but even to the Messiah, the king of Israel [a political event].  In such a circumstance we feel compelled to explore the extent to which our bond to Yeshua goes beyond the simple intimacy of standing in the presence of God.  It becomes necessary to ask what it means to be bound to the king of the ancient nation.  In this context one feels the call of the ancient Sabbath, and the need arises to know how it has come to be replaced by a tradition without roots in Scripture.

One thing I hold to be unshakable: that no modern voice and no text of Scripture can deny that Yeshua is today on the historic and heavenly throne of David, seated as lord and king over the Israel of God, as should be the clear meaning of Peter’s announcement on the day of Pentecost:[3]

“Let all the house of Israel therefore know assuredly that God has made him both Lord and Messiah, this Yeshua whom you crucified.”[4]  

The task, then, is to know the meaning and the reach of this Israel of GodInquiry into the Israel of God reveals the extent to which the many shades of modern Christianity originated on the pallet of Roman Catholicism in its ploy to substitute itself for the authority of God Himself, even to install its gentile rituals in the hearts of believers, while silently discarding the culture of the patriarchs and of our Messiah.

In the present age we are aggravated in the need to seriously reckon the meaning of the Israel of God as day after day we see the tragic insensitivity and criminal aggression of the Zionist “state” of Israel against its Palestinian and Bedouin citizens, as also we watch our own country, the United States of America, act always in unquestioning, obedient support of the agenda of the Zionist entity.  It is painful for faith in the Messiah of Israel to watch a most criminal political agenda transpire in the name of “Israel.”  This is not to ignore the degree to which Islam is also a renunciation of the God of Israel and of the Messiah of Israel.  It is rather to recognize that the Messiah of Israel will take possession of the dust and bricks of Jerusalem, not through the injustice of the bulldozer, not through the construction of containment camps and checkpoints, but through the power of his word of truth and by the faithful witness of his subjects.

In any inquiry into the nature of the Israel of God we study the Scriptures.  In them we see that Yahveh left record of many historic intentions for national/ genetically-defined Israel.   We see that Israel was first described by God in the promises to Abraham, first formed explicitly into a holy people for God under the Sinai covenant in the desert of the exodus.  There in the desert, however, Yahveh’s dialogue with his people revealed that Israel, the holy people of God, has existence on two levels – one might even say in two separate worlds.

The most apparent use of the term “Israel” is to denote that aggregation of families and genetic descendants of Abraham’s grandson, Jacob, who received from Yahveh the elevated name Israel, meaning “he who struggles with God.”  When Jacob’s family entered Egypt seventy strong, they were by then “the children of Israel.”  By the time they were ready to leave Egypt, four centuries later, the number of the children of Israel was closer to one million.  It was a group defined by genetics and culture, but not so narrowly defined that it could not take into its number individuals from other genetic groups.  While in Egypt, some children of Jacob possibly followed the example of Joseph and married Egyptian mates.  Joseph married Asenath, the daughter of an Egyptian priest.  As the children of Israel left Egypt their number was augmented by the addition of those Egyptians who preferred to remain with the Hebrew people.  Moses’ wife, Zipporah, was from Midian, essentially Ethiopian.

This exodus assembly was the original body of people to whom Yahveh introduced his covenant code, the parameters of fealty to their divine King such as would make possible the subject – king relationship.  Through Moses, Yahveh made it clear to his people that mere descent from the patriarchs fell far short of the parameter necessary for participation in the true Israel of Yahveh.  As made clear in the 29th chapter of Deuteronomy, in order to gain inclusion in the covenant people of God, Yahveh demanded something called “the circumcision of the heart,” the individual heart given in love and fealty and obedience to the living God.  Yahveh was cultivating a people for himself.  Men are made free, in the image of God; therefore the true child of God must come to him in freedom, not by the mechanism of genetic selection, and not through compulsion.  On the one hand, there is a people to which God has revealed himself, and on the other hand there are the individuals who seek his face.  As Paul said,

“Not all who are descended from Israel are Israel…it is not the natural children who are God’s children, but it is the children of the promise.”[5]


A man is not a Jew if he is only one outwardly, nor is circumcision merely outward and physical.  No, a man is a Jew if he is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code.  Such a man’s praise is not from men, but from God.[6]

When Yeshua came into the world, this understanding was strongly reinforced.  John the Baptist, announcing the coming of the Messiah of Israel, was interrogated by Pharisees and by the leaders of the Temple.  They held that the kingdom of Yahveh was coextensive with national Israel.   John, skeptical of their intentions, asked them why they had come to see him: did they think that he was bringing a message of Messianic hope for everyone genetically favored to be born into national Israel?  John assured them that this was not the case.

John essentially said to them, “If God wants mere descendants of Abraham, he can make them out of local stones.”  John said that his message rather was for those who are ready for repentance, metanoia, abandoning the heart of rebellion in favor of true fealty to the Messiah, the eternal king of Israel.  The Pharisees, the zealots, and others were looking for a leader who would take the status quo nation into days of national glory and free them from the yoke of Rome.  But Yeshua was looking for an elite to inhabit the eternal holy kingdom of Yahveh.  Addressing this question of participation in the real kingdom of God, Yeshua gave the final answer:

I am the way, the truth and the life.  No one comes to the Father except through me.”[7]

Apart from the Messiah of Israel there is no Israel of God.

There is, of course, a cultural Israel which is the product of a genetic history, and which is loved and favored by God for the efforts of the patriarchs and ancestors to understand and ingest the divine imperative.  [“…showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments[8]…]  But there is something else: there is transcendent Israel, the holy [“set apart,” “devoted”] people of God, which exists only in and through individual fealty to the Messiah of Israel.  Yeshua came to announce the substantial reality of this re-engineered kingdom of God.  He is Lord and King of the holy nation, transcendent Israel. 

This issue is not easy to confront, on the one hand because the name “Israel” is now attached to a very powerful secular Zionist state which carefully manages the public dialogue and in this century has insinuated itself, by wealth, by stealth, and by war, into the land which has been known as Palestine for the last two thousand years.  This new state is intimately bound to our own country, the United States of America.  This is the secular, geo-political import of the name Israel in the modern consciousness.

Meanwhile, there is a world-historical imperative bound to the name Israel which is at once sacred and political.  Through centuries of prophecy the name of Israel is attached to the great promise to Abraham, the very hope of human history, the divine promise that someday the people of God will know the rule and peace of God in an actual Messianic kingdom in the land of promise.

Our witness must be to stand for the truth and present reality of the transcendent kingdom of Yeshua, transcendent Israel, more real and more powerful than all the kingdoms of the earth, no less real for abstaining from its ultimate possession of dust and stone in the land of promise, no less real for being “Spiritual,” for Spirit, in particular the Spirit of Yahveh, is the ultimate power:

“’Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit,’ saith Yahveh.”

This political vision becomes the need to relate to Yeshua as Lord and King of Messianic Israel.   Somehow he must be known within the culture and covenants of transcendent Israel, and therein lies the call to come to terms with the seventh day Sabbath of the 4th commandment and to question the Sunday worship initiated [borrowed from pagan worship] and sanctioned by the Catholic church.

For myself, having been raised in the church and knowing many people who have loved God and have worshipped him on Sunday, I found it very awkward and disconcerting that I should contemplate a turn to worship on Saturday, a day which I associated with baseball, skiing, and raking leaves.  Even more awkward was the peculiarity that the Hebrew Sabbath begins at sundown on Friday and ends in the evening of the following day.  I found it curious to contemplate that whenever I would visit a church on Sunday, I would not be worshipping on my Sabbath.  Conversely, most synagogues available to me would have lovely Sabbath rituals, yet never mention in awe the name of the true Messiah of Israel.

At length I made the change to the ancient Sabbath as I despaired of the incredible apostasy of the Chicago churches through which I had searched over a period of twelve years.  Often I would think of the song, “I would rather be in His world, than without Him in mine.”  I would rather know the true fabric of my historic kingdom and walk alone, than be surrounded by smiling faces in a context conjured by the magicians of Catholicism.

The change having been made, now many years ago, the seventh day Sabbath and all its peculiarities have become the treasured possession of myself and my family, a Sabbath which opens in the home with the ancient Friday evening ceremony of lighting the lights of Sabbath, recitation of traditional blessings, sharing in bread and wine, and reading from God’s word.  It is no longer associated with trivial weekend chores and pleasures.  It is a gift from God, a link into the most ancient traditions of the people of God, and it owns an indestructible peace which can not be taken away.



Does it really matter?

If a change of Sabbath is difficult, because of the weight and pull of tradition, because good people seem to get along perfectly well in the embrace of ancient, long- approved rituals, even though their origins are murky, so then will we find reconsideration of Christmas to be difficult, for the very same reasons.

We might ask, Why bother?  The quick answer is that we must give it consideration because history matters, and celebrations which spurn the true word of God and spurn the true history of our God’s dealings with his people – these things efface and destroy our history.  Furthermore I will try to show that they not only efface our history, they obscure our vision of the future.

The modern church is deeply anti-historical.  It mostly ignores the truth that Yeshua came into the world on a foundation of centuries of expectation, appeared in the land of promise in satisfaction of the deep anticipation of the few, the faithful of Israel.[9]  Beginning with Constantine, the official imperial church drove into obscurity those who held to the Saturday Sabbath, the feasts of Israel and an interpretation of Scripture which discounted the increasing authority of the church hierarchy.  The Catholic institution, since the 4th century, has abandoned its roots in Israel, and, in modern times, abandons even the Ten Commandments of the Sinai Covenant as an adjunct to the ancient history of “the Jews.”  The Catholic institution has even redacted the commandments and considers them not as the terms of a holy covenant but merely as a standard of moral behavior.

Before pursuing an inquiry into why the consideration of Christmas matters, we should ask why our perception of the Sabbath matters.  The seventh day Sabbath matters, first of all, because it is the clear and explicit covenant expectation of the God to whom we belong in covenant loyalty:

Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy.  Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath to Yahveh your God.  On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your manservant or maidservant, nor your animals, nor the alien within your gates.  For in six days Yahveh made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day.  Therefore Yahveh blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.”

In the commandment itself, Yahveh pauses to explain the reason for the commandment, that “day number seven,” following the six days of creation, was a holy day set apart to God.  Yahveh could have created the world in six days and gone on straight from there.  But he did not.  With the seventh day our God, immediately following the work of creation, completed the meaning of creation by introducing the element of holy time.  Time is six parts mundane time and one part holy time.  This sacred proportion was established in the week of creation.  It is the design of Yahveh that every week of earth time is so established.  The “week” of months begins in the month of Passover and ends in the seventh month of the High Holy Days. The “week” of world history is to be the same: six millennia of secular history to be followed by the holy time of the Millennium in which our Messiah will rule all the earth from Jerusalem.  Our observance of the seventh day Sabbath teaches us the importance of holy time, past, present, and future.

The observation and honor of God’s holy time also keeps us cognizant of something more immediately important to our preservation: the understanding that we the people of Yahveh are a holy people, set apart to God.  We do not belong to the world.  We are in the world, but we are not of the world, not mundane.  We have been redeemed.  Our Messiah has bought us for himself at the price of his own blood.  We are called to live as set apart, like the Sabbath, for our God.  Our honor of the Sabbath day which He has chosen is an acknowledgement of the truth that it is nothing we do but He alone who redeems, who separates us for himself, who makes us holy.





Nostalgia and the measure of Christmas

I cannot think of Christmas without remembering enchanted days in childhood, with the world made new in snow and the home filled with life by the presence of the tree and good holiday food and presents and friends and extended family.  With some effort, there would be celebrations at the church with shepherds and wise men and readings from the gospels to tell the story of Christmas, and the choir robed in its best, singing the rich repertoire of Christmas songs, and in it all we would see ourselves in a state of actual anticipation of the birth of Jesus.

I also remember a midnight mass on Christmas Eve in Vietnam with the church full of worshippers and revelers and a great excess of participants filling the street.  The curfew had been discarded and literally the whole town was present.  It seemed as if Christmas had overtaken the world.

I remember a Christmas Eve mass in the tiny village of Les Baux, France, where, at midnight, according to tradition, a shepherd entered the back of the stone church, lit only by candles,  guiding one of his sheep who pulled a cart full of straw, in the midst of which lay a doll representing the newborn Jesus.  I felt that I was as close as one could get to that ancient moment, short of Christmas Eve in Bethlehem.

I remember Christmas Eve in the great basilica in Montreal, surrounded by a crush of worshippers, feeling that the entire city had forced its way inside in order to not fail to mark the moment.  And another Christmas Eve in Montreal in the old cathedral on the square, listening to a great sung mass.  Each of these celebrations seemed to fulfill their promise, to mark a moment in divine history and to include me in it.

But in these celebrations, What was real?  Was there a real correspondence between me as a person of faith honoring an historic event, an actual anniversary of the birth of Yeshua on that day?  Was the event an exercise of real faith, a recognition of the historic fabric crafted by the hand of God, a heart yielded in honor of the God who enters history on our behalf?

In most of those celebrations I had little faith at all that could count as faith in the God of history.  My object of worship was a fuzzy idea of divinity that was being sustained by candles and incense and song.  I had a sense of belonging to something wonderful, but it was based in theater and wishful thinking.  And the day given for celebration had no known connection to the birth of our king.

Is not Christmas supposed to be grounded in the historical person of Christ?  How do we get there? Does God expect us to get there from Christmas?

I have come to the conclusion that there is no objective measure by which to determine what God expects for us in Christmas, since he has never asked us to set aside a day uniquely for the commemoration of the birth of Yeshua, and certainly he has never asked us to borrow a date from pagan worship.



Celebration of the life of our king without a debt to paganism

It is common knowledge that nearly every facet and ritual of Christmas has pagan origins, and that the date, December 25, follows the revelries of Roman Saturnalia and is precisely the day of the Roman dies Natalis of Sol Invictus, Birthday of the Unconquerable Sun, entwined with December 25 as the birthday of Mithras, who was known as Deus Solo Invictus Mithras.  The architects of the Roman marriage between empire and church – Aurelian, Constantine, Justinian, and a long succession of Popes — contrived to superimpose Christmas over the ancient pagan celebrations in an attempt to let their Christians feel “like other people” and establish Christianity as the religion of the realm. There is a margin note in a manuscript of the 12th c. Syrian bishop Jacob Bar – Salibi which reads as follows:

“It was a custom of the Pagans to celebrate on the same 25 December the birthday of the Sun, at which they kindled lights in token of festivity.  In these solemnities and revelries the Christians also took part.  Accordingly, when the doctors of the church perceived that the Christians had a leaning to this festival, they took counsel and resolved that the true Nativity should be solemnised on that day.”

Boughs of greens, yule logs, evergreen trees, holly, mistletoe, all have their roots in pre-Christian pagan tradition, even back into the times of ancient Babylon.  Jeremiah spoke out against these pagan celebrations:

“For the customs of the peoples are futile; for one cuts a tree from the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the ax.  They decorate it with silver and gold; they fasten it with nails and hammers so that it will not topple.”[10]

“Christ” is the Greek form of the Hebrew “Mashiach,” meaning Anointed King, which we render in English as Messiah.  The very name “Christmas” [Mass for Christ] is a foul misuse of the royal title of our king, as the mass itself is an obscenity in which the Catholic church pretends first to conjure the very being of God into the “Eucharistic” wafer and then holds the very being of God to “a bloodless sacrifice”, hardly a celebration of the moment of divine incarnation.  They dispense this “body of God” to their supplicants as a counterfeit for the true Spirit of God which He desires to be present within us.

Scripture cautions us against romanticizing man-made traditions as if they were true celebrations of the being of our God.  Yeshua said to the leaders of the Temple:

“These people draw near to me with their mouth…but their heart is far from me.  And in vain they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.”[11]

Or, as Mark recorded it,

“All too well you reject the commandment of God, that you may keep your tradition.”[12]

Do we not fear to think that we might fall into such a category?  Do we not wish to examine God’s word and our own habits in order to know that we are focused, not on empty, if colorful, apostate traditions, but on the very cultural and historic fabric crafted for us by our God?  If only our search could lead us to the celebration of the coming of our king in a manner that is rooted in true history and owes nothing to the enemies of our God.

Yeshua on earth only gave the command for one celebration, the commemoration of the covenant sacrifice of his body and blood through a rite of drinking the wine of the cup of blessing and eating the unleavened bread of Passover.  However, this does not mean that he had any thought that we would abandon the historic feasts of Israel.  Although he did not command us to keep the Sabbath, he kept the Sabbath, even though his Sabbath works of love disturbed those who had turned it into a day of empty ritual.  We have God’s promise that the Sabbath and even the new moon festivals endure forever:

“As the heavens and the new earth that I make will endure before me,” declares Yahveh, “so will your name and descendants endure.  From one New Moon to another and from one Sabbath to another, all mankind will come and bow down before me,” says Yahveh.”[13]

Ezekiel explains how Sabbaths, New Moons and Passover will be celebrated during the coming Millennium.[14]  Hosea suggests that the Feast of Tabernacles [Sukkot] will be celebrated in the Millennium.[15]  Zechariah states directly that the Feast of Tabernacles will be a major universal celebration during the Millennium:

“Then the survivors from all the nations that have attacked Jerusalem will go up year after year to worship the King, Yahveh Almighty, and to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles.”[16]

We will also consider how it is that the entire mission of Yeshua on earth is so woven into the Feast of Passover that it is difficult to imagine how our God might discard this sacred appointment.

There is no basis in all the world for imagining that the feasts which God gave our ancient people through Moses should somehow become irrelevant for us today.   Nor do we have any reason to oppose them.  The problem is, of course, our cultural attachment to Christmas and Easter, our tragic lack of familiarity with the historic feasts, and our failure to understand how they relate to Yeshua our king.

The church has disengaged itself from Israel and ignores the feasts, while prevalent currents of Judaism behave as if the feasts are exclusively appropriate to a belief which fails to recognize its Messiah.  Both visions leave us undone.

We must look at the seven historic feasts which were given to us by God himself.  We may find in them celebrations which root us in our past and lead us to our Messiah.  Through the perspective of mystical meaning and prophecy we may find in the seven feasts a synopsis of sacred history and a portrait of our Messiah… something of eternal grandeur and truth, something which could never be contained in a borrowed pagan festival with church trimmings.



PART II.  Time, the Calendar, and The Seven Feasts of Israel.



Time and planetary motion

The seven feasts of Israel are seven mo’edim, “appointments” between man and God.  They have specific locations in a calendar defined by the periodic movement of heavenly bodies.  We enter into the discussion of the feasts of Israel by first taking stock of time, the Hebrew calendar, and the references which define it.

Earth time begins in the measure of the orbit of the moon around the earth and of the orbit of the earth around the sun.  Measurable earth time began on the fourth day of creation:

“And God said, ‘Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate the day from the    night, and let them serve as signs to mark seasons and days and years, and let them be lights in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth.’ …God made two great lights – the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night.  He also made the stars.  God set them in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth, to govern the day and the night,[17]  and to separate light from darkness.”  Genesis 1.14-18

The earth and the other planets of the solar system are held in the gravitational pull of the sun and so move within an orbital plane which passes through the center of the sun.  The orbit of the moon about the earth lies in a plane which varies slightly from the earth’s orbital plane, at an inclination of about five degrees.  In  the greater plane of our solar system all the conjunctions and eclipses occur … Venus in alignment between earth and sun, the eclipse of the sun as it is obscured by the passage of the moon, the reddening of the moon as it passes through the umbral shadow of the earth.  This greater orbital plane is therefore called the plane of the “ecliptic.”

Around us the sphere of the heavens sits as a relatively unchanging arrangement of distant stars and galaxies.  Since earliest times these points of light have been seen to possess an order, described with some variation as intimations of animals, warriors, maidens, and artifacts.  If we should wish to track our progress around the sun, we may do so by considering the position of the sun upon the backdrop of the stars just before sunrise on each day of the year.

The observation of the sun on the horizon each morning reveals that it travels always within a narrow band of stars…. those stars in line with the plane of the ecliptic through which we travel around the sun.  This band of stars, seen as a belt around the heavens, seen as the road through which the sun travels, is called the zodiac.  Since ancient times this belt has been divided into twelve parts or “houses.”

We gauge our path through the heavens by observing each day the progression of the sun through the twelve houses of the Zodiac.

“…He has set a tabernacle for the sun, which is like a bridegroom coming out of his    chamber, and rejoices like a strong man to run its race.  Its rising is from one end of heaven, and its circuit to the other end.”[18]

One complete circuit of the earth around the sun, beginning from a certain point and returning to that point, forms the measure of what we call a year.  In that period of time the earth turns on its axis approximately 365.25 full rotations, or “days.”  In nearly that time, 354 days, the moon makes twelve orbits around the earth, each lasting roughly 29.5 days.  These orbits of the moon around the earth are the foundation of our months.

The division of our yearly motion is further distinguished by seasonal differences which result from the tilt of the earth’s axis with regard to the plane of our orbit around the sun.  Since the waver of earth’s axis of rotation is imperceptible in a year, during one extreme of the orbital circuit our north pole is leaned into the sun, while at the opposite extreme our pole is canted away from the sun.  At the intermediate nodes the sun sees both hemispheres equally.  The extremes are called the summer and winter solstices and the intermediate nodes are the equinoxes.  These moments divide the year into four equal portions of time.

Most people assume that the year has always had the same length of days, at 365.25 rotations of the earth, but there is considerable evidence that there have been cataclysms affecting the velocity of the passage of the earth around the sun, such as might be achieved by allowing that bodies of considerable mass might enter our solar system and pass very near the earth, applying a gravitational pull in favor of acceleration or retardation.

That Enoch [3300 B.C. to 3000 B.C.] had a year of 364.8 days could be derived from his statement that “In 8 years the moon falls behind 80 days.”[19]  Enoch also said that “In the days of the sinners the years shall be shortened, and men shall err and take the stars to be gods.”[20]  The flood to wipe away sin came in 2274 B.C.  Following that time Noah is recorded as counting a period of five months as having 150 days, suggesting a 30 x 12 or 360 day year.[21]  Then, following the time in the 8th c. B.C. when Yahveh “made the shadow go back the ten steps it had gone down on the sundial of Ahaz — ” recorded as a sign to Hezekiah — from that time civilizations all over the earth began adjusting their calendars, apparently to take account of a new extension of the orbital time to a duration of 365.2422 rotations.  Additionally, there are hints that there might come another change to the length of the year at some time in the future.  There is some suggestion in Revelation that days “might be shortened” once again “as in the days of Noah,” producing the precise prescription of 42 months equaling 1260 days and equaling 3 ½ years, as suggested in Revelation 11.2,3,4 and in Revelation 12.6.




Moses and the Hebrew calendar

It seems that Moses inherited the Sumerian /Babylonian calendar as his primary reference, possibly holding to it as cultural artifact from Abraham and Sumer.  At any rate, at the time of the Exodus, Yahveh addressed Moses in the context of something resembling the Sumerian/ Babylonian luni-solar calendar.

A luni-solar calendar attempts to keep its months in sync with the orbits of the moon around the earth, so that the first of each month will be marked with the first crescent of the new moon and the middle of each month will be the time of the full moon.  Meanwhile, being also a solar calendar, it attempts to make periodic adjustments to keep the year tuned to the seasons and the earth’s orbital period around the sun.  It takes the moon 29.531 days to orbit the earth.  So lunar months are fudged back and forth between 29 and 30 days to keep calendar and lunar motion in sync.  Since 29.5 x 12 = 354, eleven days short of the solar circuit, it is necessary to add in about eleven days of adjustment per year to keep the yearly period true to the seasons and our orbit around the sun.   The Sumerians did this by adding an extra month every few years.

It is possible that Moses was familiar with the use of this calendar in Egypt.  Ancient Egypt seems to have maintained at least three calendars: a 360 day calendar, a luni-solar calendar, and a star calendar which connected the annual flooding of the Nile with the rising of the star Sirius.[22]

The Hebrew calendar, as ordained by Yahveh and as brought into usage by Moses, has Sumerian-style lunar months and interjects, over a 19 year period, exactly seven intercalary months.  Over the centuries, in an attempt to make calendars more conveniently predictive, men have made their calendars depend more on refinements of calculation and less on observation.  However, the Hebrew calendar is interested both in periodic accuracy and in the capacity of the calendar to be a memorial and a predictor of events which Yahveh himself has attached to the periodic movements of the heavenly bodies.  So the Hebrew calendar, while it flexes the lengths of the solar years to remain faithful to the lunar periods, it also checks its accuracy every nineteen years according to the phenomenon known as the Metonic cycle.

Meton of Athens [5th c. B.C.] observed and recorded what was already a long- recognized synchronization: every nineteen years the sun, moon, and earth return to the “same” relative location.  More specifically, in a count of 6,940 days [and a few hours] two events coincide: The earth completes 19 orbits of the sun and the moon completes 235 orbits of the earth.  Since 19 years of 12 months equals only 228 months, the Hebrew calendar interjects exactly 7 additional “intercalary” months [each called Adar II] over the nineteen year period, at which point calendar and nature are again in confirmed agreement.

From this short study we can see that the Hebrew calendar is as interested in accuracy as any calendar in history, and that, unlike the Gregorian calendar, it devotes itself to recognizing the significant events in the interrelated motions of earth, sun, and moon.  It is a calendar rooted both in science and in nature, both in calculation and in observation.  We will see then how it is rooted not only in science and nature but also in the history of the world, past, present, and future.




The calendar of planetary cycles as matrix of sacred history

The passage of time and the measurement of time are of great importance to our God.  Prophesy of future events is often in terms of unique increments of time.  The history of the holy people contains a detailed record of the passing of time.

Yahveh undertook with Abraham the beginning of the most important program in history, the redemption of a people for himself, and yet in that very beginning he announced to Abraham a coming time of interruption:

“Know for certain that your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own, and they will be enslaved and mistreated four hundred years.  …but afterward they will come out.”[23]

Abraham’s grandson, Jacob, followed his own son, Joseph, into Egypt.  Altogether they were seventy strong.  Joseph was a blessing to Egypt, but with the passage of time his deeds were forgotten and the strength of his children was considered a threat.  The Egyptians overtook them and enslaved them.  Yahveh then remembered his covenant with Abraham and his children.  He stirred the heart of Moses to hear His voice and to look to the delivery of his people from Egypt.  Yahveh had in mind that the Exodus of His people was to come about at a very specific moment.

Yahveh instructed Moses to represent His intentions to Pharaoh, and to interpret to Pharaoh the grave series of plagues meant to convince Pharaoh to let the children of Jacob go free.  A final plague, the passage of the angel of death through the houses of Egypt, would prove to be the effective evidence of the power of Yahveh and of the futility of refusing to recognize his authority over his creation.  The morning following that horrible plague of death the children of Jacob were on their way out of Egypt.  It is recorded that,

The length of time the Israelite people lived in Egypt was 430 years.  At the end of    the 430 years, to the very day, all Yahveh’s divisions left Egypt.  Because Yahveh kept vigil that night to bring them out of Egypt, on this night all the Israelites are to keep vigil to honor Yahveh for the generations to come.”[24]

Yahveh carefully instructed Moses in his intentions for this night.  And on that occasion Yahveh laid out his intentions for a new calendar of holy appointments between Yahveh and his people.

The count of years from the week of Creation maintains Tishri, a month in autumn, as the first month of creation, and Tishri remains as the first month of the Hebrew civil calendar.  However, Yahveh came to Moses toward the climax of the plagues over Egypt, in the month of Nisan [in spring, six months separate from Tishri], very possibly on the first day of the month, when the crescent of the new moon first appears, and at that moment Yahveh gave Moses the parameters of a new sacred calendar for Israel:

“This month [Nisan] is to be for you the first month, the first month of your year.  Tell the whole community of Israel that on the tenth day of this month each man is to take a lamb for his family, one for each household.  If any household is too small for a whole lamb, they must share one with their nearest neighbor, having taken into account the number of people there are….The animals you choose must be year-old males without defect, …Take care of them until the fourteenth day of the month, when all the people of the community of Israel must slaughter them at twilight.[25]  Then they are to take some of the blood and put it on the sides and tops of the doorframes of the houses where they eat the lambs.  That same night they are to eat the meat roasted over the fire, along with bitterherbs, and bread made without yeast….Eat in haste; it is Yahveh’s Passover.  On that same night I will pass through Egypt and strike down every firstborn – both men and animals – and will bring judgment on all the gods of Egypt.  I am Yahveh.  The blood will be a sign for you on the houses where you are; and when I see the blood, I   will pass over you.  …This is a day you are to commemorate; for the generations     to come you shall celebrate it as a festival [appointment] to Yahveh – a lasting ordinance.  For seven days you are to eat bread made without yeast. …On the first day  hold a sacred   assembly and another one on the seventh day.  Do no work at all on these     days, except to prepare food for everyone to eat – that is all you may do.  Celebrate the feast of Unleavened Bread, because it was on this very day that I brought your divisions out of Egypt.  Celebrate this day as a lasting ordinance for the generations to come.  In the first month you are to eat bread made without yeast, from the evening of the  fourteenth day until the evening of the twenty-first day.”                     Exodus 12, excerpts

With the establishment of Passover [now to fall forevermore on a night when the moon is full] Yahveh had set in place the foundation of the Seven Feasts of Israel.  Immediately conjoined to Passover are two other feasts, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and the Feast of Firstfruits.  Then, counting from Passover seven weeks comes the fourth festival, the Feast of Weeks.  In the seventh month [Tishri, the first month of the civil year] come the High Holy Days and the last three feasts: on 1 Tishri the Feast of Trumpets, on 10 Tishri the Day of Atonement, and from 15 to 21 Tishri the Feast of Tabernacles.

In looking at the seven feasts we are able to consider that they reveal their importance on multiple levels.  They are not celebrations chosen by the people. They are festival appointments installed in history by the dictate of Yahveh to his people.  They exist as covenant memorials of events in our sacred history.  They exist as prophetic appointments of future historical events, some already fulfilled, others yet to be fulfilled.  They, as an assembly, describe the critical moments of the involvement of Yahveh in human history from the Day of Creation to the great apocalyptic Day of the Lord, with Yeshua our Messiah at the center of that history.




Passover, the first and fundamental feast

The focal point of the Passover celebration is a ritual dinner recalling the elements of the first Passover meal in Egypt.  It is prepared on the 14th of Nisan and is eaten in the evening at the beginning of 15 Nisan.[26]  At that time the moon is full.  [The light of it would have been of great assistance in the exodus from Egypt.]  The Feast of Unleavened Bread Begins within Passover in these first hours of the 15th  of Nisan.  During the day of preparation, on the 14th, all items containing leaven have been removed from the house.  For the coming seven days only unleavened bread is eaten.

The Passover meal is a memorial of the Exodus of our people from slavery, a release achieved by the power of Yahveh.  As such it is a celebration in memory of a past event.  But it also bears within it the seeds of something unfinished, something future.  In the context of the Exodus Yahveh had made a vast promise through Moses:

“Therefore, say to the Israelites: ‘I am Yahveh, and I will bring you out from under the yoke of the Egyptians.  I will free you from being slaves to them, and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm and with mighty acts of judgment.  I will take you as my own   people, and I will be your God…..And I will bring you to the land I swore with uplifted hand to give to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob.’”[27]

In the events of the Exodus we see Yahveh free his people through mighty acts of judgment.    But he is not only freeing them from slavery.  He is gathering them to himself as his own people, and he is promising to secure them within the great promise of history, the promise to Abraham.

In addition, this promise through Moses claims that Yahveh is “redeeming” his people.  Redemption denotes the paying of a debt in exchange for which one takes possession of something.  The Exodus is always spoken of as the Redemption of Israel.  But where is the redemption?  They owed nothing to Pharaoh or his people.  No ransom was paid in Egypt.  Who owed what?  Who paid what?

Yahveh had warned that the angel of death would pass over Egypt and bring death to every family that did not have the blood of the lamb over their doorway.  This warning implied that every person, Jew and Gentile alike, owed his life to the mercy of Yahveh, which was to say that all deserved death.   Those lambs brought into the dwellings of Israel on the 10th of Nisan appeared to be the only ones paying the price to spare Israel from the judgment of the angel of death.  But Moses and every other person with an ounce of reflection knew that the blood of a yearling lamb was no tally for the debt they owed to the God who was setting them free from slavery and from the immediate threat of death.

Passover, then, called for them to look beyond yearling lambs to the dreadful ransom that would be given for their lives.  Passover called out the future.  It called out to the groan of Yeshua upon the cross, the sacrifice of the Lamb which truly frees from sin and death.  And, as the Abrahamic promise is reaffirmed within it, Passover, now as then, still calls out the hope of that Day when we shall sit at table together with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.




The Feast of Unleavened Bread

The seven days of Unleavened Bread are a memorial to the way our people exited from Egypt, hastily, with no time to be setting loaves out to rise.  The celebration is also a sober commandment, including a warning[28]that whoever eats leavened bread during this time should be cut off from Israel.  Why so serious?  Leaven in the New Testament is equated with sin.  Leaven is something which, though small, enters the loaf and transforms its nature.  Israel was being gathered to God, and already their sin and unworthiness were made apparent by the grace with which a holy God was gathering his children to himself.  Yahveh associated with Passover this call to remember the need in our lives to be separated from that sin which can overtake us and undo our lives.  Again we are pointed to the gracious mercy of our God, who alone can absolve us of our sin and, through his Spirit, maintain our hearts as separated from the world and devoted to him.




The Feast of Firstfruits

The Feast of Firstfruits is also appended to the Feast of Passover. On the day after the Sabbath of the week of Unleavened Bread there is to be a ceremony which acknowledges the inception of the yearly harvest:

“Yahveh said to Moses, “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘When you enter the  land I am going to give you and you reap its harvest, bring to the priest a sheaf of the first grain you harvest.  He is to wave the sheaf before Yahveh so it will be accepted on  your behalf; the priest is to wave it on the day after the Sabbath. …This is to be a lasting ordinance for the generations to come, wherever you live.”[29]

This festival seems quite straightforward, with no obvious suggestion that it portends any future event.  The Feast of Firstfruits, so commanded, lay in place over centuries, until there came an event of such magnitude that it resonated against this day and the people of Yahveh were ever more certain that it is their God alone who watches over them.




The Feast of Weeks [Shavuot/ Pentecost]

The fourth feast sits at the center of symmetry between the spring feasts and the fall feasts.  It also is counted with reference to Passover.  The Feast of Weeks, known as Shavuot and Pentecost, is counted from the day of Firstfruits…seven weeks up to the day after the Sabbath of the seventh week, making fifty days from the day of Firstfruits.  The counting of these fifty days is in itself a daily ritual, and is called “the counting of the omer.”

“From the day after the Sabbath, the day you brought the sheaf of the wave offering, count off seven full weeks.  Count off fifty days up to the day after the seventh Sabbath,   and then present an offering of new grain to Yahveh.  From wherever you live, bring two loaves made of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour, baked with yeast, as a wave offering of firstfruits to Yahveh….On that same day you are to proclaim a sacred assembly and do no regular work.  This is to be a lasting ordinance for the generations to me, wherever you live.”[30]

The days of counting the omer are the days of the passage into the wilderness, from Egypt to Mt. Sinai.  By nearly every interpretation of the Biblical record of the counting of days on the way to Sinai, on the fiftieth day the children of Israel were at the foot of Mt. Sinai.  Although it is not definitively inscribed as such, Rabbinic scholars have held that the fiftieth day was the day Yahveh gave the law to Moses on Mt. Sinai.  Yahveh came down onto the mountain enshrouded in smoke and fire and spoke aloud the core commandments of the covenant.  After Moses received the remaining commandments from Yahveh and wrote them down, he offered burnt offerings and sacrificed young bulls as fellowship offerings to Yahveh.

“Then he took the Book of the Covenant and read it to the people.  They responded, ‘We will do everything Yahveh has said; we will obey.’ Moses then took the blood, sprinkled it on the people and said, ‘This is the blood of the covenant that Yahveh has made with you in accordance with all these words.’”[31]

This is the covenant by which Israel was transformed from a large clan of descendants into a people, subjects of God their King.  It was at this moment that Yahveh revealed to his people something of his majesty, inviting Moses and the seventy elders to come up into his presence and eat a memorial covenant meal:

“Moses and Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, and the seventy elders of Israel went up and saw the God of Israel.  Under his feet was something like a pavement made of sapphire, clear as the sky itself.  But God did not raise his hand against these leaders of the Israelites; they saw God, and they ate and drank.”[32]

This moment then is the formative moment of the people of Israel and the climactic day of Shavuot is equally the anniversary of the giving of the law of the covenant and the anniversary of the formation of Israel as a covenant people.  It is a beautiful and straightforward memorial, ordained by Yahveh.

However, when we go back to consider the elements of its celebration, mystery enters in.  Two loaves of leavened bread are to be waved as an offering before Yahveh.  Why?  Time would tell.  There would come a day when the civilizations of Greece and Rome would make a powerful mix with the culture of Israel, and Shavuot would become known as Pentecost, and the giving of the law at Sinai would become, in Jerusalem, an event in the eyes of the nations: the giving of the law within the heart.




The Feast of Trumpets [Yom Teruah]

In counting forward six months from 1 Nisan we pass through the months of Iyyar, Sivan, Tammuz, Av, Elul [the sixth month, a time of preparation for the events to come], and we arrive in the seventh month, Tishri.  Here begin the High Holy Days, and their scale of reference is grand.

On 1 Tishri, the day of the new moon of Tishri, Yahveh established through Moses Yom Teruah, the Feast of Trumpets.

Yahveh said to Moses, “Say to the Israelites: ‘On the first day of the seventh month you are to have a day of rest, a sacred assembly commemorated with trumpet blasts.  Do no regular work, but present an offering made to Yahveh by fire.”[33]

First and foremost it is a day chosen by God for teruah, the mournful and penetrating sound of the shofar.  Amos wrote, “When the shofar is sounded in a town, do the people not take alarm?”[34]  The sound of the shofar can inspire both fear and repentance.  Yom Teruah, the Feast of Trumpets, is the beginning of the Days of Awe, up until the Day of Atonement on 10 Tishri.

In the commands to Moses, in the Torah, there is no direct connection between Yom Teruah and any past event, other than the command of Yahveh that it be commemorated each year.  However, ancient tradition has bound this day to the sixth day of Creation, the day upon which Adam and Eve were created.  Therefore 1 Tishri is, from early times, the birthday of humanity.  As the day which is the ultimate starting point of human history, in the first year of human history, 1 Tishri is then also the head of the civil year, Rosh Hashanah. 

Rosh Hashanah is the anniversary of the kingship of our God over his creation.  [As also the kings of Israel count the beginnings of their reigns from 1 Tishri, in recognition of the fact that they are nothing more than caretakers on behalf of the One eternal King on the eternal heavenly throne over Israel.]

“When Adam first opened his eyes and human consciousness was born, he immediately understood that the LORD created all things, including himself.  According to midrash, Adam’s first words were  ‘Adonai malakh olam va’ed: The LORD is King for ever and ever.’ [Exodus 15.18].  God then said, ‘Now the whole world will know       that I am King’ and he was very pleased….The birthday of humanity is therefore the Coronation Day for the King of the Universe.  Psalm 47 celebrates the Kingship of God that mentions the ‘shout’ [teruah] and shofar blast of God’s coronation:  ‘God has gone up with a shout [teruah], the LORD with the sound of a trumpet [shofar].’        [Psalm 47.54][35]

So Rosh Hashanah stands as a feast commemorative of the birth of the world while retaining its primary nature as Yom Teruah, Feast of Trumpets, the call to repentance in preparation for the Day of Atonement.  It will come in the last part of our study to consider how Yahveh will uniquely use this day to affirm his being and exercise his kingship.




The Day of Atonement

Yahveh designated 10 Tishri as the Day of Atonement, Yom Kippur.  “Kippur” comes from the root “Kaphar” as used in Psalm 49.7,8 to mean “redeem” or “pay a ransom” to God for a man:

“It [riches/ wealth] cannot redeem a man, or pay his ransom [kaphro] to God…”[36]

Therefore, while Passover describes the sacrifice by which our king paid the price for our sinfulness, the Day of Atonement describes the moment at the end of our days, at the end of the era, when we stand before God and the Book of Life is opened.  At that moment we stand before him with nothing hidden – our lives, our faith, our lack of faith, and the mercy of our Redeemer – in the gravity of knowing that as his children, only by his stripes were we healed.  Only by his death are we at this moment rescued, bought back, redeemed from the fate of death.

“The conqueror I will allow to eat from the tree of Life which is within the paradise of   God….Be faithful though you have to die for it and I will give you the crown of             life….The conqueror shall not be injured by the second death….I will never erase his name from the Book of Life but will own him openly before my Father and his angels.”[37]

Yahveh told Moses, “Atonement is to be made once a year for all of the Israelites.”[38]  10 Tishri is the day in which Israel stands before Yahveh in recognition that only by his covering of our sinfulness may we come to be in his presence.  Where Passover contains all the joy of sudden release, The Day of Atonement stands austere, even dreadful, as if at the summary moment of our lives.

Yom Kippur is the most solemn of all the seven appointments…prepared through the Days of Awe and now ending in a day of compulsory fasting and appearing before God in sacred assembly.

“On the tenth day of the seventh month you must deny yourselves and not do any work …because on this day atonement will be made for you to cleanse you….It is a Sabbath of rest and you must deny yourselves [fast]; it is a lasting ordinance…[39]

During the time of the Tabernacle and Temple, the high priest entered the Holy of Holies and presented the blood of sacrifice on this day for his own sin and for the sins of Israel.  This was the only day of the year that anyone was allowed to enter the Holy of Holies.  In preparation he was to sprinkle fire from the altar with incense so that

“the smoke of the incense will conceal the atonement cover above the Testimony [ark] so that he will not die.” 

With sacrifice, through anointing with blood, the high priest was to make atonement even for the Most Holy Place, the Tent of Meeting, and the altar.  He was to sacrifice a goat for the sins of the people and he was to send another scapegoat “bearing their sins” live into the desert.

“The goat will carry on itself all their sins to a solitary place; and the man shall release  it in the desert.”[40]

Prior to the sacrifice of Yeshua on the cross, this laborious ceremony and solitary point of the year must have illustrated to Israel that only the most severe and directed purposes of Yahveh could free the people from their sin.

Just as it must have filled them with awe that year after year their representative, their mediator, their High Priest, could come successfully before Yahveh on their behalf, so it must have raised their anticipation that someday their Messiah would stand as final mediator before God and offer the full value of their ransom, becoming for them that potent sacrifice of which the yearling lamb was only a symbol.

This annual Yom Kippur ceremony is that which is described in resignation by the author of the book of Hebrews:

“But only the high priest entered the inner room, and that only once a year, and never  without blood, which he offered for himself and for the sins the people had committed in ignorance.”[41]

This Atonement ritual of blood and sacrifice came to an end.  The death of Yeshua on the cross caused the curtain over the entrance to the Holy of Holies to be “rent in two,” revealing that Yeshua himself had, by his sacrifice, covered us eternally with his blood and, as our eternal High Priest, had opened the way for all his children to stand blameless before God, to enter the Holy of Holies.  Meanwhile, for all who chose to reject the efficacy of the sacrifice of our Messiah, so for them also the Temple ceremony came to a close, as Rome crushed the Jewish rebellion in 70 A.D., and in the process destroyed the city of Jerusalem and the Temple.

Nevertheless, the honor of the appointed feast of Yom Kippur goes on in our time, especially marking for us that there is a time when sorrowing for our sins, as in the Days of Awe, must culminate in a response, an actual act of repentance, a true turning from sin.  On Yom Kippur we stand before God in dreadful awareness of the massive gesture by which he has entered our world to remove us from our sin, and in dreadful awareness of the total response to which we are called.

Until the coming of Yeshua our King and High Priest, Yom Kippur stood prophetically to point Israel toward the day of Messianic atonement.  Now, in this time, Yom Kippur still stands, always as the time of sober repentance, but also, we believe, as prophetic of things to come.  We will consider the possible significance of this when we review the seven feasts in terms of the actions of Yeshua on our behalf.  It is very possible that a coming Yom Teruah, Feast of Trumpets, will mark the beginning of the seven trumpets of Revelation, calling the world to repentance….leading to a final time of decision for all the world, after the manner of all who have stood before God in the yearly appointment of the Day of Atonement.




The Feast of Tabernacles

The Feast of Tabernacles is the climax of the cycle of seven holy “appointments.”  As the long journey of redemption began in the darkness of Egypt, so the High Holy Days begin in sober meditation in the month of Elul up until the 1st day of Tishri.  Then the sliver of the new moon and the call of the shofar mark Yom Teruah, the day of blowing.  And for ten days Israel places itself in the presence of God, until, on the Day of Atonement, we stand before Yahveh in consciousness that we stand before the Judge of the world.

Then, on the 15th, the full moon of Tishri, we are called to remember the goodness of God in the desert of Sinai as we lived in huts with manna to eat and water from the rock and the promise of eternity.  Equally we are called to recognize and give thanks for His goodness which brings us harvest at this time of year.  And we celebrate the faithfulness of God by which He brings us out of the furnace of history and joins us to himself for eternity.

The commandment of this feast through Moses is straightforward, a celebration in recognition of living in huts in the desert of the Exodus and a celebration of the harvest:

“’So beginning with the fifteenth day of the seventh month, after you have gathered the crops of the land, celebrate the festival to Yahveh for seven days; the first day is a day of rest, and the eighth day also is a day of rest.  On the first day you are to take choice fruit from the trees, and palm fronds, leafy branches and poplars, and rejoice before Yahveh your God for seven days. …This is to be a lasting ordinance for the generations to come; celebrate it in the seventh month.  Live in booths for seven days.  All native-born Israelites are to live in booths so your descendants will know that I had the Israelites live in booths when I brought them out of Egypt.  I am Yahveh your God.’”[42]

The analogous command of Yahveh in Deuteronomy emphasizes that this is to be a most joyful celebration for all who are joined within Israel: “Celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles for seven days after you have gathered the produce of your threshing floor and your winepress.  Be Joyful at your Feast – you, your sons  and daughters, your menservants and maidservants, and the Levites, the aliens, the    fatherless and the widows who live in your towns.”[43] 

The mention here of the deliberate inclusion of servants, widows, and aliens points toward the endtime significance of this feast.   In Exodus Yahveh refers to this feast as the Feast of Ingathering.   Therein lie the overtones which mark this feast as predictive of the great Ingathering of the children of God from all nations, and the celebration which will follow the final Day of Judgment:  the Marriage Supper of the Lamb.

Today people fabricate little huts in their back yards or even in their living rooms.  In this time, sleeping and eating [camping out] in a little hut is probably no less awkward than it was in the days of the return from exile when Ezra restored the people to the knowledge of God’s will:

“They found written in the Law, which Yahveh had commanded through Moses, that the    Israelites were to live in booths during the feast of the seventh month and that they should proclaim this word and spread it throughout their towns and in Jerusalem: ‘Go out into the hill country and bring back branches from olive and wild olive trees, and from myrtles, palms and shade trees, to make booths’ – as it is written.  So the people went  out and brought back branches and built themselves booths on their own roofs, in their  courtyards, in the courts of the house of God and in the square by the Water Gate and the one by the Gate of Ephraim.  The whole company that had returned from exile built booths and lived in them.  From the days of Joshua son of Nun until that day, the Israelites had not celebrated it like this.  And their joy was very great….”[44]

Undoubtedly the awkwardness only amplifies their joy, living in the knowledge that as they recline in the shade of a small hut their God has actually bent heaven and earth and all of history to the favor of the people whom He gathers to Himself.  I pray that many people in this time will rediscover that they are true children of the Messiah of Israel, that they are themselves the Israel of God.  As they face forward into the darkness of the coming days of persecution, may they take comfort also in the celebration, however awkward, of these wonderful feasts given to us by the appointment of our God in order to direct us to the glory and riches of our kingdom and of all that awaits us.


Part III.  The Feasts of Israel and the Messiah of Israel


“Every reader of the New Testament knows how frequent are such allusions to the Exodus, the Paschal Lamb, the Paschal Supper, and the feast of unleavened bread.  And that this meaning was intended from the first, not only in reference to the Passover, but to all the feasts, appears from the whole design of the Old Testament, and from the exact correspondence between the types and the antitypes.  Indeed, it is, so to speak, impressed upon the Old Testament by a law of internal necessity.  For when God bound up the future of all nations in the history of Abraham and his seed [Genesis 12.3], He made that history prophetic; and each event, and every rite became, as it were, a bud, destined to open in blossom and ripen into fruit on that tree under the shadow of which all nations    were to be gathered.”

Alfred Edersheim, The Temple, pp. 141,142



Yeshua in the great feasts

In the historical record, in the narrative of Scripture, we see the correspondence between the ancient feasts and the progress of Messianic activity in history.  It is, of course, much more than mere correspondence.  The world groans for restoration.  Rebellion has betrayed the purposes of creation.  A remnant has lived in groaning desire for the victory of their only king, victory to be accomplished by the hand of Emmanuel, the seed of the woman, the Messiah of Israel.

We are all stained by the revolt of our ancestors against God.  Our king, through much preparation, has opened the path for our redemption.  What remains is the dramatic confrontation which shall define the end of the era…the final warning, the final call to repentance, the judgment and harvest through which the faithful will be gathered to their king, and the forces of rebellion swept from the earth.

The passion of Yeshua in the week of his crucifixion was congruent with the pattern laid down in the covenant rituals of Passover and Firstfruits, while the feast of unleavened  bread has always been the leitmotif reminding us of the need for holiness.  The count of fifty days from the original Passover event leads to the day of Pentecost when the  law was given at Mount Sinai, while our king, a millennium and a half later, cautioned his disciples to wait an equal period until on that very same fiftieth day came the revelation of the Holy Spirit by whom we come to know the law within the heart.

Now, at this time in prophetic history, we are in transit between that fulfillment of the Feast of Pentecost and the coming fulfillment of the three great feasts of the seventh month.  In the yearly celebration of the Feast of Trumpets, the Day of Atonement, and the Feast of Tabernacles we await the resonance of their fulfillment.  By the elements of each feast our God attempts to educate our anticipation of that coming time.  In the sobering hours of Yom Teruah we are able to foresee an ultimate call to repentance for all the world, and, as we shall see, we are also given reason to look back at the glory of that day on which our Messiah was born of a woman.  In the Day of Atonement, Yom Kippur, we are called to live with our hearts open to the scrutiny and care of our mediator and high priest.  In Sukkot, the Feast of Tabernacles, we are encouraged to remember not only the past but also the great Abrahamic promise and the coming ingathering of the children of God from all nations.  In these feasts we are able to celebrate the full expanse of sacred history, without need to embellish our faith with borrowed pagan rituals.




Yeshua in Passover, Unleavened Bread, and Firstfruits

The triumphal exodus of Israel from Egypt circa 1446 B.C. was made possible only by the triumphal entry of Yeshua our Messiah into Jerusalem circa 30 A.D., as the lambs slain on the eve of Passover in Egypt were without meaning apart from their portent of the great sacrifice to come in the city of Jerusalem.  On the 10th of Nisan lambs were chosen for the sacrifice yet to come in the waning hours of the 14th  of Nisan, lambs to be held apart in the home, so that the lamb whose blood was shed would have a face and a character familiar to those who sacrificed him, the lamb also to be scrutinized for final assurance that it was without blemish.  On the 10th of Nisan Yeshua came to the home of his closest friends, Lazarus, Mary, and Martha, and ate with them and their guests.  During the following three days he spent evenings with friends and disciples, while each day he spent in the courts of the Temple, opening his heart to the people, to the priests and Pharisees and Sadducees, with these words in his heart:

“If only you [Jerusalem], even you, had only known …what would bring you peace – but   now it is hidden from your eyes.”[45]

Meanwhile the priests and Sadducees and Pharisees questioned and tested Yeshua with questions and riddles, hoping to find fault with him, but in response to the perfection of  his answers they could say nothing.

He was given a mock trial and sent to the cross, but this was a moment crafted in the earliest stirrings of Creation.  The victory of the Passover in Egypt was not founded on a tragedy in Jerusalem.  It was founded on the great victory of our king at the cross:

“The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified.”[46]

“Jesus…looked toward heaven and prayed: ‘Father, the time has come.  Glorify your   Son, that your Son may glorify you.”[47]

“Now is the Son of Man glorified and God is glorified in him.”[48]

Yes, on the cross he was “lifted up,” and the cross was his glory.  Upon the cross he spoke the words, “It is finished,”  the completion of that work which he came to earth to perform.  All the treasure of our destiny, the restoration of hope, was secured in those hours of his sacrifice.

“Here at the cross is the man who loves his enemies, the man whose righteousness is  greater than that of the Pharisees, who being rich became poor, who gives his robe to  those who took his cloak, who prays for those who despitefully use him.  The cross is not  a detour or a hurdle on the way to the kingdom, nor is it even the way to the kingdom; it is the kingdom come.”[49]         

A careful harmonization of all the gospel accounts reveals that on 14 Nisan, in the waning hours of the afternoon, as the men of Jerusalem were seeing to the slaughter of their lambs at the Temple, Yeshua was being nailed to the cross at a place called Golgotha, “the place of the skull.”  A day earlier, on the 13th, his disciples had already set about preparations for the coming Passover, and as the sun set, then in the first evening hours of the 14th they joined in a Preparation Day meal.[50]  In that night of the 14th Judas went about his business “to do quickly that which he was to do.”   Yeshua and the eleven left for the Kidron Valley and the Garden.  Yeshua was seized in the night and taken to Caiaphas and Ananias and to Pilate.  By morning there was a decision to put Yeshua to death.  In the brightening of the day he was beaten.  By afternoon he was carrying his cross to Golgotha.  He was, as John tells us, sacrificed that afternoon, on Preparation Day, the 14th of Nisan.[51]  And as it was the Day of Preparation, they hastened to place him in the tomb before nightfall and the beginning of the high Sabbath of Passover.[52]

As Yeshua went to the grave for our sins so all Israel at that moment undertook, in conjunction with Passover, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, in recognition of their profound need to be free of sin, though few recognized that victory over sin was at that moment being achieved within walking distance of their homes.  They saw that the afternoon skies were filled with darkness, but they did not hear the sound of the curtain in the temple being torn in half.

The next day, “the one after Preparation Day” [Passover, in the morning of the 15th , when Israel would have been setting out from Egypt] “the chief priests and the Pharisees went to Pilate” to make sure that the tomb was securely sealed.[53] The following day, the 16th, was the regular weekly Sabbath, the first Sabbath after the high Sabbath of Passover.  The day after that, the 17th, was the first day of the week, the day appointed as the Feast of Firstfruits, and the day on which Yeshua rose from the dead, fulfilling the  prophesy that he would remain in the tomb three days and three nights.

“After the Sabbaths [plural], at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and    the other Mary went to look at the tomb.  There was a violent earthquake, for an angel of    the Lord came down from heaven and going to the tomb rolled back the stone.”[54]

So even his resurrection was in accord with the appointment honored by Israel over a span of  nearly fifteen hundred years, the Feast of Firstfruits.  And Yeshua rose from the dead, firstborn among us his brothers, first in all things, first in the great harvest of God:

“For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive.  But each in his own turn:    Christ the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him,[55]




Yeshua in the Feast of Weeks  

For seven weeks Israel made its journey from Egypt to Sinai, to its appointed appearance before God.  Yahveh had told Moses that the day would come when he and all of Israel would worship Him at this mountain:

And God said, “I will be with you.  And this will be the sign to you that it is I who have  sent you: When you have brought the people out of Egypt, you will worship God on this mountain.”[56]

It was not the purpose of Yahveh merely to bring an end to physical servitude and relocate his people.  It was his purpose to bind them by covenant as his own.   There are many arguments pro and con as to whether it took exactly 50 days to get to the moment of receiving the covenant at Mt. Sinai.  I believe there is a strong argument in favor of the exact timing.  More important, however, is that Israel, Messianic or not, has consistently held that the day of the giving of the Torah was Shavuot, Pentecost, the 50th day.  And we know that on this same 50th day following the Passover sacrifice of Yeshua, the disciples, having been admonished by Yeshua to wait for the baptism of the Holy Spirit, were gathered together in one place and

“Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the    whole house where they were sitting.  They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that  separated and came to rest on each of them.  All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit  and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.”[57]

This was that to which John had pointed when he said,

I baptize you with water but he shall baptize you with the Holy Spirit.”[58]

This was the fulfillment of a core prophecy of Jeremiah and Ezekiel, that the day would come when the law, first given in the covenant at Sinai, seemingly on the day of Pentecost, would someday be placed in the heart of all who belong to Yahveh:

“The time is coming,” declares Yahveh, “when I will make a new covenant with the     house of Israel and with the house of Judah…I will put my law in their minds and write it  on their hearts.  I will be their God and they will be my people.”[59]

“I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your     heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh.  And I will put my Spirit in you and move   you to follow my decrees and be careful to keep my laws.”[60]





Yeshua in the Feast of Trumpets, Yom Teruah

For Yom Teruah the instructions of Yahveh to Moses seem slight, as if it were the most inconsequential of Feasts:

Yahveh said to Moses, “Say to the Israelites: ‘On the first day of the seventh month you    are to have a day of rest, a sacred assembly commemorated with trumpet blasts.  Do no regular work, but present an offering made to Yahveh by fire.’”[61]

Tishri 1, Yom Teruah, is the first of the High Holy Days of the seventh month, but, other than that, it is listed among the other feasts with little elaboration.  As it happens, however, its lack of specified purpose portends the rich usage of this day in the designs of God.

The surface of the feast is significant.  It is a new moon feast, a day of new beginnings.  It is also “a day of blowing,” when the shofar is to be sounded, the haunting call which evokes everything from extreme elation to the call to battle to the call to repentance.  As a call to reflection and repentance it exercises its function as point of commencement leading to the Day of Atonement on the 10th of Tishri.

The history of Yom Teruah is significant.  It is of course the inception of the civil New Year, such that in our time its primary celebration is as Rosh Hashanah, New Year’s Day.  However, as we mentioned earlier, the roots of this civil New Year run deep – all the way back to the beginning of the first year of human life on earth, day six of Creation, the day when God created Adam and Eve.  This day in fall is considered to be the first day of human life on earth, therefore the date of the birthday of Adam and the date of the beginning of the rule of God among men.  As anniversary date of the kingdom of Yahveh in the world it is also the date from which the kings of Israel have dated their years of rule as stewards of God over the people of God.

But there is more.  Shepherds and flocks do not abide in fields in the land of promise in the middle of winter.  Even Caesar Augustus would not order a census in the middle of winter.  Since the census, for many, involved migration to the place of birth, it would have been more reasonable in an agrarian society to order it in the fall at the end of the harvest.   In Luke’s account of the birth of John the Baptist and of the birth of Yeshua there are clues to the reasonable season of the birth of Yeshua, and these clues witness to 1 Tishri as that time.

Allow, for the sake of argument, that Yeshua should be born on 1 Tishri, the 1st day of the civil calendar.  As for the year of his birth, we reason as follows.  John began preaching along the Jordan “in the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar.”[62]   Yeshua came to John and then began his ministry soon afterward, at the age of “about thirty years.”[63]  [Apparently Luke never ventured to ask him his precise age.]  Precision of “the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar” seems impossible, but the arguments tend to favor the spread of years between 26 and 28 A.D.  Since we are already working with approximations, we might begin by trying the year 27 A.D.  Then the birth of Yeshua would have been 30 years previous, in about 3 B.C.

Now we propose that the birth of Yeshua is on the 1st day of the Hebrew month Tishri in the Gregorian year 3 B.C., or by the Hebrew calendar, Tishri 1, 3759 A.M.[64]   Thus the full date on the Gregorian calendar would have been September 11, 3 B.C.!  By the Hebrew civil calendar it was also Rosh Hashanah, New Year’s Day.

If you imagine or draw two horizontal bars representing the two years prior to the birth of Yeshua, and their monthly divisions, everything is easier to visualize.  [The year 3758 has twelve months and the year 3757 has 13 months, being an adjusted year.]  Counting back 9 months from 1 Tishri, 3759 A.M., places us in the beginning of the 4th month of 3758 A.M., 1 Tevet.  The first day of the fourth month of 3758 is then the date of the conception of Yeshua.

year 3757 A.M.       Aug. 31, 5 B.C. through Sep. 19, 4 B.C.

TIS – HES  – KIS – TEV – SHE – ADA – AD2 -//- NIS – IYA – SIV – TAM – AV  –  ELU

1          2       3       4        5        6A     6B         7        8       9      10      11     12


year 3758 A.M.       Sep. 20, 4 B.C. through Sep. 8, 3.B.C.

TIS – HES – KIS – TEV –  SHE – ADA – // –  NIS –   IYA –  SIV –   TAM  –   AV –   ELU

1          2       3        4       5         6             7          8        9        10        11        12


year 3759 A.M.         begin September 9, 3 B.C.

TISHRI 1 – Yom Teruah, birth of Yeshua. also Rosh Hashanah

We know from Luke that the pregnancy of Elizabeth with John the Baptist was six months in advance of Mary’s pregnancy with Yeshua.

“In the sixth month [of Elizabeth’s pregnancy], God sent the angel Gabriel to Nazareth, a town in Galilee, to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a  descendant of David.   The virgin’s name was Mary.”[65]

Gabriel announced to her that the Most High would overshadow her and cause her to bear a child who would  be called the Son of God.  And he advised her of the condition of her relative, Elizabeth:

“Even Elizabeth is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be       barren  is in her sixth month.”[66]

So we can go to our calendar and go back six more months to tentatively locate the conception of John the Baptist.  We traverse the beginning three months of 3758 and the last three months of 3757, placing us at the beginning of the 10th month or 1 Tammuz, in the year 3757 A.M.  Tammuz 1 is the beginning of the 10th month in the civil year, but just four months away from the beginning of the sacred year on 1 Nisan, 3757.

Conveniently, we are able to locate events surrounding the birth of John the Baptist because the annunciation of his birth to his father Zechariah occurred at a very specific time in the sacred calendar.  Zechariah was a priest belonging to the “course” of Abijah.  Under King David the priesthood had been divided into 24 courses or turns, with a fixed [double] rotation through the year, plus the obligation of all courses to be present in the Temple for the three main festival weeks: Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles.

We know that Zechariah belonged to the course of Abijah[67] and that Abijah held the 8th turn or course.[68]  The rotation was counted from the first Sabbath of the sacred year in Nisan.  As it happens, before the priests of Abijah could have their first regular turn they would have already been in Jerusalem twice for feast weeks, once for the week of Passover and once for the week of Pentecost.  So their first regular turn came in the 10th week of the sacred year.  Counting from the beginning of the sacred year, we come to the middle of the 3rd  month, Sivan, just two weeks prior to the proposed conception of John at the beginning of the 4th month.

Zechariah, serving in the Temple in that 10th week, was standing alone at the altar of incense when Gabriel appeared to him and told him that his wife Elizabeth would bear to him a son to be named John, who would

“go on before the Lord in the spirit and power of Elijah… to make ready a people   prepared for the Lord.”[69]

Then we are told,

“When his time of service was completed he returned home.  After this his wife        Elizabeth became pregnant and for five months remained in seclusion.”[70]

We now have a space of two weeks, the last half of Sivan, in which John could have been conceived.  By this count, going forward nine months, John would have been born on approximately 1 Nisan, the New Year, the new moon, two weeks before Passover.  Allowing for the two week margin, he might also have been born on Passover, on the 15th of Nisan.   There is, of course, a long tradition of expectation that “Elijah”, the one who announces the Messiah, should appear at Passover, for which Elijah’s cup is set out at the Passover feast.

Now, going forward again the six month difference between the two births, from the first weeks of Nisan 3758 we come to the time of the birth of Yeshua between 1 Tishri and 15 Tishri at the beginning of 3759 A.M.  There are interesting Scriptural suggestions tending to favor his birth on both dates.[71]  However, there is another argument which favors 1 Tishri, an argument based on astronomy and the book of Revelation.

Revelation, chapter12, describes the birth of Yeshua and connects his birth to a portent in the heavens:

“And a great portent was seen in heaven, a woman clad in the sun – with the moon under her feet, and a tiara of twelve stars on her head; she was with child, crying in the pangs of travail, in anguish for her delivery… She gave birth to a son, a male child, who is to  shepherd all the nations with an iron flail.”[72]

We circuit the sun in one year, and the backdrop of the zodiac, against which we [if we rise early] see the rising of the sun, is divided into 12 sectors, each inhabited by the figure of a constellation.  One of these constellations is the figure of Virgo, “the woman with a tiara of stars/constellations over her head.”

During a twelfth of the year, in fall, the sun rises in Virgo, during which time she is said to be “clothed in the sun.”  As the sun takes a year to move through the twelve sectors of the zodiac, the moon, orbiting also in nearly the same [ecliptic] plane, makes a full journey by leaps and bounds through the zodiac in 29.5 days.

Only at a very specific time would one be able to see both the sun rising in Virgo [roughly September] and also the moon rising under the feet of Virgo.  In the zodiac, solar position describes months and lunar position defines days.  According to NASA computations and the research of many others, this conjunction could only have happened on one day in the vicinity of 4 B.C. to 3 B.C.: that is on September 11, 3 B.C. or the new moon of 1 Tishri in 3759 Anno Mundi.  At that time the stars within Virgo would have been on the eastern horizon in the night sky, with the sliver of the new moon under her feet, the stars then fading into dawn as the sun rose in that same position of the horizon, “clothing her in the sun.”

This moment, according to Revelation, defines the moment of the birth of Yeshua.  This approximate moment is strongly suggested by the chronology surrounding the birth of John the Baptist.  The birth of our Messiah on 1 Tishri would have been the new moon of Yom Teruah, the day of blowing the shofar, the first of the High Holy Days of the year 3759 A.M.  He would so come into the world on the birthday of Creation.  He, the second Adam, coming into his world on the anniversary of the birth of the first Adam.

There is one final aspect of Yom Teruah which we must consider.  That is to ask what will be the eventual realization of this feast in the unfolding fabric of history.  What does it portend for the future?  What does it tell us about the coming return of our king?

My own suspicion is that the Feast of Yom Teruah, the day of blowing the shofar, will soon find its reality in history as the seven trumpets of Revelation.  As the shofar on 1 Tishri is meant to call us to repentance in preparation for standing before our God on the Day of Atonement, so the seven trumpets of Revelation are Yahveh’s final call to the people of all the earth to come before him in repentance, to turn from their rebellion and to devote their hearts to their God, all in preparation for a coming day of judgment.

That final call, sounded on the seven trumpets of Revelation,[73] is a series of warnings even more grave than the warnings given in Egypt leading up to the Exodus: hail and fire mixed with blood, a mountain on fire hurled into the sea, a star name Wormwood disturbing our sources of fresh water, the darkening of sun and moon, a plague of demonic locusts from the abyss attacking mankind, the attack of a great cavalry of cross-species beings, and a final curse of seven bowls of wrath laying waste the earth… as the armies of the nations surround Jerusalem and make war upon each other.  With each trumpet there will be the opportunity to turn to our Creator, but those who persevere in rebellion will ultimately be called before God, along with everyone else, to declare the virtue of their purposes and their actions.  Every soul who ever lived will stand and  make his case before God.





Yeshua in the Day of Atonement

Out of Yom Teruah and the Days of Awe comes the Day of Atonement.  Out of the time of the seven trumpets comes an end to all speculation about our place in the heart of God.  All that we have hoped for begins to happen.

“In the days of the seventh [last] angel’s [shofar] voice, …then shall the secret purpose of God be fulfilled, as he assured his servants the prophets.[74]

We are told the secret purpose of God in the book of Ephesians:

“And he made known to us the mystery of his will according to his good pleasure, which   he purposed in Christ, to be put into effect when the times will have reached their fulfillment – to bring all things in heaven and on earth together under one head, even Christ.[75]

Such is the ultimate atonement, redemption and union with our God.

“Then the seventh angel blew; and loud voices followed in heaven, crying, ‘The rule of  the world has passed to our Lord and his Christ, and he shall reign for ever and ever.’   Then the four and twenty Presbyters who are seated on their thrones before God, fell on  their faces and worshipped God, saying, ‘We thank thee, Lord God almighty, who art    and wast that thou hast assumed thy great power and begun to reign; the nations were  enraged, but thy wrath has come, the time has come for the dead to be judged, the time    for rewarding thy servants the prophets and the saints who reverence thy name, both low and high, the time for destroying the destroyers of the earth.’”[76]

After Michael and Satan fought in heaven, Michael prevailed, curiously “through the blood of the Lamb” and the witness of the saints.  As a result there was “no more place” for Satan and his angels in heaven.  It will be the same on earth.   Once the partisans of rebellion have staged their battles against our king, once they have fully demonstrated the emptiness of their purposes, there will no longer be a place for them in this world.

The City of God will then truly become the home of those who have given their hearts to their king.  Out of the time of the seventh trumpet will have come a time of confusion and battle, but out of it all will come the faithfulness of those who know their God, and God’s harvest of those who have remained faithful.


Yeshua in the Feast of Tabernacles

Ostensibly a feast to celebrate having lived in huts in the Sinai Desert, Yahveh himself also calls Tabernacles the Feast of Ingathering.  This is the season of the year for the harvest to be brought in and the goodness of God to be celebrated.  This portends also the time in history when our God will gather in his people from all the earth.  This is the festival above all others in which it is emphasized that all nations shall participate.

This is the Marriage Supper of the Lamb, toward which all hope advances, our celebration at table with Abraham and Moses and Yeshua our king.  In the Jewish wedding of ancient tradition, the consummation of the marriage was followed by a week of celebration, the marriage feast.  We are the bride of Yeshua our Messiah, and the consummation of our marriage will be celebrated.  The week of Sukkot looks forward to that day.  John describes in Revelation the coming of that day:

Then I heard a cry like the shout of a great host and the sound of may waves and the  roar of heavy thunder – “Hallelujah! Now the Lord our God almighty reigns!  Let us       rejoice and triumph, let us give him the glory!  For now comes the marriage of the Lamb. His bride has arrayed herself.  Yea, she is allowed to put on fine linen, dazzling white.”   The white linen is the righteous conduct of the saints.  Then I was told, “Write this:    ‘Blessed are those who have been called to the marriage-banquet of the Lamb!’”[77]

Zechariah describes the importance the Feast of Tabernacles will have in the millennium following the return of our king:

Then the Lord my God will come, and all the holy ones with him….The Lord will be         king over the whole earth.  On that day there will be one Lord and his name the only    name….Then the survivors from all the nations that have attacked Jerusalem will go up year after year to worship the King, the Lord Almighty, and to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles.[78]

Sukkot will become the great enduring victory festival for all the earth.





In conclusion, How, after so much time, do we presume to meddle with the celebration of Christmas, or presume to adopt the unfamiliar practices of the seven feasts of Israel?  It would be misguided to expect the synagogue to welcome us with open arms. It is unlikely that they would show great interest in teaching us their ways.  For them, most of us will be outsiders.

But, of course, that is not the point.  It does not matter what men think of us.  Paul addressed this situation so clearly:

A man is not a Jew if he is only one outwardly, nor is circumcision merely outward and  physical.  No, a man is a Jew if he is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of  the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code.  Such a man’s praise is not from men,  but from God.[79]

Furthermore we are not interested in breaking into the ossified habits of a Judaism which spurns the idea of personal salvation and counts on the collective destiny of genetic Israel.

If we choose to adhere to the appointments of our king, it is between us and our king.  We may never know anything but the most awkward relationship to the synagogue.  But our love for the God of history can shine even more clearly through the clumsiness of our heartfelt festival arrangements.  The temple and the synagogue were essential components of the old covenant tradition.  But in our time, He is our tabernacle and we are His.  We live each moment in the presence of our king, and nothing can deprive us of the richness of these festivals undertaken in intimacy with our king.

Let the question persist!  Hasn’t God found Christian culture to be an adequate culture within which to call men to himself?  I don’t know how to answer that question.  I believe the vast majority of Christian culture does not lead us to God; tragically, for most, this culture is something we have to overcome.  For me, Christian culture has been both a foundation and an obstacle.  The church does not lead men to Yeshua because the church does not know or seek Yeshua.  They entertain themselves with scripts of morality and formulas for salvation, while not at all seeking the Spirit and presence of God.   Exactly as in the time of his first coming, there is hardly a faction of the church which will confess that Yeshua is at this moment seated on the throne of David, the eternal heavenly throne, ruling victoriously over his people through the power and presence of his Spirit.

No. The traditions of Christian institutions are not enough.  Furthermore, a change is taking place.  We are on the threshold of the return of our king.  He is not returning in order to silently ignore the feasts which we ignore.  As we see, the Feast of Tabernacles will be the centerpiece of worldwide celebration.  Nor will he graciously abandon the seventh day Sabbath to honor the day chosen by Rome.  He is not returning merely as our personal savior.  He is returning as Lord of lords and King of kings; he is returning as King over his people Israel, to rule victoriously from Jerusalem.  For this reason he is calling out to his people to see him with greater precision, with increasing historical accuracy.

When Yeshua comes, what will glorify him will be warriors who serve him as faithful subjects of the realm, not skeptics watching for him to prove to them the validity of his “candidacy.”

We are in the time of prophecy.  Zechariah describes this time, this time of change, a time of new cultural imperatives.  For us who have grown up in traditionally Christian environments such changes are awkward, to say the least.  But I believe that each of us is obliged to present ourselves prayerfully before God and seek his will on this issue of the appointed feasts, each in his unique environment, each in his unique mission for our king.

Again the word of the Lord Almighty came to me.  This is what the Lord Almighty says:  “The fasts of the fourth, fifth, seventh, and tenth months will become  joyful and glad occasions and happy festivals for Judah.  Therefore love truth and peace.”

This is what the Lord Almighty says: “Many peoples and the inhabitants of many cities   will yet come, and the inhabitants of one city will go to another and say, ‘Let us go at    once to entreat the Lord and seek the Lord Almighty.  I myself am going.’  And many    peoples and powerful nations will come to Jerusalem to seek the Lord Almighty and to   entreat him.

This is what the Lord Almighty says: “In those days ten men from all languages and      nations will take firm hold of one Jew by the hem of his robe and say, ‘Let us go with    you, because we have heard that God is with you.’[80]


© Copyright 2014

Lawrence S. Jones

Chicago, Illinois




[1] Isaiah 1.11,13,14,15

[2][2] The Catholic institution is quite open in bragging that its historic establishment of Sunday as the day of worship rather than the historic Sabbath is prime evidence that its own pronouncements “carry all the weight of Scripture and divine decree.”

[3] This core truth of the kingdom of God is little discussed and little recognized in the modern world, but it is the very truth which shall most vividly describe itself in the coming years.  I discuss this at great length in other essays.

[4] Acts 2.36

[5] Romans 9. 6,8

[6] Romans 2.28,29

[7] John 14.6

[8] Deuteronomy 5.10

[9] Comah, Haggai 2.7f

[10] Jeremiah 10.3,4

[11] Matthew 15.8,9

[12] Mark 7.9

[13] Isaiah 66.23

[14] Ezekiel, chapters 45,46

[15] Hosea 12.9

[16] Zechariah 14.16

[17] In the Hebrew calendar, days begin at sundown, therefore all regular Sabbaths and Festival Sabbaths begin at sundown on the day before it is listed in the calendar.

[18] Psalm 19.4-6

[19] Enoch 74.2

[20] Enoch 80.2

[21] Genesis 7.11,24; 8.3,4

[22] Galloway, William Brown, Egypt’s Record of Time to the Exodus of Israel: Critically Investigated, p. 155

[23] Genesis 15.13,14

[24] Exodus 12.40-42

[25] In Hebrew, “between the evenings”; see Edersheim, The Temple, p.142, “The lamb was to be killed on the eve of the 14th, or rather, as the phrase is, ‘between the two evenings’ [Exodus 12.6; Leviticus 23.5; Numbers 9:3,5].  According to the Samaritans, the Karaite Jews, and many modern interpreters, this means between sunset and complete darkness [or, say, between six and seven p.m.]; but from the contemporary testimonies of Josephus, and from Talmudic authorities, there cannot be a doubt that, at the time of our Lord, it was regarded as the interval between the sun’s commencing to decline and his actual disappearance.  This allows for sufficient period for the numerous lambs which had to be killed, and agrees with the traditional account that on the eve of the Passover the daily evening sacrifice was offered an hour, or if it fell on a Friday, two hours, before the usual time.”

[26] days begin at sundown

[27] exodus 6.6,7,8

[28] Exodus 12.15

[29] Leviticus 23.9-11

[30] Leviticus 23.15-17,21

[31] Exodus 24.7,8

[32] Exodus 24.9-11

[33] Leviticus 23.23-25

[34] Amos 3.6

[35], Teshuvah and Creation, John J. Parsons

[36] Psalm 49.7,8

[37] Revelation 2.7,10,11; 3.5

[38] Leviticus 16.34

[39] Leviticus 16.29-31

[40] Leviticus 16.22

[41] Hebrews 9.7

[42] Leviticus 23.39-43

[43] Deuteronomy 16.13,14

[44] Nehemiah 8.14-17

[45] Luke 20.42

[46] John 12.23

[47] John 17.1

[48] John 13.31

[49] John Howard Yoder, The Politics of Jesus, p. 51

[50] John 13.2

[51] John 19.14,31

[52] John 19.42

[53] Matthew 27.62

[54] Matthew 28.1

[55] I Corinthians 15.22,23

[56] Exodus 3.12

[57] Acts 2.2-4

[58] Mark 1.8

[59] Jeremiah 31.31,33

[60] Ezekiel 36.26,27

[61] Leviticus 23.23-25

[62] Luke 3.1-3

[63] Luke 3.21-23

[64] Anno Mundi, dated from  Creation –however under the influence of the “Babylonian adjusted calendar”.

[65] Luke 1.26,27

[66] Luke 1.36

[67] Luke 1.5

[68] I Chronicles 24.10

[69] Luke 1.17

[70] Luke 1.23,24

[71] See Luke 2.10; Zechariah 14.16-19

[72] Revelation 12.1,2,5

[73] Revelation 8.1 through 11.18

[74] Revelation 10.7

[75] Ephesians 1.9,10

[76] Revelation 11.15-18

[77] Revelation 19.6-9

[78] Zechariah 14.5,9,16

[79] Romans 2.28,29

[80] Zechariah 8.18-23

Faithful in Battle


, , , , , , , , , , , ,

****    ****    ****

“The primary primitive Christian confession was not of Jesus as Savior but of Jesus as Lord.  ‘If you confess with your lips that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” [Rom. 10.9].  This is more than a confession that Jesus is my Lord.  It is first a theological confession that I recognize that God has exalted Jesus to the status of Lord.  He is the Lord; he has been exalted to God’s right hand.  Therefore, I make him my Lord by bowing to his sovereignty….The same truth is clearly set forth in Peter’s Pentecost address which he concludes with the statement, ‘Let all the house of Israel therefore know assuredly that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.” [Acts 2.36].  Taken out of context, this verse might mean that Jesus became Lord and Christ at his exaltation.  However, Acts 3.18[1] makes it clear that it was as the Christ that Jesus endured his sufferings…Christ means ‘anointed one’ and refers to his role as the anointed Davidic King.  Lord is a religious word meaning absolute sovereign….In his session Jesus has been made Lord. He has also begun his reign as the Messianic Davidic King.  He has entered upon his reign as Lord and Christ.”[2]

                                                                    George Eldon Ladd 

****    ****    ****


 The death of neutrality

In spite of poverty, crime and illiteracy, in spite of the decay of education and the increase of war, many living in comfort and safety envision mankind evolving toward ever higher planes of consciousness until we attain a level called by some, “Christ consciousness,” where Christ is not so much person as principal.  It is expected that participation in this principle will reveal us to ourselves as gods.  Such is the dream of Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin and his “ascent” of man to what he calls the “Omega Point.”  Such also is the dream of the Transhumanists, although they are wise enough to have lost patience with evolution and are banking on the more hasty processes of bioengineering and nanotechnology to craft their perfection.

But the path of a man to the Christ of history is not a scramble up the stairway of consciousness.  It is rather the collision of the consciousness of the human person with the being and consciousness of the divine person, Yeshua of Nazareth.  He is the one who has informed us that he himself is the origin of God’s creation, the Logos, in whom all things find their beginning. Yeshua, having lived and died as a man, is now resurrected and seated in full authority over all of history, seated at the right hand of the God of all worlds.  Seated also, by his Spirit, in the hearts of his subjects.

Late in the first century A.D. Yeshua, from the throne of heaven, revealed to his disciple, John, prophetic messages pertaining to the end of this era.  What these messages foresaw was not an Omega Point but rather a Point of Frenzy in which mankind will no longer have the luxury of neutrality and will be forcefully divided into two groups – those who enlist in the agenda of the world mind and those who refuse and stand on their own.

Globalism, ecumenism, and war are spreading at such a pace that we who reject the reach of the world mind must take extra care to encourage each other to prepare our hearts, to be fully awake, and to be ready at all times to stand in the truth.  Those of us who merely acknowledge God will not survive.  We must be bound to our God.  We must own life as sacrifice, life given to God as Yeshua swore himself on our behalf and gave his life for us.  We must be bound in the knowledge that our hope lies with Him alone:

Be faithful though you have to die for it, and I will give you the crown of life.”

                                                                   Revelation 2.10


 Compromise and dissent: the “Christian Empire” dilemma

Under the Roman emperor Diocletian there was a grim manhunt and a long persecution of all who refused to acknowledge the emperor’s claim to absolute authority over the lives of his subjects – persecution of those who, in the face of his royal prerogative, yet dared to brand themselves with the seditious claim, “Yeshua is my royal lord and sovereign king.”  They further brought offense by claiming loyalty to certain sacred Scriptures as having authority above all other writings and traditions.

Thousands of followers of Yeshua were killed, preferring to stand with their king, even in the loss of every earthly possession and enjoyment, even in the loss of life itself.  Many others, however, yielded to the demands of the emperor and were able to see their bodies spared.  Some even aided Diocletian in his persecutions by revealing the identities of fellow worshippers and by rendering to the enemy copies of the contested Scriptures.  Such people were infamously known as traditores, “those who turn things in.”

Then, in a change of imperial rule, Rome was transformed.  Under the emperor Constantine, faith in Yeshua – carefully refurbished as faith in a more Gentile and global Jesus – became the very faith of the realm.  Constantine, wisest of politicians, saw something exceptional in the “Christian” traditores: that they understood the supreme importance of personal faith bending before imperial power.  Therefore Constantine saw to it that large numbers of the bishops of his new Roman church were chosen from the ranks of the traditores.  So began the long marriage, or at very least détente, between ecclesiastical power and temporal power.  So began the contempt of the Catholic church for the supremacy and intimacy of the relationship between a man and his God.

In response to this installation of traitors in positions of authority over the faithful, many believers rose in protest, setting themselves apart, asserting that it could not possibly be God’s will that they be shepherded by men with the character to betray the Scriptures and the lives of their brothers.  The new Roman theologians responded that, in any official capacity, the authority of an official of the church is not compromised by his personal idiosyncrasies or shortcomings.  Roman power then hunted down the dissenting purists and drove them either to their deaths or to the fringes of society.

So rose to currency the enduring adage: “Do not try to be holier than the church!”


The wayward maiden matures into the global harlot.

Today Rome maintains that ancient role, orchestrating the ambitions of her cardinals with the ambitions of kings.  Rome, over time, resembles that cleverly constructed doll, which, by a few convolutions of her garments, reveals the ability to enact all the characters of a story.  In one time she is a mighty ecclesiastical institution with far reaching but concealed tentacles of temporal power.  In another time she appears to be a small temporal kingdom, while under her royal robes spread invisible cords of ecclesiastical power.  Rome assumes many forms, and yet she remains Imperial Rome.

Today she plays the part of the ecclesiast in disarray, shepherded by a diminutive Pope in white cassock, her temporal power but a handful of Swiss guards inside the Vatican.  In reality, however, she owns the treasure of centuries; owns controlling interest in banks; maintains universities and costly scientific enterprises; holds endless real estate, monasteries, vineyards, and distilleries; fields an army of priests and Jesuits in the hundreds of thousands – while the kings and lords of nations rarely deny their kiss of obeisance upon the papal ring.  The leaders of the world dare not separate themselves from Rome and hope to retain power.

The Pope, meanwhile, positions himself to be the great ecumenical mediator of the religions of the world.   John Paul II gathered the bishops and gurus and shamans of all religions at Assisi and had each one place his peculiar deity upon the Catholic altar, each to receive honor and glory in the blasphemy of ecumenical “godliness.”  The Popes equally have plied their trade with Shimon Peres and the Zionists in order to consolidate Roman power in Jerusalem.

John Paul II even made peace with the evolutionists and raised to a place of honor the heretical Jesuit, Teilhard de Chardin.  In Fe e Futuro, Cardinal Ratzinger, in brazen language, belittled the thought of man created in the image of God, and asserted that the church must adjust to the modern scientific conclusion that man is an animal that has not “fallen” but rather has ascended from primeval darkness into the light.

This “church,” which conducts its life as the handmaiden of world political power, has totally betrayed the truth of Yeshua, who is the only sovereign over the holy people of God, without need of any Pope or Pontiff or Vicar of any kind.  The Catholic institution, since the day of Constantine, has cynically inserted itself between the believer and his God, so gathering to the Catholic edifice those powers which appropriately belong to God alone.

The true presence of God in man is conveyed by the substantial presence of the Spirit of God in the believer as enabled immediately by the love and agency of Yeshua himself, and is not conveyed by the ludicrous and cynical charade of priestly conjurings over a factory-made wafer.

The forgiveness of God is conveyed directly to the person who kneels before God and confesses his sins, while the claim of a priest to have the power to forgive sins is a lie matched only by their claim to have the power to conjure the very being of God into a wafer.  Nor is there anything respectable in priests who sit in dark closets and draw out the confession of the most intimate secrets and disappointments of wives and maidens.[3]

The claims of the Popes – these very men who openly deny the creation of man in the image of God – these claims that they are the representatives [vicars] of God on earth are nothing short of the blasphemous representations of the anti-Christ, lies born in the heart of Satan himself.  John Paul II even dared to call himself “the replacement of the second person of the Trinity on earth!”[4]

The teaching that the mortal woman, Mary, is Queen of Heaven, Mother of God, and co-Redeemer with Christ is nothing less than the revelation of the roots of the Catholic church in a Gnosticism which adores the goddess Sophia as the queen of heaven, demotes the God of creation to a mere demi-god, and, in the ultimate obscenity, raises to the metaphysical zenith that princely consort of Sophia, who is none other than Lucifer!  This is a Gnosticism which is nothing short of the worship of Lucifer, wherein lies the bond which shall unite the false religions of the world.

The worshippers within the churches of Rome are mostly kept in ignorance of the abominations which are actually being spread by the authors of these teachings.  The penitent enter these churches in the hope of reaching out to God, while priests and teachers lead them to kneel, not at the feet of a loving and merciful God, but at the feet of men in cassocks, teach them to kneel before the overriding and crushing power of the church institution, its priests, its sacraments, its Pope, its distorted gods and false goddess.

This is the church modeled after the Pharisaic religion of the time of Yeshua on earth:

“Woe to you experts in the law, because you have taken away the key of knowledge; you yourselves have not entered in; and them that were entering you have hindered.”                                                                Luke 11.52

This is the church which is positioning itself in the middle of world affairs, which is preparing itself to nod benevolently toward people of all faiths, encouraging all to be no holier than the church, to hold hands and adopt a new mantra, for the sake of a new age of peace and good will.


The new Roman Empire and the return of dissent

Where are the voices of dissent?  People attend mass, comfortable in the old liturgies, unaware that their leaders are selling them into a hell…not merely a betrayal of Scripture: the bishops and the Jesuits are working with the leaders of the Protestant churches and with the heads of nations to bring together a great new imperial society. Yes, in the words of the Popes, “It is time for a new age.”  In the words of the leaders of the United States and Europe, nationalism is no longer mentioned and all are occupied with talk of global cooperation in a New World Order.

The world religions and the national powers work together, every faction making sure that it will not be left out when the great union is achieved.  But that union will be a reinvention of the Rome of Constantine.  As such, it will be intolerable that the voices of divine authority should oppose or even seem to rise above the voices of civil power.  As in the days of Constantine, civil and ecclesiastical power must be seamlessly grafted together, and those with the temerity to occupy a ground more holy than that of the church shall be driven to the fringes of the world.

But we know from the revelation of Scripture that under the oppression of the world-mind, many shall rise as witnesses to the truth of Yeshua.  There shall be powerful voices of dissent.  There shall be those who stand in their faith and refuse to remain silent as the civil and religious powers compromise all that is noble in humanity.  For the living kingdom of Yeshua and the great hope of the Abrahamic promise, the hope of history, all belongs to us who are faithful to Yeshua.  Yeshua holds us to himself: We are bound together, and nothing, not even death, can separate us from him.

The stratification of society into those who adopt the world-mind and those who refuse it was portrayed two thousand years ago in the writings of John.  Confined to a prison cell off the coast of Greece, he received visions and recorded them in the book known as RevelationIn his visions we hear the voice of those who serve their king and honor a kingdom which can not be seen, which king and kingdom they serve at the price of their lives.

John sees the world-mind in the image of “the Beast,” who represents both the world kingdom and the world master who stands at the head of the edifice:

“Then as I stood on the sand of the sea, I saw a Beast rising out of the sea.  The Beast I saw resembled a leopard, his feet were like a bear’s, and his mouth like a lion’s [i.e. bearing qualities of the constituent empires from which it is formed.]

                                                                            Revelation 13.1,2

The vision indicates that the dragon, Lucifer, will be recognized and honored as the source of the glory of the great empire, and the Beast will be feared and honored for its indomitable military might:

“…To him the dragon gave his own power and his own throne and great authority…. and the whole earth went after the Beast in wonder, worshiping the dragon for having given authority to the Beast, and worshiping the Beast with the cry, ‘Who is like the Beast?  Who can fight with him?’”  Revelation 13.2-4

The Beast is much more than a broad-minded globalist hoping to bring order out of chaos.  He is the virulent opponent of the God of Israel.

“He was allowed to utter loud and blasphemous vaunts, and allowed to exert authority for two and forty months; so he opened his mouth for blasphemies against God… He was allowed to wage war on the saints and to conquer them, and also given authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation…”

                                                                           Revelation 13.5-7

And he will hold dominion over every person who does not take a stand with Yeshua:

“All dwellers on earth will be his worshippers, everyone whose name has not been written from the foundation of the world in the Book of Life.”

                                                                               Revelation 13.8

In John’s vision we also meet the “miracle worker,” the director of worship, the doctrinal leader who brings metaphysics into the service of the world ruler:

“Then I saw another Beast rising from the land; he had two horns like a lamb, but he spoke like a dragon.  He exerts the full authority of the first Beast in his presence, causing the earth and its inhabitants to worship the first Beast….He performs amazing miracles, even making fire descend from heaven on earth in the sight of men, and by dint of the miracles he is allowed to perform in presence of the Beast, he seduces dwellers on earth; he bids the dwellers on earth erect a statue to the Beast who lived after being wounded by the sword, and to this statue of the Beast he was allowed to impart the breath of life, so that the statue of the Beast should actually speak.”                                      Revelation 13.11-15

We find that he who holds the very manual of righteousness — this author of all catechisms, this master of mythologies – we find that he also holds the sword of judgment.  He is aided in the efficient exercise of judgment by a global system of classification:

“He has everyone put to death who will not worship the statue of the Beast, and he obliges all men, low and high, rich and poor, freemen and slaves alike, to have a mark put upon their right hand or their forehead, so that no one can buy or sell unless he bears the mark, that is, the name of the Beast, or the cipher of his name.”                                                                                                Revelation 13.15-17 

The key to remaining safe within this world-mind society is our willingness to publicly give honor and devotion to the Beast and his image and, by implication, to endorse his values and goals and accomplishments.  In return for this willingness to pledge allegiance to the Beast we will be able to wear upon our right hand or forehead his cipher, his imprimatur, indicating that we are not in any way dissenters or opponents of the global  power, that we are above any form of protest or civil disobedience, for opposition and every form of disorder or threat to the world-mind society must be driven out.

Revelation makes it clear that those who belong to Yeshua will not qualify for this mark, nor will they accept it.


The bond of the Covenant

By word of our king, we are “in the world but not of the world.”  Now, however, the trench deepens between the City of God and the City of the World.  Our easy passage through the world-mind landscape is coming to an end.  For the world-mind is coveting to itself all devotion, as insurance of its global supremacy. It used to be enough that we occupy the role of citizen, but soon we will be called to play the part of world-mind supplicant.  For those of us who kneel in fealty only before God, the role of world-mind supplicant is quite impossible.

Are we now ready for an act of civil disobedience which may cost us our lives?  What will sustain us and fill our hearts with a devotion which can stand against the seduction and the threats coming from the world around us?  What will keep us fixed on a loyalty and a hope so grand that the threat of death can not undo it?  What will hold us firm in devotion to the unique truth of Yeshua when everyone calls us to save our lives and simply acknowledge the integrity of diverse religious inspiration?

The consolidation of the world-mind society into a homogeneous global structure under a “world messiah” is the final assault of the forces of rebellion against the God of creation.  It is the final test of the people of God, and it will be our final witness to the magnificent truth of our God.

It will be a test of the depth of our loyalty and our love for the person of our God.  It will be a test of our trust in the power of his Spirit to hold us and sustain us.  It will be a test of the vision by which we are separated off from the greater body of mankind.  It will be the great proof of the emptiness of the City of the World, and it will reveal the unshakable foundations of the City of God.

There is a prophetic passage in Daniel which reveals the architecture of that to which we must hold, that within which Yeshua brings us his power and renders us able to stand against the seductions and threats of the world mind.  This passage in Daniel states plainly the focal point of all the assaults of the anti-messiah, and so it is a revelation of that which is “the king’s queen,” that prize, the possession of which makes battle the richest privilege, the loss of which renders battle meaningless.

The core objective of the enemy’s hatred is the covenant between God and his people  — in particular the critical elements upon which every prior covenant did depend and upon which the new covenant is fashioned: 1.]Yeshua’s covenantal sacrifice of his blood, by which we are bought back from death, 2.] our loyalty to our sovereign king as his holy people, our loyalty to his covenant expectations, and 3.] our preservation of the core hope of the covenant: the promises to Abraham.

Against this covenant, element by element, the enemy has been striving since the early centuries.  Satan directs his hatred against this covenant because it is the essential in-historical content of God’s love for his people.   Because of the content of the covenant, our life with Yeshua is not mere wishful meditation but is history, is past and present and future and human destiny.  All our access to our God and the power of God to hold us to himself is enshrined within this covenant.  If Satan can simply spoil all understanding of the covenant between Yeshua and his subjects, then all worship will be reduced to the insipid babble prescribed by the world-mind, a worshipful mumble which can offend no one because it no longer possesses meaningful content.

To conclude that “the covenant” is the most determinant structure of our bond to Yeshua may sound like mere theology, but we will see that this which is so hated by Satan lies at the core of redemption and history.  If we are to survive, we must refuse to take the covenant for granted.  We must hold tight to every aspect of its riches.  Satan knows our weakness when any part of this treasure is carried away, therefore he has been carefully at work within every sect of those who attach themselves to Yeshua, doing all in his power to tailor for them a “civilized” semblance of faith which owns no need to bother itself with the details of that covenant which our sovereign king fashioned for our sake.

The passage in Daniel reveals Satan’s hatred for the covenant and reveals much about those who stand within it.

“The king of the North will return to his own country with great wealth, but his heart will be set against the holy covenant.  He will take action against it and then return to his own country.  At the appointed time he will invade the South again, but this time the outcome will be different from what it was before. Ships of the western coastlands will oppose him, and he will lose heart. Then he will turn back and vent his fury against the holy covenant.  He will return and show favor to those who forsake the holy covenant.

“His armed forces will rise up to desecrate the temple fortress and will abolish the daily sacrifice. Then they will set up the abomination that causes desolation.  With flattery he will corrupt those who have violated the covenant, but the people who know their God will firmly resist him.

“Those who are wise will instruct many, though for a time they will fall by the sword or be burned or captured or plundered.  When they fall, they will receive a little help, and many who are not sincere will join them.  Some of the wise will stumble, so that they may be refined, purified and made spotless until the time of the end, for it will still come at the appointed time.

“The king will do as he pleases.  He will exalt and magnify himself above every god and will say unheard-of things against the God of gods.  He will be successful until the time of wrath is completed, for what has been determined must take place.”                                                                            Dan. 11.28-36

Many suppose that concern with a “covenant” must be an Old Testament issue, and so they surmise that the battle against the covenant and the “abomination of desolation” are essentially 4th c. B.C. prophecies fulfilled in the 2nd c. B.C.  It is true that in the rage of the king of the North against the covenant, he is credited with deeds which seem to belong to the past:

‘His armed forces will rise up to desecrate the temple fortress and will abolish the daily sacrifice.  Then they will set up the abomination that causes desolation…”

                                                                                        Daniel 11.31

We do know that in 169 B.C. Antiochus Epiphanes did plunder the temple in Jerusalem and by 168 B.C. set up an altar to Zeus Olympus inside the temple, totally desecrating it.  And there has been neither temple fortress nor daily sacrifice since the destruction of the temple in 70 A.D.

We could be content that this is just a short term prophecy which has no bearing on our time were it not for the subsequent context in Daniel and a remark made by Yeshua in the Olivet Discourse.

Daniel’s “king of the North” openly blasphemes Yahveh and publicly magnifies himself above Yahveh.  These are hallmarks of the final “man of lawlessness.”  And Daniel, in the passage quoted, ran his narrative of the king of the North right on to “the time of the end” and “the time of wrath,” which suggests that the battle against the covenant, including the “abomination” event, are related to the time of the end.

Yeshua affirms this as he alludes to this very passage in Daniel while talking with his disciples about the end of the era:

“So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel – let the reader understand – then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains…For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now – and never to be equaled again.”  Mat. 24.15,21

Daniel’s narrative also goes on to take that which seems to be buried in the past and connect it with the apocalyptic future as he narrates that “those who know their God” will resist the king of the North and instruct others in that faith; although some will struggle, it will serve the benefit of their understanding, and resistance will go on “until the time of the end.” 


The blood of the covenant

The Spirit of Yeshua is the indestructible cord of steel which binds us to our king, but the covenant is the structure which establishes the possibility of that bond and defines the nature of that bond.  Man and wife are bound by love, but the covenant of marriage sets the parameters of that relationship which finds its life in love.  A sovereign Lord and his subjects are bound by love and by devotion unto death, and the covenant is the oath of devotion which establishes the parameters of that commitment by virtue of which they give their lives to each other and to the welfare of their kingdom.  By such a covenantal oath we are bound to Yeshua our king.

The price and the power of this covenant are beyond measure, because at the center of it we come to the blood of Yeshua, shed at the cross and laid upon the horns of the heavenly altar.

“This cup  is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you.”

                                                                                           Luke 22.20

“Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered once for all into the holy place thus obtaining eternal redemption for us.”

                                                                                         Hebrews 9.12

This sacrifice stands alone in history, towering over all of history, to stem the flow of damage coming from Satan’s seduction of mankind.   It is the blood of the long awaited Passover lamb, that blood prayerfully anticipated in every ancient Paschal sacrifice, that blood now at the center of our thanksgiving in every modern Paschal feast.

The power of the blood of Yeshua is such that by it Satan was thrown from heaven to earth.  It is no surprise then that Satan “has his heart set” and “vents his fury” and is in total war against this covenant sealed with the blood of Yeshua our king.  The evident power of the blood of our king in casting Satan down from heaven is part of the witness of John in the narration of Revelation:

“And war broke out in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting with the dragon; the dragon and his angels also fought, but they failed, and there was no place for them in heaven any longer.  So the huge dragon was thrown down – that old serpent called the Devil and Satan, the seducer of the whole world – thrown down to earth, and his angels thrown down along with him.  Then I heard a loud voice in heaven saying, ‘Now has it come, the salvation and power, the reign of our God and the authority of his Christ! – for the Accuser of our brothers is thrown down, who accused them day and night before our God.  But they have conquered him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony; they had to die for it, but they did not cling to life.  Rejoice for this, O heavens and ye that dwell in them!  But woe to earth and sea!  The devil has descended to you in fierce anger, knowing that his time is short.’”              Rev. 12.7-11

Satan is struck down from heaven to earth, and we must be attentive to the fact that he is among us.  Meanwhile we rejoice that the throne of the heavens and the temple of heaven are free of him, so that no longer does God witness the droning of his accusations against us.  It is certainly in light of this very truth that Paul rejoices that now, under our covenant with Yeshua, No One can bring accusation against us for we are dressed in the colors of our king.  This passage is an exaltation of the sustaining and liberating power of the new covenant:

“Who will bring any charge against those whom God has chosen?  It is God who justifies.  Who is he that condemns?  Christ Jesus, who died – more than that, who was raised to life – is at the right hand of God and is also interceding for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?  Shall trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword?  As it is written:

            ‘For your sake we face death all day long; we are considered as sheep to be slaughtered.’     

“No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Messiah Jesus our Lord.”                                                                                                                            Romans 8.33-39


The emblem and purpose of the covenant

In Scripture, the covenant of Yahveh, from its origins until its final realization through the victory of Yeshua, wears an emblem, a mantra, the repetition of  these words of Yahveh:

“I will be your God, and you will be my people.”

These words are an expression of the purpose of the covenant: that union be established between God and his people.

Yahveh began with Abraham to bring into the world the kingdom which would become the restoration of the earth.  Yahveh said to Abraham:

“I will establish my covenant as an everlasting covenant between me and you and your descendants after you for the generations to come, to be your God and the God of your descendants after you.”                                                  Genesis 17.7

The above statement makes it clear that the covenant with Abraham is forever, and nothing can undo it.  But as the children of Abraham grow into a people set apart for God the covenant will become amplified.  Four hundred and thirty years after initiating the covenant with Abraham, Yahveh speaks with Moses, affirming that the promise to Abraham finds its fulfillment through Moses and the people of the exodus.  Again the appearance of the emblem:

“…and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm… I will take you as my own people and I will be your God ...And I will bring you to the land I swore with uplifted hand to give to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob.”                          Exodus 6.6,7,8

He speaks to Moses again, specifying that “my people” means to be a people apart, both by definition and by distinction of their devotion to the will of their God expressed in the terms of the covenant:

“Now if you obey me fully and keep my covenant, then out of all nations you will be my treasured possession.  Although the whole earth is mine, you will be a kingdom of priests for me and a holy nation.”                                       Exodus 19.5,6

It is clear in the above passage that “to keep the covenant” is to be obedient to the Lord of the covenant.  Through Jeremiah Yahveh delivered a warning against Israel’s abandonment of the covenant, their disobedience, their preference to follow their own will.  The dissolution of covenant loyalty became the collapse of Yahveh’s goal of union:

“I brought your forefathers out of Egypt…I gave them this command: Obey me [obey the commands of the covenant] and I will be your God and you will be my people.   Walk in all the ways I command you, that it may go well with you.  But they did not listen or pay attention; instead they followed the stubborn inclinations of their evil hearts.”                      Jeremiah 7.23,24

As a result of their disobedience Yahveh took down the fence of protection around his people and let them be carried off into exile in Babylon.  Then through Jeremiah came Yahveh’s promise to bring his people back from exile, to restore them to their covenant:

“My eyes will watch over them and I will bring them back to this land…. I will give them a heart to know me, that I am Yahveh.  They will be my people and I will be their God, for they will return to me with all their heart.” Jeremiah 24.6,7

But the evidence is ample that the return was intended to be much more than the physical return to Canaan at the end of seventy years of absence.  Yahveh spoke of return in broad and mystical terms.  The promise of “a heart to know me” is uniquely the promise of the new covenant.  Restoration to the covenant had become, in the purpose of Yahveh, restoration through a new covenant.  In this light it is not surprising to see Jeremiah prophesying that restoration to covenant union will come under the rule of the Messiah:

“Their leader will be one of their own; their ruler will arise from among them…. So you will be my people and I will be your God.”       Jeremiah 30.21,22

As prophesied through Jeremiah, the promise of the new covenant would increase the power of the people to fulfill the expectation of the earlier covenants and better attain God’s goal of union between Him and his people:

“The time is coming when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah …This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time, says the Lord.  I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts.  I will be their God and they will be my people.”                                                         Jeremiah 31.31,33,34

Then came a huge promise through Ezekiel that the new covenant would be under the Messiah, would bring peace between man and God and would make possible God’s habitation among us – i.e. would tear down the veil of the Holy of Holies, that his Spirit might now be in immediate relationship with us, defining us as intimate with our God and separate to our God:

“And David my servant [i.e. Yeshua, heir to the throne of David] will be their prince forever. I will make a covenant of peace with them; it will be an everlasting covenant. I will establish them and increase their numbers, and I will put my sanctuary among them forever.  My dwelling place will be with them; I will be their God and they will be my people.  Then the nations will know that I Yahveh make Israel holy, when my sanctuary is among them forever.”       Ezekiel 37.25,26,27,28

Ezekiel conveyed the promise that it would ultimately be the new covenant which would  bring about the covenant union desired by Yahveh, providing the possibility of the Spirit of God resting immediately in the hearts of his subjects:

“I will give them an undivided heart and put a new spirit in them  …then they will follow my decrees…They will be my people and I will be their God.”                                                                                                               Ezekiel 11.19,20

Six hundred years later Paul asserted that we who live inside the new covenant are a fulfillment of the covenant goal, subjects living in immediate relationship to our God, without need of mediating priest or sacrifice other than what Yeshua has accomplished for us:

“For we are the temple of God.  As God has said: “I will live with them and walk among them, and I will be their God and they will be my people.”   II Corinthians 6.16

Then, in the vision of Revelation, in the ultimate fulfillment, as God brings to earth the New Jerusalem “like a bride” for his covenant people:

“And I heard a voice out of the throne, crying, ‘Lo, God’s dwelling place is with men, with men will he dwell; they shall be his people, and God will himself be with them.’”                                                                             Revelation 21.3

“Then he who was seated on the throne said, ‘Lo, I make all things new….I will let the thirsty drink of the fountain of the water of life without price.  The conqueror shall obtain this, and I will be his God and he shall be my son.”                                                                            Revelation 11.5,6,7,8 excerpts


The parameters and the progression of the covenant

A covenant is a pact sovereignly administered between the covenant lord and his people.

Its purpose is to establish the conditions under which union of interest and purpose can be achieved.  Only the sovereign has the power to guarantee that the terms of the covenant will satisfy the goal of union. The covenant of a Sovereign and his people is not an exchange between equals. It is not a trade of loyalty in return for protection.

From a position of absolute power the sovereign calls for covenant loyalty from those who recognize his pre-existing right over them, from those who are ready to acknowledge and live within his royal claim.

Yahveh came to Abraham.  From the beginning Yahveh called him to separate himself from his family and his country and to set out for a land unknown.  Abraham recognized the voice of his Creator, his sovereign Lord, and he obeyed that voice.

Yahveh led Abraham to Canaan where he appeared before him and spoke with him:

“On that day Yahveh made a covenant with Abram and said,To your seed I will give this land, from the River of Egypt to the great river the Euphrates’.”                                                                                                       Genesis 15.18

That promise was sealed by a covenant ritual in which animals were slaughtered and divided in half, and “a smoking firepot with a blazing torch [representing the presence of God] passed between the pieces.”  So it was sealed with the enactment of a self-maledictory oath, an indication of the “to the death” nature of the promise.

By the witness of Paul[5] and of Yeshua himself[6] we know that Abraham understood that “to your seed” meant something more than his immediate offspring, that it pointed to the Messiah who would be born into his line and would bring the rule of peace to the earth.

So the covenant with Abraham was a call to whole-hearted loyalty and also a great promise which would encompass and fulfill all of human history, finding its meaning and culmination in the ultimate rule of Yeshua on earth.

“And when Abram was ninety nine years old, Yahveh appeared to

Abram, and said unto him: ‘I am God Almighty; walk before me, and be thou whole-hearted.  And I will make my covenant between me and you, and I will multiply you exceedingly.  And Abram fell on his face; and God talked with him, saying; ‘As for me, behold, my covenant is with you and you shall be the father of a multitude of nations.  Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham; for a father of a multitude of nations have I made you.  And I will make you exceedingly fruitful, and I will make nations from you, and kings shall come out of you.  And I will establish my covenant between me and you, and between me and your seed after you, throughout their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be unto you for a God, and to your seed after you.”                                                                             Genesis 17.1-7

Four centuries later, the descendants of Abraham, nearly a million in number, were led from Egypt by Moses acting in obedience to the call of Yahveh.  In the Sinai desert Yahveh gave his people an amplified covenant intended to establish them as a nation bound to Yahveh their king.

The Sinai covenant was not a replacement of the covenant with Abraham.  It was an expansion meant to amplify the capacity of the holy people to know the will of their God and be a people set apart to God.  As Paul wrote, nothing pre-empts the original promise to Abraham as the core of God’s relationship to his people:

“Just as no one can set aside or add to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is in this case.  The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed.  The Scripture does not say, “and to seeds,” meaning many people, but “and to your seed,” meaning one person, who is Christ.  What I mean is this: the Law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise.  For if the inheritance depends on the law, then it no longer depends on a promise; but God in his grace gave it to Abraham through a promise.”                                              Gal. 3.15-18

Paul is taking note that all covenant relationship is a function of God’s sovereign promise, God’s grace, the same grace extended to Abraham when it was noted that “Abraham believed Yahveh, and He credited it to him as righteousness.”[7]

Paul teaches furthermore that the Sinai covenant was meant and is meant to guide us to Yeshua.

“So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith.”                                                                                                         Galatians 3.24      

People like to make much of Paul’s statements suggesting that the old covenant is overturned by the new.  But it must be reckoned that the essence of the old covenant is not overturned: our king voices repeatedly, in the book of Revelation, his expectation that we follow his commandments.[8]  As he said during his time on earth,

“Until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.  Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven.”                                                                                                 Matthew 5.18,19

The premier commandment of Yeshua is that we love God and our neighbor, but it is impossible to love God and our fellow man in a context of abandonment of the Sinai covenant.  Yeshua said,

“As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. Now remain in my love.  If you obey my commands you will remain in my love, just as I have obeyed my Father’s commands and remain in his love.  My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you.”                                                               John 15.9,10

Yeshua is not at all satisfied if we cobble together a worship of our own making while abandoning the commands of the covenant.  He said to the Pharisees that their teachings were but “rules taught by men,” and added,

“You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men….You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions.”                                                                         Mark 7.8,9

The only interpretation of Paul which is consistent with the teachings of Yeshua is, not that the Law is cast aside, but rather that the covenant supremacy of the Law has been exchanged for the new covenant supremacy of the living word from the mouth of our living  king, the living word of our king spoken directly into the heart of his subject.  This has been accomplished through the explicit advent of Yeshua’s redemption and his provision of his Spirit by which we live in his immediate presence.

Yeshua’s expectations of us are not somehow depreciated because he has provided the grounds of redemption.  If the expectations of the commandments were not significant in the extreme, then Yeshua’s suffering on the cross would be an obscenity.  His covenant expectations are higher than ever:

“For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and    the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.”                                                                                                                     Matthew 5.20

The difference is that we now live within his life.  He in us.  We in him.  The love of the law is from its very root and origin in and from him.  “He in us” is the fulfillment of the promise of Jeremiah that Yahveh would place “the law within our hearts.”  Our attention therefore is free to be focused on the love of our king and the love of our neighbor and even our enemy, all of whom are loved and fall under the claim of our king.  Yeshua leads us in the attainment of the fulfillment of the law, after the manner of a patient father leading and teaching his children.  He seeks us out as sentient and devoted subjects of the realm, not as indifferent children who disdain the expectations of the Father.


The erosion of the covenant

The covenant is in great distress.  And so our king ponders, “Will I find faith when I return?”  The covenant erodes as Satan succeeds in dismantling our understanding of the critical elements of the covenant.  Failure of knowledge becomes failure of understanding.  Failure of understanding becomes failure of appreciation,        and that becomes love grown cold, the end of real allegiance.

1.] The first and most essential element of the covenant: it is the word of our sovereign king that union between God and men is founded exclusively upon the blood of Christ shed at the cross.

“Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the first born from the dead, and the prince over kings of earth… who loves us and has loosed us from our sins by shedding his blood.”                                                               Revelation 1.5

To this fundamental event we are called to respond by opening the heart to the presence and love and dominion of our king.  Even more, in a world which is perishing, we are called to stand in the breach and hold up this fundamental truth for the world to know, never to compromise with the myriad factions who attempt to dillute this truth.

Historically, however, the church itself has conceived obscene deceptions to disguise this truth from those who seek God – all in order to take to itself the dominion and authority which the true covenant bestows upon our God.  Satan, throughout the centuries of Catholic domination of Christian worship, has undone the understanding of the absolute and final power of the sacrifice of Yeshua.  The Catholic institution introduced the doctrine that, for salvation, a person can not depend on the power of the cross alone. Rather the individual must look to the additional support of the endless succession of bloodless sacrifices in the mass, as well as to the merit of the suffering and good works of the individual, rendering him who seeks God always somewhere short of knowing himself bound to God, rendering the covenant without meaning and without power – transferring all power conveniently to the institution of the Catholic church and its administration of “sacraments.”  An increasing number of Protestant sects also place value in eucharistic “magic” and the unending cycle of bloodless eucharistic sacrifice, essentially mocking the power of the true blood of the covenant.

2.] The second major element of the covenant:  it is the testament of our sovereign king that we are to obey his word, his royal law, his commandments.  A code which defines the behavior of the constituent parties, particularly the behavior of the subject toward his Lord, is an essential component of every covenant.  Conversely  it is implicit in our obedience to his royal law that we recognize the kingship of our covenant Lord and that we honor the covenant union as the substrate of our royal kingdom.

Yeshua described clearly the covenant condition that he gives all his life for us his people and, in response, we who love him do truly listen for his voice and follow his direction:

“I am the good shepherd.  The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep….My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me.”[9] John 10.11,27

“If you love me, you will obey what I command….Whoever has my commands  and obeys them, he is the one who loves me.”                    John 14.15,21

“My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends.”         John 15.12,13

As he has loved us, so are we called to offer our lives in service to his will.  This is the call of the covenant, to the last measure of devotion..

The church on the whole scorns the integrity and binding relevance of the commands given at Sinai.  These words of the Sinai covenant are, however, the most elementary basis of any life which intends to respect the lives of others and intends to honor God.  Yet huge swaths of the Protestant church disdain their significance, imagining that they individually are so bathed in the mercy and grace of God that He will never reproach them their rebellious lives.  Here again the covenant loses all power in the process of a slight of hand by which that power is transferred to the individual for his own pursuit of pleasure.

The Catholic institution has eliminated the second commandment and has established the absolute replacement of the fourth commandment by open rejection and sixteen centuries of denial throughout all of Christendom.

The elimination of the second commandment [You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in the heavens above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below.] conveniently makes room for the adoration of the eucharistic host, the adoration of the saints, and the adoration of the mortal woman Mary as Queen of Heaven.

As for the fourth commandment, the Catholic institution takes great pride in announcing that its power to change the day of worship from the Sabbath, as clearly directed in the fourth commandment, to the day of the Sun, is evidence of “the power granted by God to the church to ordain tradition” and contravene the words of Scripture!   So again, the power and authority and honor which rightly belong to God, including the honor of the seventh day on which God rested from the activity of Creation – this power is transferred to an illegitimate institution and this honor is transferred from the miracle of creation to the God of the sun, who is none other than Lucifer himself.

In addition, Catholics and Protestants alike disregard the fundamental truth that Yeshua is this day king upon the throne of Israel.   Catholics since the day of Constantine have done their best to disassociate Yeshua from Israel.  Now Protestants and Catholics alike happily assign the name “Israel” to the secular Zionist entity which seizes the land of Palestinians in the name of divine right.  Protestant dispensationalists [the majority of fundamentalists] believe that Yeshua is no king, having been “rejected” by “Israel.”

3.]  The third critical element of the covenant: it is the testament of all of Scripture that our great hope as the children of the covenant is to share in the promises to Abraham: to be in total union with our God in the land of promise on this earth.  Beginning in the 4th century, Satan has worked skillfully and patiently to destroy the understanding of the subjects of Yeshua that the promises to Abraham are the core of their hope.  Now the church looks for its paradise “in the heavenlies” with no understanding that we are to stand in battle and see the victorious return of our king to this earth where he will establish us under his love in the land of promise.


Faithful to the covenant

            “You are my king and my God.”                                     Psalm 44.4

The covenant defines the allegiance of subject to king.  We have noted that our covenant with Yahveh has passed through a progression.  The real progress of the covenant is the narration of a most wonderful transformation: the covenant which was external and explicit – even carved in stone – has become Spirit: internal and transcendent.  So the kingdom has been transformed from geo-political nation state to transcendent City of God, its throne in the heavens, its roots in the hearts of men around the world.

In the same vein we must note that the sign of the covenant has also been transformed – from an external and physical mark to an internal and spiritual engraving.

Yahveh concluded his covenant with Abraham with the condition that male children of the covenant must be marked with the outward sign of circumcision:

“Every male among you shall be circumcised.  You are to undergo circumcision, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and you.  My covenant in your flesh is to be an everlasting covenant.”                                                                   Genesis 17.10,11,13

Over time, however, men in their thinking substituted the mark of the covenant for true satisfaction of the original order of the covenant, which was a call to the trust and obedience which produce union:

“Walk before me and be thou whole hearted.  I will confirm my covenant between me and you.”                                                               Genesis 17.1,2

Forty years after the exodus, when time came to confirm the Sinai covenant with the generation which was preparing to enter into Canaan, Yahveh warned the people that there is no participation in the life of the covenant short of the devotion of the heart to Yahveh:

“Make sure there is no man or woman, clan or tribe among you today whose heart turns away from Yahveh our God to go and worship the gods of those nations; when such a person hears the words of this [covenant] oath, he invokes a blessing on himself and therefore thinks, ‘I will be safe, even though I persist in going my own way.’  This will bring disaster on the watered land as well as the dry.  Yahveh will never be willing to forgive him: his wrath and zeal will burn against that man….Yahveh will single him out from all the tribes of Israel for disaster.”                                                     Deuteronomy 29.18,19,20,21

Then, following these warnings to the people, Yahveh indicated that he knew in advance that the people would not adhere to the covenant, and that as a result he would see them overtaken by their enemies and dispersed among the nations.  But he followed this prophesy with a promise of hope, that a day was coming when they would seek God and his covenant commandments with all their hearts:

“…and when you and your children return to Yahveh your God and obey him with all your heart and with all your soul according to everything I command you today, then Yahveh your God will restore your fortunes and have compassion on you and gather you again from all the nations.”        Deuteronomy 30.2,3

Yahveh then promised a new and more profound sign of the covenant:

“Yahveh your God will circumcise your hearts and the hearts of your descendants, so that you may love him with all your heart and with all your soul and live.”                                                               Deuteronomy 30.6

This promise of the circumcision of the heart is congruent with Jeremiah’s conveyance of the promise of the new covenant:

“‘This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time,’ declares Yahveh.  ‘I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts.  I will be their God and they will be my people.’”                                                          Jeremiah 31.33

Centuries later Paul confirmed that the circumcision of the heart is the sign of the new covenant:

“A man is not a Jew if he is only one outwardly, nor is circumcision merely outward and physical.  No, a man is a Jew if he is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code.  Such a man’s praise is not from men, but from God.” Romans 2.29                                      

Furthermore, we see in Paul’s words that it is the Spirit of God alone which effects the circumcision of the heart.  It is the blood of Yeshua as sacrifice, the fundamental event of the new covenant, which makes the Spirit available to us.  Therefore we may equally say that the receipt of the Spirit of Yeshua into our hearts is that circumcision of the heart and is similarly the new sign of the new covenant:

“Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession.”                                                                                           Ephesians 1.13,14

By the presence and power of this Spirit we are bound to our king and to each other.  We are formed into the great and ancient and enduring people of God.  What was begun in Adam and restored in Abraham and guaranteed through Yeshua will find its completion in us, by the power of his Spirit:

 “As you come to him, the living Stone – rejected by men but chosen by God and precious to him – you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Yeshua the anointed king….You are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light. Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.”                                        I Peter 2.4,5,9,10



Before his conversion, Paul stood in supervision at the martyrdom of Stephen.  Stephen belonged to God and was marked by the seal of his Spirit.  It is recorded that through the presence of the Spirit in Stephen he was “full of God’s grace and power.”  The synagogue opposed him,

“but they could not stand up against his wisdom or the Spirit by whom he                                           spoke.”                                                                                                              Acts 6.10

So they seized him and brought him before the Sanhedrin, producing false witnesses who claimed that he spoke against Moses and the Law [which he did not do.]  The Sanhedrin asked if the accusations of the “witnesses” were true.

Stephen began by telling his accusers that their very presence in the land of Canaan was rooted in the promises of God to Abraham, for the sake of which promises Moses had led the people of God out of Egypt.

Stephen pointed out that Moses himself had foreseen the coming of the Messiah when he had said,

God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.”   Acts 7.37

Stephen reminded them that their fathers had refused to obey Moses so that God “turned away and gave them over to the worship of the heavenly bodies.”  [Acts 7.42]  He continued by telling them that their fathers had built a tabernacle and a temple to facilitate the presence of God among them and yet they refused to allow Him to rule in their hearts.  Stephen then cried out,

“‘You stiff-necked people with uncircumcised hearts and ears!  You are  just like your fathers:  You always resist the Holy Spirit!  Was there ever a prophet your fathers did not persecute?  They even killed those who predicted the coming of the Righteous One.  And now you have betrayed and murdered him – you who have received the law that was put into effect through angels but have not obeyed it.’

“When they heard this, they were furious and gnashed their teeth at him.  But Stephen, full of the Holy Spirit, looked up to heaven and saw the glory of God and Jesus standing at the right hand of God.  ‘Look,’ he said, ‘I see heaven open and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.’”        Acts 7.51-56

Stephen stood in covenant loyalty to his God.  Stephen’s root criticism of his accusers was that they did not own that Spiritual circumcision which is the true sign of fealty to  the covenant.

Stephen stood in the truth that Yeshua is the prophesied “Righteous One,” the one who  brings healing to his people in being “pierced for our transgressions.”  Stephen stood firm in the truth that Yeshua rules from the heavens, “standing at the right hand of God,” in royal authority with the Father.  Stephen stood in witness to the power and authority of the commandments of the covenant.  Stephen stood in the hope of God’s covenant with Abraham.

“Yelling at the top of their voices, they all rushed at him, dragged him out of the city and began to stone him…. While they were stoning him, Stephen prayed, ‘Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.’  Then he fell on his knees and cried out, ‘Lord, do not hold this sin against them.’”                               Acts 7.57,58,59,60

Stephen stood in the truth of the love of Yahveh for all mankind.

© Copyright 2013

Lawrence S. Jones




[1] Acts 3.18: “But this is how God fulfilled what he had foretold through all the prophets, saying that his Christ would suffer.”

[2] George Eldon Ladd, “Historic Premillennialism”, The Meaning of the Millennium, pp. 30,31, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL, 1977

[3] See Charles Chiniquy, The Woman and the Confessional

[4] Threshold of Hope, p.3, 1994

[5] Galatians 3.16 “The Scripture does not say ‘and to seeds,’ meaning many people, but ‘and to your seed,’ meaning one person, who is Christ.”

[6] John 8.56 “Abraham rejoiced to see my day; he saw it and was glad.”

[7] Genesis 15.6

[8] Revelation  2.4; 2.23; 12.17; 14.12; 18.4; 21.7,8,27

[9] John 10.11,27

To Him Alone


, , , , , , , , , ,



An  inviolable truth

Solomon holds his sword high, about to cleave the infant in two.  The false mother says, “Let it be done.  Divide the child.  It is just.”  The true mother cries out, “No! Let my own hopes be crushed, but let the child be kept whole!”

So in the courts of philosophy and religion.  Many are the false midwives who are ready to see the truth divided, declaring all inspiration to be equal: “Let the Hindus sport a leg and the Buddhists an arm and the Catholics a severed head: in the end it’s all one truth, and we, in an orgy of mediocrity, can celebrate together our love for the semblance of truth.”

But the few who know their God will never let that knowledge be divided or degraded.  They will never agree that a limb or a head has the worth of a truth more precious than life itself.  This is the faith of the martyrs, that faith which is offensive to the world, that faith which enables those who have it to live and speak without compromise.

How does one come to such a faith?  What is this faith that I should want it?  In whom is faith that I should trust and follow?  What bond is faith that I should never let him go?


The soul as the medium and residence of faith

In searching beyond what is given, in searching beyond the witness of the senses and beyond the conclusions of reason, faith begins.

The scientist undertakes his research with “faith” that some unknown can be found.  However, to establish his discoveries, he only allows the witness of a logic rooted in experimentation, observation, and measurement.  This is appropriate to the study of the material world.  Any claim that all truth must submit to such a program is equivalent to a pre-judgment that there is no reality beyond the material.

Just such a narrow perspective has held dominion in the last century.  Yet, in times past, men of science, believing that the spectrum of reality stretched beyond the material world, were not so stunted in their thinking that they could not enjoy both the witness of the senses and the witness of the heart.  Galileo, Newton, Pascal, Faraday and a host of others found no conflict between the investigation of matter and a certainty of God which begins in faith.  For them, thinking and logic were relevant also to faith, though faith be rooted in the private judgments of the heart.

Faith, then, is a faculty which appropriately belongs to such a person, to someone who believes that the scope of reality surpasses that which the tools of science are able to ascertain and who believes that the heart can be a reliable witness in determining that truth.  This faculty, belief in the witness of the heart, can only be exercised by those who believe that the word “heart” may refer to something more than the organ which pumps their blood.

It is essential – in spite of all that science or Darwin might have to say – it is essential that we recognize that a human being transcends mind and body: that we have an essential core which is our invisible and eternal Address; that we have a core which owns expectation and purpose and suffering and discernment such as appear from deep within ourselves, such as far exceed the memories and conclusions and generalizations of experience; in sum, that we have a core which in and of itself is capable of extreme intelligence.

Just as Genesis describes separately the creation of the soul and the formation of the body, so King David in the Psalms refers to the two levels of our being:

“For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. …My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place.  When I was woven together in the depths of the earth, your eyes saw my unformed body.”  Psalm 139.13,15,16

Darwin’s journey upward out of the primeval slime implicitly portrays the eternal and independently existing soul as incongruous with his “human animal.”  Since the folly of Darwinism has been radically successful in the modern age, rooting out belief even in our own existence, there remain very few individuals who are ready for profound faith.

Since faith becomes that faculty by which the human person reaches through the unknown and touches God, there must be something real at both ends of the mystical wire – a real God and a real and conscious soul inhabiting “the heart’s house.”

It is our soul that is our address, that center in us which goes to God apart from all loss of mind and body.  Our soul gathers to itself multiple terms: person, spirit, ego, heart, self.  In dreams the soul reveals itself surrounded by history and purposes and wounds which are unknown to us in our conscious experience.  Spirit is associated with soul.  However difficult “spirit” might be to identify, we popularly refer to it as an indicator of the life of the soul.

The soul has other accoutrements to which we commonly refer.  It is normal to speak of rationality, propriety, and sexuality as independent and warring forces within the heart, as in dreams they often appear in the guise of independent personae.  In our daily conduct it is normal that we do not “bare the soul” or present to the world the whole sum of who we are.  Rather we present to the world an edited version of ourselves which is commonly called our Persona.  There is a great complex environment surrounding the soul, and it is for this reason that it can be useful to speak not only of the soul but also,  more inclusively and metaphorically, of the “heart” or “heart’s house.”


Spiritual perception and the ring of truth

Believing in the existence of my own soul, I am able to believe that I truly exist.  This is belief which often comes only through pain, through listening to cries which emerge from deep within our own being, cries which we have not imitated from another source, cries which call out from dark corners which we never knew.  These are the cries of trauma, of hope, of ambition, of despair – cries so earnest that they frighten us because we are shocked at the urgency of their appearance.  It is perhaps no accident that the ability of the soul to recognize God seems more acute when we are in distress.

Within these cries, if we are fortunate and have not had our spirits crushed, there may emerge a cry that calls out for “the one who brings order to the heart’s house, the awaited one, the anticipated one.”  This is the One who is sought in faith, whom only faith can find, whom only a life of faith can come to know.

Believing in the existence of my own soul I am made able to learn that I have significance in the consciousness of my Creator, that I am seen, that he knows me.

“You know when I sit and when I rise; you perceive my thoughts from afar.  You discern my going out and my lying down; you are familiar with all my ways.  Before a word is on my tongue you know it completely, O Yahveh.”

Psalm 139.2-4

The promise of Yeshua is even more radical:

“And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor to be with you forever – the Spirit of truth.  The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him.  But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you.  I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you.”             John 14.16-18

As for the scientist or the composer or the artist, early faith is labor in hope: it is a great deal of searching and experimenting, a great deal of thrashing about.  But faith becomes informed.  For the composer, he is informed by his own efforts, by the compositions of those who have come before him, and by the sound that rings true.  For the one who is searching for God, he is informed by his own persistence, by the words of God preserved in writing, and by the very presence of God speaking to the heart.  The living God reaches into our lives.  He has made us to seek him and he has ordered the world and our individual experience to make it possible that we should find him, that he should ultimately hold us in his embrace.

Intelligent faith eventually arrives at belief in the existence of a real object of faith.    That object is God as Person, for the satisfaction of the quest of faith will not ring true until the searcher recognizes in the object of his faith that same passion and hope and suffering which distinguishes and describes his own person.  God made us in his image.  He made us in the image of his person.  The person is the atomic unit of spiritual reality.


Belief in the in-historical God leads to fire and smoke

Belief is the threshold of faith.  Is it the whole of faith?  James, brother of the Messiah of Israel, said No:

“You believe that there is one God.  Good!  Even the demons believe that – and shudder….”  James 2.19

Belief must become life, so that our original goal is attained – that we touch God, know God, live with God, and become bound to God.

The believer must learn the character of his God through study of the history of all that God has done to gather mankind to himself.  This basic education must come from the recorded words of God.

“As the rain and the snow come down from heaven, and do not return to it without watering the earth and making it bud and flourish, so that it yields seed for the sower and bread for the eater, so is my word that goes out from my mouth.  It will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it.”                              Isaiah 55.10,11

In the course of this education we discover that our God is at the heart of human history and that he is with us in the present moment.  We learn that he is not like the god of Aristotle, rapt in introversion at the center of the heavens.  Rather he is the God of Abraham and Moses and David, the God of fire and smoke, reaching out for mankind:

“Our God comes and will not be silent; a fire devours before him, and around him a tempest rages.  He summons the heavens above, and the earth that he may judge his people: ‘Gather to me my consecrated ones, who made a covenant with me by sacrifice.’”                                                 Psalm 50.3,4,5

The  perception that our God is conscious of us may overwhelm us and leave us stricken with despair: he may seem to threaten our being because of the vast difference between us of and scale and virtue.  Evidence of the one whom we seek renders us increasingly concerned that he is more than we can know.

“You hem me in – behind and before; you have laid your hand upon me.  Such knowledge is too wonderful for me, too lofty for me to attain.  Where can I go from your Spirit?  Where can I flee from your presence?”    Psalm 139.5-7

Even the finite appearance of the Angel of God caused dread to the parents of Samson in the time of the judges:

He [the angel] replied, “Why do you ask my name?  It is beyond understanding.”…Manoah took a young goat and sacrificed it on a rock to Yahveh….As the flame blazed up from the altar toward heaven, the angel of Yahveh ascended in the flame…Manoah realized that it was the angel of Yahveh.  “We are doomed to die!” he said to his wife.  “We have seen God!” 

Judges 13. 18-22

The perception that the Creator of all worlds holds us in his consciousness leads us to consciousness of our helplessness and unworthiness, strangely compounded with the opposing conviction that we are intensely desired by our God.


Healing the breach: the Messianic prophesy and the advent of Yeshua

How are we to deal with this?  Our first reaction might be anger, as if we have been led into the discovery of an unbearable gulf which can not be bridged, led to the desire of that which we can never know.  But the education of faith must lead us to the discovery of all that our God has done to gather us to himself.  Isaiah told us of it all, and he wrote it down, centuries before it ever happened:  the messianic [designated king] Son of God would come in all the being and presence of the Father:

“For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.  Of the increase of his government and of peace there will be no end, on the throne of David and over his kingdom, to establish it and to uphold it with justice and with righteousness from this time forth and forevermore.  The zeal of the Lord of hosts will do this.”      Isaiah 9.6,7

What does he do that makes the difference?  He comes to show us the way to himself.

“Comfort, comfort my people, says your God.  Speak tenderly to Jerusalem, and cry to her that her warfare is ended, that her iniquity is pardoned…He will tend his flock like a shepherd; he will gather the lambs in his arms; he will carry them in his bosom, and gently lead those that are with young…”    Isaiah 40.1,2,11

How does he bridge the gulf between us?  Here is the mystery which offends mankind.  He bridges the gulf at the cross.

“Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted.  But he was wounded for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his stripes we are healed.  All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned – every one – to his own way; and Yahveh has laid on him the iniquity of us all.  …Yet it was the will of Yahveh to put him to grief; when his soul makes an offering for guilt, he shall see his offspring;…Out of the anguish of his soul he shall see and be satisfied; by his knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant, make many to be accounted righteous, and he shall bear their iniquities.”    Isaiah 53.4-11

How does restoration come about when we have known nothing but rebellion?  He penetrates our individual lives and brings us the healing presence of his Spirit.

“For thus says the One who is high and lifted up, who inhabits eternity, whose name is Holy: ‘I dwell in the high and holy place, and also with him who is of a contrite and lowly spirit, to revive the spirit of the lowly, and to revive the heart of the contrite.  For I will not contend forever, nor will I always be angry; for the spirit would grow faint before me, and the breath of life that I made….I have seen his ways, but I will heal him; I will lead him and restore comfort to him and his mourners, creating the fruit of the lips.  Peace, peace, to the far and to the near,’ says Yahveh, ‘and I will heal him.’”    Isaiah 57.15-18

We discover that Yeshua of Nazareth, born into Israel twenty centuries ago, is the one who has come to fulfill all the prophecies of Isaiah.[1]  We learn that he entered the world and went as king to the cross, standing in for us his people, dressing us in his colors, making us his own, opening for us every freedom to come into the presence of our heavenly Father.

The response of faith is to acknowledge what Yeshua has done and to give up every effort to achieve our own righteousness before God.  As Isaiah wrote,

“…all our righteous deeds are like a polluted garment.  We all fade like a leaf, and our iniquities, like the wind, take us away.”   Isaiah 64.6

We give up the labor of making ourselves righteous and by faith we trust in him and what he, Yeshua, has done to make us whole and restore us to our God – even conquering the curse of death which stood over us since the fall.


The one who enters and brings order to the house

Is this the journey of faith, to come to him for our redemption?  Yes, it is faith, but it is only the beginning.  We set out on a path and we ran into a great obstacle: our willful sinfulness and rebellion and finitude up against his majesty and honor and faithfulness.  We discovered the reconciliation which He alone accomplished by reaching into history and becoming one of us and taking upon himself the whole weight of  human rebellion.  We are reconciled to him.  But we must go farther.

We have heard his call and we have come to him to know him.  We have come to him for healing.  We have heard his promise of healing.  We know that if we are to have a life in his presence we must be healed, not only of the stains in our history, but also healed in our present being, so that we can know him openly and freely.  He must give us a new heart.  He must bring order and peace into the heart’s house.

How does order come to the house?  Order comes to the house when the house is yielded to the one to whom it rightly belongs.  He alone can rule the house with authority and love and understanding.  He alone can know the deepest aspirations of the human heart and instruct us day by day in all that we need to know in order to fill out the great hope of our humanity, that seed which he planted in us.  He our God has come to us and we must open the secret core of our being to him.

“Behold I stand at the door and knock.  If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and sup with him and he with me.”    Revelation 3.20

This day must come.  We must open ourselves and yield to his entry.  Yeshua said,

“I am the bread of life….I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever.  This bread is my flesh which I give for the life of the world…..Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.  Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him.  Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me.”   ….Aware that his disciples were grumbling about this, Jesus said to them, “Does this offend you?  …The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing.  The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life.”  John 6.48,51,53-57

Yeshua was speaking as graphically as possible to tell his disciples that they must truly open their core being to the presence of the Spirit of Yeshua himself, and that this becomes their sustenance and their healing.

This life of intimacy with our redeemer becomes that life in which we go beyond all academic knowledge of him.  We become like the neighbors of the Samaritan woman after they spent hours at his feet:

They said to the woman, “We no longer believe just because of what you said; now we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this man really is the Savior of the world.”    John 4.42

We also are led by him to know him through the historical record of all that he has said and done, this record being all the Scriptures of both the old and new covenants.  The role of Yeshua begins in the first verse of Genesis, as John has told us clearly:

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  He was with God in the beginning.  Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.  In him was life, and that life was the light of men….The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us.  We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.  No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.   John 1.1-4,14,18

In our broadening knowledge of our redeemer we are led into all the vast mysteries of this world and encouraged by God never to stop asking questions, never to cease to explore the riches of his person.  As Paul wrote,

“My purpose is that they may be encouraged in heart and united in love, so that they may have the full riches of complete understanding, in order that they may know the mystery of God, namely, Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge….all things were created by him and for him.  He is before all things and in him all things hold together…..For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.”                                                   Colossians 2.2,3; 1.17,19,20

Who is this whose life stretches from the cross to the present to the depths of Creation?  It is our God, even the one who would inhabit the human heart.  His Spirit is meant to rule within our heart, to instruct our souls, to encourage our spirit, to honor him.  It is only someone of intrinsic worth who can be said to deserve a great teacher.  We are that person of worth.  He is that teacher.  It is for us to become honor to him.


Royal power, the throne of heaven and the celestial architecture 

But we must go farther.  We have opened our hearts to him, and we are learning to love him, and we are discovering the peace which he brings to the court of our soul’s house, and we are made conscious that this power which he exercises over our entire being is greater than any power on earth.  Until he comes, the soul is at war with itself, battling through darkness, desperately attempting to give the reigns of power to the voice of the warrior or the scholar or the lover or the cynic or the tyrant, never finding peace for lack of the only hand that knows and cares and guides and truly loves the human heart.

By his power the heart is healed.  And the certainty of his healing and his presence is the certainty that there is some function of the celestial order which binds the heavens to the surface of the earth.  As Jacob saw and as Yeshua himself avowed, the heavens are joined to earth by a ladder, a stairway, and that stairway is Yeshua, the Messiah of Israel.

He [Jacob] had a dream in which he saw a stairway resting on the earth, with its top reaching to heaven, and the angels of God were ascending and descending on it.     Genesis 28.12

Jesus said, “I tell you the truth, you shall see heaven open and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man.”   John 1.51

In the presence of his power in the heart and in consciousness of his royal seat in the heavens we are pressed to recognize that his royal kingdom spreads on invisible cords  throughout the world.  We cannot help but see throughout the old covenant Scriptures that Yeshua alone fulfills the Messianic expectation, a rule which reaches to his subjects in this world and binds them to himself, yet a kingdom which transcends the form of the kingdoms of this world.  This our kingdom is that rock cut out of a mountain but not by human hands, that rock to be formed in the time of the historic earthly kingdoms:

“In the time of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people.  It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever.  This is the meaning of the vision of the rock cut out of a mountain, but not by human hands.”    Daniel 2.44,45

We can not help but see Yeshua as our king, as royal lord over all that we are.  And now our mind is opened to all that is written in the Scriptures to assert his kingship.

When he came near the place where the road goes down the Mount of Olives, the whole crowd of disciples began joyfully to praise God in loud voices for all the miracles they had seen:

‘Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord.’…

Some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to Jesus, ‘Teacher, rebuke your disciples!’

‘I tell you,’ he replied, ‘if they keep quiet, the stones will cry out.

                                                                                    Luke 19.37-40

Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews.  But now my kingdom is from another place.” 

“You are a king, then!” said Pilate.

Jesus answered, “You are right in saying I am a king.”  John 18. 36,37

“These are the words of the true Holy One, who holds the key of David, who opens and none shall shut, who shuts and none shall open.”   Revelation 3.7

“These are the words of the first and the last, who was dead and came to life.”    Revelation 2.8

“All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.  Therefore go and make disciples of all nations….and surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

“Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and sup with him and he with me.  And the conqueror shall sit beside me on my throne as I myself have also conquered and sat down beside my Father on his throne.”      Revelation 3.20,21

“Grace be to you and peace from he who is and was and is coming, and from the seven spirits before his throne, and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the prince over kings of earth.”  Revelation 1.4,5

“For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, and you have been given fullness in Christ, who is the head over every power and authority.”    Colossians 2.9,10

The Israel of God is not one of the nations, nor shall our Messiah ever cast a vote in the assemblies of the nations.  Yeshua is one with the Father and his kingship is eternal, from the beginning of time to the end of time.  He came iconically into Jerusalem on a donkey to demonstrate that as king he came to bring peace to his people, to as many as receive him.

“Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God.”    John 1.13

When Yeshua made his triumphal entry into Jerusalem it was not a dress rehearsal for some future event.  When Yeshua shall return in splendor to destroy the armies of lawlessness, John tells us that,

“On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.”      Revelation 19.16

Between that day when Yeshua entered Jerusalem on a donkey and the day when he shall return in splendor, there is no mention of a coronation in Scripture, for he is king on the heavenly throne – the throne over eternal Israel – yesterday, today, and forever. 


Heirs of the promises to Abraham

“Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross.  It read: JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS.”      John 19.19

When Charles DeGaulle was asked to compromise his expectations in the provisions for nations after World War II, due to the fact that only a minority of the French populace had openly opposed the Nazis, he replied, “I fought the Resistance: France fought the Resistance!

So Yeshua stands in the council of heaven before the throne of God, announcing to all, “I paid the price of sin: my people have paid the price of sin.”  By God’s grace we are accepted in identity with Yeshua our king.  As king, Yeshua stood in for us his people.  He went to the cross for us, the king for his people.  In learning that Yeshua is King of the Jews, in learning that he is king over my soul in all royal power, I discover that I belong to the ancient holy people of God.  I discover that I share in the ancient promises to Abraham:

“You are all sons of God through faith in Messiah Jesus, for all of you who were baptized into Messiah have clothed yourselves with Messiah.  There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Messiah Jesus.  If you belong to Messiah, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”            Galatians 3.26-29

This means that the promise which is the very definition of the hope of Israel is my promise also.  I live in the hope of Israel for eternity and I live in the hope of Israel in this present moment.  Furthermore, the birth pains of Israel are my birth pains, for the salvation of my life has depended on every nuance of the history of my people.  My own life was being saved as Moses led the descendants of Abraham out of Egypt.

The law given at Sinai was coming to earth for me, to guide me and direct me to know the ways of my God.

I ask, as Moses asked, “Teach me your ways so that I may know you and continue to find favor with you.”  When Yahveh, as royal Lord over Israel, calls his people to keep his commandments and be bound to him by covenant, my heart is there, seeking to be bound to him by covenant.

Like the people of Israel, I discover that my heart fails, that I am wayward, that I am prone to reserve certain chambers of my heart as my own, places where I am amazed that he must also rule.  I, like Israel, wait in my heart for the realization in me of the new covenant:

“The time is coming,” declares Yahveh, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah.  It will not be like the covenant I made with their forefathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they broke my covenant though I was a husband to them,” declares Yahveh.   “This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time,” declares Yahveh.  “I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people.” Jeremiah 31.31-33  

“I will give them an undivided heart and put a new spirit in them; I will remove from them their heart of stone and give them a heart of flesh. Then they will follow my decrees and be careful to keep my laws. They will be my people, and I will be their God.”     Ezekiel 11.19,20

“And afterward I will pour out my Spirit on all people….” Joel 2.28


The new covenant: the heart called to the last measure of devotion

As Yeshua last commemorated Passover with his disciples he lifted a cup of wine and told of his blood about to be given sacrificially at the cross to initiate and seal the new covenant:

Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you.  This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.”    Matthew 26.27,28

What is a covenant?  It is a binding oath between individuals who wish to make the care and purpose of their lives coincident one with the other, even to the point of death.  As a life and death oath it is usually marked either by the enduring witness of some commemorative object or by the event of sacrifice, so witnessing the seriousness of the oath.

There are covenants of loyalty between equals.  Since ancient times, there are also covenants by which a sovereign binds himself to his people, where all the power of the king stands in defense of the life of his subject, and where the life of the subject is totally devoted to his king.  In such covenants there are expectations and there are promises, from sovereign and subject alike.  Such was God’s original covenant with Israel at Mount Sinai.

Under the old covenant it became clear that the guidance of the law and the will of a man are not sufficient to elevate him to grounds of real intimacy with his God.  The miracle of the new covenant is that God provides his Spirit to nourish us and teach us and give us a heart which desires his law, his will.

Yeshua held up the Passover cup, representing the shedding of his blood, and within hours he gave his life in covenant loyalty to redeem his people.  The significant fulfillment of his revolutionary promise, to impart to his subjects his Spiritual presence, was then initiated within days, on the feast of Pentecost.

In the journey of faith, we come to this moment when we are called beyond simple faith and trust, now to know that the sustenance of a life of loyalty within the covenant will come from God himself.  Yeshua says, Believe in me!  And then, to those who have a vision of his reality, he says, Follow me!

We are called to share in this covenant.  We are called to raise that glass and acknowledge his blood as shed for us.  We are called to enter into baptism claiming that his death is our death, claiming that we in our sinfulness are covered by the cleansing power of his blood. 

Should we go so far, then we go far beyond that simple belief which might have led us to that moment of baptism: we pass into the dreadful seriousness of a life and death covenant with the God who made us.


A people apart

Our lives are now his alone.  We have accepted that with the price of his life he has bought us back from death and we are not our own.  We now share the understanding of Jeremiah:

A man’s life is not his own; it is not for man to direct his steps.”

 Jeremiah 10.23

Our new life: He in us, and we in him, our lives contained in him:

My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me.  I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand.

   John 10.27,28

“Whoever serves me must follow me; and where I am, there will my servant be also.”                                                                     John 12.26

We are contained in him and we are sustained by him:

“If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching.  My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him.  He who does not love me will not obey my teaching.  These words you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me….The Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.”   John 14.23,24,26

Inside this covenant relationship with our God, we are separated, set apart to God:

“If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own.  As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world.  That is why the world hates you.  Remember the words I spoke to you: ‘No servant is greater than his master.’  If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also.”  John 15.19,20

“I have given them your word and the world has hated them, for they are not of the world any more than I am of the world.  My prayer is not that you take them out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one.  They are not of the world, even as I am not of it.  Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth. As you sent me into the world, I have sent them into the world.  For them I sanctify [set apart] myself, that they too may be truly sanctified [set apart for God].”    John 17. 14-19

The final words of Yeshua’s great prayer before going to the cross are a promise that the journey to our God will never end, that he will continually draw us deeper and deeper into the knowledge of him, that more and more clearly we will discover the face of our God until that day comes when we see him as he is:

“Righteous Father, though the world does not know you, I know you, and they know that you have sent me.  I have made you known to them, and will continue to make you known in order that the love you have for me may be in them and that I myself may be in them.”   John 17.25,26          

Lawrence S. Jones

Chicago, 2013


[1] Colossians 2.9; Colossians 1.15,19

The Temple, the Mosque, the Vatican, and Building 7: Chapter 14, Secular Israel as Golden Calf; the National Mythology as the Statue of the Beast

[Please access the complete book under the title, The Temple, the Mosque, the Vatican, and Building 7, listed in the “page” titles in the heading above.

Lawrence S. Jones, email:

Chapter 14: Secular Israel as Golden Calf ; The National Mythology as the Statue of the Beast

“Then I saw another Beast rising from the land; he had two horns like a lamb, but he spoke like a dragon.  He exerts the full authority of the first Beast in his presence, causing the earth and its inhabitants to worship the first Beast, whose deadly wound was healed.  He performs amazing miracles, even making fire descend from heaven on earth in the sight of men, and by dint of the miracles he is allowed to perform in presence of the Beast, he seduces dwellers on earth; he bids the dwellers on earth erect a statue to the Beast who lived after being wounded by the sword, and to this statue of the Beast he was allowed to impart the breath of life, so that the statue of the Beast should actually speak.  He has everyone put to death who will not worship the statue of the beast…”[1]



We have discussed under many settings the proposition of Scripture, the proposition of the prophets, and the proposition of Yeshua that there is no holy Temple, no holy people, no Israel of God apart from the work of the Spirit of God.  We have equally established in many contexts that this holy work of God by which he restores mankind to himself is founded on the cross of Yeshua, the eternal sacrifice to which every old covenant sacrifice looked forward in hope and expectation.  It is this holy work of the Spirit of God and its divine foundation which the world labors to deny, be it Satan in the garden, be it the Roman Catholic institution, be it inscriptions on the Dome of the Rock, be it apostate Protestant denominations denying the in-historical kingdom and denying that the in-historical promises to Abraham are the true inheritance of the children of Yeshua.

In this final chapter, having established that nearly every avenue of culture and religion conspires in this very denial, we see that the governments themselves share and benefit from this same misrepresentation of what it means to be a people of God.  So the nations, in particular the United States of America, support the modern mythology that the secular Zionist state of Israel is that very entity holy to God which deserves the cream of history, the promises to Abraham.  The United States adopts the cause célèbre of defending this surrogate “people of God” with all the apostate religions of the nation in tow.

In defense of this surrogate, this usurper of the holy name of “Israel,” the United States reaches out to defend us against our shared “enemies,” and in the process we run rampant through the world, bringing to its knees one Muslim state after another.  This is mythology in the service of power, mythology in the service of a roaring Beast.

When secular Israel becomes enshrined as an inviolable icon in the Western consciousness, we should consider whether or not we have been restored to the Roman paganism wherein heads of state design and control the shrines which otherwise would be the reserve of priests and shamans.  Scripture assures us that the final global empire is none other than Rome, and here is evidence of its resurgence.

This present assumption of divine prerogative by the state is born out in the fact that the state has become a purveyor of inviolable mythologies which its citizens must acknowledge.  Embodied in these mythologies are simple guidelines enabling the public to determine in an acceptable manner the forces of good and the forces of evil in the world.  These guidelines are meant to relieve us of the need to find fault with those who have power over us.

The state mythology of modern times is gradually assuming the proportions of “the statue of the Beast,” that edifice, mentioned in the Revelation of John, which must be worshiped if one does not wish to forfeit one’s life.

Like the great golden rendition of himself which Nebuchadnezzar presented to the people of Babylon for worship, we see that the myth-edifice is hollow, that it is a gross exaggeration of fact, and yet we accept that to despise it is unthinkable.  As President Bush advised us so shrewdly,

“If you are not with us, you are against us.”

The stature of this mythology is so immense that we shudder to think that it might be made of paste.  Movies feature it.  Wars are waged for the sake of it.  Citizens are arrested, tortured, rendered, and killed for failing to honor it.  For its sake drones and missiles violate the sovereignty of nations and curtail the lives of innocent families.  It is too awesome to imagine that this state-sanctioned mythology might be a web of lies.


One intended lesson of the prevailing Western mythology is that we live under a fearful threat of terrorism; at the base of this mythological fabrication lies a gross misrepresentation of what it means to be the holy people of God.  This distortion, as we have said, is but another edition of the same lies promulgated by the powers and the orthodoxies of the earth since the beginning of history.

On October 27, 1994, President Bill Clinton spoke before the Israeli Knesset in Jerusalem, and addressed this entirely secular institution as if they were the holy guardians of the divine covenant:

“’If you abandon Israel, God will never forgive you,’ [quoting the warnings of his childhood pastor]….It is God’s will that Israel, the biblical home of the people of Israel, continue for ever and ever….Your journey is our journey, and America will stand with you now and always.”[2]

Taking the atheist Zionist state as the inviolable darling of God, Clinton promised the resources of the United States in faithful and eternal support of all her purposes.  This mindset endures in the national character: our government does not flinch as Israel bulldozes the orchards and wells and homes of its Palestinian citizens.  It does not flinch as Israel surrounds these people with three-story concrete walls such as have not been seen in the civilized world, unless perhaps to enclose the Warsaw ghetto.  We do not flinch as the Zionist state robs land from its Palestinian citizens and annexes it to lands devoted to the welfare of Americans and Russians and Europeans who can prove that their mothers have an acceptable ancestry.  Nor do we flinch as the Zionist state rattles its sabers and plans for war with the state of Iran.  We, of course, will stand behind their “holy” purpose.  Their war will be our war.


On September 11, 2001, three controversial attacks took place, almost simultaneously, each involving the supposed hijacking of aircraft by Muslim terrorists.  Following the concerted attacks [on the Pentagon; on the World Trade Center; and a purported attempt on the Capitol by an airliner which crashed in a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania], the United States government claimed to have the names of the various hijackers and claimed to know that they belonged to a group called Al-Qaeda, a loosely structured Muslim terrorist organization under the control of a man named Osama bin Laden.

A video was ostensibly discovered by the U.S. government and released on December 13, 2001, in which Osama bin Laden “confessed” responsibility for the events of 9/11.  However, this video, besides conveying to the American public gross mistranslations, is of questionable authenticity.  Meanwhile, it is well established that on September 28, 2001, three weeks after 9/11 and one week before the war on Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden gave an interview to Ummat, a daily paper in Pakistan, in which he vigorously denied involvement in the events of 9/11:

“I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States.  As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie.  I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act.  Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people….Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed…..We are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom.  This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States.  It is simply that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the punishment should reach Israel.  In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the US is not uttering a single word….”[3]

Who should we believe?  Unfortunately the facts surrounding the events of 9/11 do not favor the claims of the United States government.  It is not my purpose here to weigh the government claims, as the evidence [visual, historical, and scientific] is available and ample on the internet.  I merely posit the general nature of the three 9/11 events.

1.  In Shanksville, Pennsylvania, although a large plane with many passengers is supposed to have crashed into the field, astonishingly little debris has ever been recovered and there were only traces of human remains…nothing to compare to the usual twisted fuselage and gruesome carnage associated with fatal airplane crashes.  A small amount of research reveals that the official investigation of the crash is stained with many suspicious circumstances.

2.  At the Pentagon, all possible security footage which might reveal the nature of the collision of the jetliner with the building has been gathered and stored as confidential.  The original hole in the side of the building was narrower than the distance between the two engines of the airplane accused of entry, while deep in the building the continuation of the damage was witnessed by an even narrower penetration through many yards of concrete fortification, as only a missile might do.  The scene of the attack was not secured in yellow tape and preserved for the witness of material evidence.  Rather it was immediately bulldozed in order to bury the material evidence.

3.  In New York, at the WorldTradeCenter, apparently each of the twin towers was struck by a large airliner, resulting in the collapse of both structures.  However, it is unprecedented that airplane collision or fire at the temperature of burning jet fuel should cause the collapse of a steel building.  The buildings, rather than wavering right or left, fell straight to the ground as in a controlled demolition, fell at nearly the rate of fall of a free-falling object.  In fact, analysis of the debris from the collapse of the towers reveals the extensive presence of traditional and nano-thermite explosives.  As soon as the steel debris of the towers could be gathered it was loaded into ships and sent to China to be melted down.

And then there is Building 7.  Across the street from the twin towers stood Building 7, a fifty story building with a massive footprint.  Not long after the collapse of the taller towers, Building 7, untouched by any aircraft, without known threat from any terrorist, without any serious threat or apology from any person at any time,…this building fell to the ground in what could only be a controlled [long planned and long prepared] demolition, also descending at nearly the rate of fall of free falling objects.  The internet is awash with videos of this bizarre event.

Controversy legitimately surrounds the other events of 9/11.  But there is no controversy surrounding Building 7.  There is no controversy because there is nothing to be said.  For the part of the government, Building 7 goes unmentioned.  Building 7, fallen, is an emblem of the falsehood of the claims of the United States government.  When Building 7 can be explained honestly, and with it the other tragedies of 9/11, then we may begin to believe that our government expects our allegiance to be rooted in reality, not in its mythology.

In the mythology which has been generated, we are given a falsified piece of theater, a supposed attack of Muslim terrorists against the heart of our greatest city, for the contrived reason that “they hate our free way of life and they are angry at us for supporting Israel.”  By forces within our government we have been given this “Pearl Harbor” event so that we will lend our hearts to the battle against the natural enemies of the Zionist state.  But at the core of this contrivance lies the deception so deeply seated in our culture, the misrepresentation of the secular Zionist state as the heirs to God’s covenant promises to Abraham.

As subjects of the Messiah of Israel, we can not acknowledge a false mythology which rests upon a misrepresentation of the true nature of the holy people of God.  To silently acknowledge this mythology is to enable the worship of a Beast. 

Many will say that there is no evidence of any “Beast” or “statue.”  To which we must reply: If now we are able to endure and acknowledge the most outrageous distortions of the truth, if now we can so bow before this most wicked mythology which ushers death to the nations of the Muslim world, then shall we really have a problem bowing down to a caricature of power or to a cartoonish statue when such a tiny gesture might preserve our families and our lives?

We must fear the judgment of God if we see this danger in the world and fail to warn our brothers.


In the first few centuries of the Christian era, during that short period before the installation of the state-sanctioned hierarchical church, followers of Yeshua greeted each other with the phrase, “Jesus is Lord.”  For them it was the core assertion that Yeshua is the anointed king of their transcendent kingdom, the long awaited Messiah of Israel, and that he is also the person of God.  Public identification with this core loyalty cost them their lives: it was an offense to Rome.  Rome needed to preserve the mythology that Israel is nothing more than a genetic group, whose leaders are bound within the sphere of Roman political power.  Rome could not tolerate the thought that Israel should be a power outside its control with a king beyond its control, a king who is also God, who holds his people to a call above the call of Roman power.

So now the resurgent Rome which rises from the ashes of history takes delight in its new rendition of the Final Solution: the apparent eradication of the Israel which is allied to Yahveh, the God of Israel, and the promotion of an Israel which is purely genetic, one of the nations, fitting comfortably within Roman global power.

The radical enthusiasm and spiritual power of New Covenant Israel, which fully survived the physical destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. by Rome – this enthusiasm and power now enjoyed by the Jewish and Gentile remnant within the enduring Israel of God – this was, for the broader culture, subsumed and rendered tame by Constantine and his Roman state religion.  Constantine favored and promoted the bishops who had been traditores in the persecutions of Diocletian, bought them off with basilicas, made himself the gracious arbiter of their theological differences, and married the filthy whole to the times and practices of his national pagan religion.  Orthodoxy became but a label for compromise with the state religion.

The comfort of modern religious life within the status quo is not due to some advanced condition wherein the modern Rome is more tolerant.  The comfort of the modern religious institution is due to the fact that it has given away the core being and the core assertion of the dissenting kingdom and in its stead has settled into a faith with purely personal ramifications.

This private “iPod” sort of faith will never be an offense to Rome.  Under the modern cultural regime of Tolerance you may believe whatever fantastical thing you want to believe about Jesus or about any other imaginary God, so long as it has no implications beyond your own personal being, so long as it suggests no political imperative which might be a challenge to the authority of Rome.

But the time of the witness, the time of the martyr, is at hand.  Only a handful of nations stand in the way of the completion of globalization.  Rome will soon raise its standard, claiming authority over the whole earth. Unless we are ready to give away our humanity, it will be necessary in this time to speak the truth that Rome does not want to hear: We who belong to the Messiah of Israel are the polis of God, true children of Abraham, not one of the nations.  We are the great and eternal political imperative of Yahveh, the God of Israel, the God of all worlds.

***   ***   ***   ***

 Lawrence S. Jones


[1] Revelation 13.11-15

[2] Vital Speeches 61, no.3 [November 15,1994]: 70 [3]

Quote for the day



“Of all conceivable forms of enlightenment, the worst is what these people call the Inner Light. Of all horrible religions the most horrible is the worship of the god within…. That Jones shall worship the god within him turns out ultimately to mean that Jones shall worship Jones….Christianity came into the world firstly in order to assert with violence that a man had not only to look inwards, but to look outwards, to behold with astonishment and enthusiasm a divine company and a divine captain.”

from “Orthodoxy” by G.K. Chesterton



, ,

I am posting here the “Maggid,” the telling of the Exodus, excerpted from the Passover Haggadah [The Alien’s Haggadah] which I have just posted in the Pages. I wrote this last year for Passover.    I welcome your comments and critique.                                                         Thank you, Lawrence Jones


We tell the story of the exodus.  The fifth part of the Haggadah is the Maggid, which means “the expounding.”   Everything is up for discussion.

Insiders may tell of the exodus as a reminiscence about ancestors.  But this is the Haggadah of the aliens.  We, like Abraham, are insiders who come from the outside.  We come in because God has put it in our hearts to do so.  We are free to scrutinize the narrative as we please, in order to see clearly how it belongs to us and why it matters that we retain its memory.

In the beginning God, perhaps, could have made the world to be static, like a mountain or a sculpture.  Perhaps it would have been a finished work.  But there would have been no room for human consciousness and freedom and the processes of learning and becoming.

God did not make the world to be static.  He made suns and planets in motion.  Inseparable from motion is time.  He made us and put us in this world where we live and learn in time.  Life takes time.  And time makes life possible.

An apparent tragedy took place in the time of our first beginnings. The world at large went into rebellion against its Creator.  The record suggests that God seemed to withdraw from the world for a while.

Then God discovered Abraham, a citizen of ancient Iraq, and came to him.  He found in him someone who refused to accept a world that did not include direct knowledge of the  God above all worlds.   Josephus claims that Abraham studied the sky and discovered that the planets are subordinate to an overarching order, and so concluded that none of them were gods, but that the true God must be above every elemental body.

Abraham is reputed to have gone into his father’s idol shop and broken all but one idol .  When his father asked what happened, Abraham told him that the one idol had done it.  Abraham’s father did not believe him.  Abraham took this as confirmation that even his father, the vendor of gods, knew better than to credit them with real power.

Abraham abandoned his country by God’s command.  God communicated broad objectives to him, and Abraham lived a nomad’s life in pursuit of them.  God set out to make a new beginning with Abraham, a project that would be completed over a long period of time.  God promised Abraham that from him would come kings and nations and a land for himself and for his children…but not right away.  To this day, the project is not complete.

The actual transcendence of that vision is mostly ignored in this time when so many claim a right, here and now, to the land of promise.  The book of Hebrews retains for us a record of the quality of that vision in the mind of Abraham and of Moses:

By faith Abraham, when called to go to a place he would later receive as his           inheritance, obeyed and went, even though he did not know where he was going.       By faith he made his home in the promised land like a stranger in a foreign country; he lived in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob, who were heirs with him of the same promise.  For he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God….All these people were still living by faith when they died.  They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance.  And they admitted that they were aliens and strangers on earth….

By faith Moses, when he had grown up, refused to be known as the son of Pharaoh’s daughter.  He chose to be mistreated along with the people of God rather than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a short time.  He regarded disgrace for the sake of the Messiah as of greater value than the treasures of Egypt, because he was looking ahead to his reward…By faith he kept the Passover and the sprinkling of blood, so that the destroyer of the firstborn would not touch the firstborn of Israel….These were all commended for their faith, yet none of them received what had been promised.  God had planned something better for us so that only together with us would they be made perfect.   [Hebrews 11]

God informed Abraham’s descendants that physical descent was only the circumstantial ground for participation in the promise.  Genetic Israel is the ancient amphitheater in which the world drama begins.  Real participation in the promise is a matter of consciousness and heart.  The promise to Abraham is a platform in history which furnishes to all of us the context in which to discover God acting in time and in history.  The hope of belonging to the people of God is for all people.

God, working in time, began with Abraham and started forming for himself a people.  He indicated from the beginning that progress would be convoluted.  He told Abraham that his near descendants would be enslaved inside a foreign nation for four hundred years, and that they would then come out and know liberation and continue on their way toward the fulfillment of the promise.

Abraham had a grandson, Jacob.  Jacob had twelve sons and one daughter.  Jacob’s favorite, Joseph, found himself victim to the jealousy of his brothers.  They held him in a pit and sold him to a passing caravan on its way to trade inEgypt.  God protected Joseph.  Joseph found favor inEgyptand became second only to the king.  Joseph’s entire family later joined him inEgypt.  They settled in Goshen, near the Nile delta.  About three hundred and fifty years later, Moses was born, a great grandson of Joseph’s brother Levi.  By this time the children of Abraham were in slavery.  The nobility of Joseph was forgotten, and the rugged community was judged by Pharaoh to need suppression.

Following the historic record of the Torah, the first stirrings of the exodus from Egypt were in the heart of God, as he ruminated on the end of the four hundred years and listened to the groaning of the descendants of Abraham.

Moses was raised as an insider to all the power and wealth ofEgypt.  At a time when Pharaoh was killing Hebrew children, the infant Moses had been discovered and adopted by a daughter of the king.  In maturity, however, his heart lay with the people of Abraham.  Unfortunately his passion surpassed his self control.  He made himself an outsider when he killed an Egyptian overlord who had been beating a Hebrew slave.

Moses escaped from Egypt, crossed theSinai peninsula, and arrived in Midian, where he found welcome in the home of a priest named Jethro.  Moses married his daughter, Zipporah.  He spent most of the next forty years in the hills of the Sinai, caring for the sheep of his new father-in-law, Jethro.


The success of the Exodus hinged upon God’s revelation of the truth of his being and the nature of his character to two individuals, Moses and the Egyptian king.  God established the condition that he would illustrate in Egypt his power above every petty idol until the pharaoh, of his own will, would respect God’s demand that the children of Abraham be set free.

But Moses also had to learn who God is before he could actually serve God in the project which was assigned to him. His individual purchase upon the being and person of God was his profound starting point, above every point of skill or courage or education.

Moses was leading his father-in-law’s sheep across Mt. Horeb, also known as Mt.  Sinai and “the mountain of God.”  Here on this mountain God came before Moses to tell him of his concern for Moses and his people, and to explain to him that he, Moses, should become the central figure in a plan to free his people fromEgypt.

Now Moses was tending the flock of Jethro his father-in-law, the priest of Midian, and he led the flock to the far side of the desert and came to Horeb, the mountain of God.  There the angel of God [Malach Yahveh] appeared to him in flames of fire from within a bush.  Moses saw that though the bush was on fire it did not burn up. So Moses thought, I will go over and see this strange sight – why the bush does not burn up.

When Yahveh saw that he had gone over to look, God [Elohim] called to him from within the bush, “Moses! Moses!”  

And Moses said, “Here I am.”

“Do not come any closer,” God said.  “Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy ground.”  Then he said, “I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob.”  At this Moses hid his face, because he was afraid to look at God.

The being and character of God began to unfold before Moses.  God had now appeared before him as the angel of God.  He had announced himself to be Eternal God, and he had introduced himself in terms of his role in Moses’ roots and personal history.

The Lord said, “I have indeed seen the misery of my people in Egypt.  I have           heard them crying out because of their slave drivers, and I am concerned about      their suffering.  So I have come down to rescue them from the hand of the Egyptians and to bring them up out of that land into  a good and spacious land, a land flowing with milk and honey…So now, go.  I am sending you to Pharaoh to bring my people the Israelites out of Egypt.”

Moses now presented to God a long line of excuses, questioning his own being, wondering whether he was really of a nature to lead a people out ofEgypt.

But Moses said to God, “Who am I that I should go unto Pharaoh, and that I          should bring forth the children of Israel out of Egypt?”

            And God said, “I will be with you…”  [Ehyeh imach]

This response was spoken in the Hebrew imperfect tense, expressing action which is both present and continuous into the future.  We also consider that the verb “to be” has a more active meaning [“the act of being”] in Hebrew than in English.  It would be more accurate to translate the response of God to Moses as,

Now and on into the future, I am and shall be being with you.”

Moses now ventured to ask another question, ostensibly for the sake of his presentation to the people back inEgypt, but undoubtedly also for his own assurance:

Moses said to God, “Suppose I go to the Israelites and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’  Then what shall I tell them?”                                                                Exodus 3.13

In the drama of a visual and audible encounter with God, it was reasonable, if one had the courage, to ask God his name.  And it was clever to ask it obliquely, as Moses did here.

The “God of his fathers” had been known to his fathers as “Master” and “Almighty God”, names which speak generically of omnipotence and lordship over the earth.  God had also revealed himself to them in daily events in the persona of the angel of God, but in those moments he had spoken of himself as “God” [ELOHIM], again not so much a name as a title marking his being at the pinnacle of all things.  Furthermore, when Jacob, struggling with God at the river, asked the angel of God his name, the reply was “Why do you ask after my name?”

Now God was going to present to Moses a Name which, like other ancient names, was meant to be an insight into the essential character of the one who is named.  This name was about to play a very important role in the events of the Exodus.

God said to Moses, “EHYEH ASHER EHYEH.”  This is what you are to say to the Israelites: “EHYEH  has sent me to you.”                                                                                  

God also said to Moses, “Say to the Israelites, “YAHVEH, the God of your fathers – the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob – has sent me to you.”  This is my name forever, the name by which I am to be remembered from generation to generation.”                Exodus 3.14,15

Now the content of the phrase-name EHYEH ASHER EHYEH [to which YAHVEH corresponds] must be seen in the context 1.] that it is given by God as his Name, as an  appellation which is intended to be a mark of his essential character, and 2.] that to the giving of the name God appends the remark that it is his name forever.

The relevance of this name to the progress of the Exodus history must be seen in another context:

God was about to instruct Moses to go, with associates, before Pharaoh and present to him the historical expectations of “YAHVEH”:

“Go, assemble the elders of Israel… The elders of Israel will listen to you.  Then you and the elders are to go to the king of Egypt and say to him, ‘YAHVEH, the God [ELOHIM ] of the Hebrews, has met with us.  Let us take a three-day journey into the desert to offer sacrifices to YAHVEH our ELOHIM.’”  Exodus 3.18

When Pharaoh was ultimately presented with this message, his reply was as follows:

“Who is YAHVEH that I should obey him and let Israel go?  I do not know YAHVEH and I will not let Israel go.”

By Egyptian standards, Pharaoh himself was like a god, and lord over a great nation.  Why should he listen to the God of a clan of slaves?  In the coming sequence of signs and plagues which were presented to Pharaoh, he would learn the deepest significance of the name “YAHVEH.”


For our own understanding we can look into the form of the Hebrew words being used, because there is no simple translation into English of the Name as it was given in Hebrew.

First we note that YAHVEH, loosely translated “he is”, is the third person singular form of EHYEH, in the first person, which loosely translates as “I am.”  God says of himself, “I am” and we say of him, “He is.” They both have as root the Hebrew verb “to be.”  As God refers to himself as “Ehyeh” and we refer to him as “Yahveh,” then we may also conclude that the name of God transcends the form of most names: the vehicle of a given recognizable sound.  Rather the vehicle of his Name is a recognizable verb: past, present, and future being.

Next we consider that ancient Hebrew, unlike modern Hebrew and unlike English or the Romance languages, has only two tenses, and they are not so much statements of time as much as they indicate stages of completion or realization.

The perfect tense is used to communicate action which is complete, as in “He has eaten,” or, “He left.”  The imperfect tense communicates action which is ongoing and not yet completed.  In some cases it is used to denote actions which, it may be assumed, will soon be over, such as “He is leaving,” or, “He is eating.”   We may take the meaning to be “He is and, for a short time, will be eating.”

In other cases the imperfect form of the verb is used to denote actions which are incomplete because they have no foreseeable end, such as “He is and shall be ruling.”  Or “The earth is and will be turning.”  It is also used to denote habitual action, such as “The sun [past, present, and on into the future] {habitually} sets in the West.”

EHYEH is the first person imperfect of the verb “to be”, so it can be translated as

“I am and shall be,” or “I am and shall be being”. 

This explains why some translations translate the word in the present tense, while others translate it in the future tense.  None of them try to enter into the mysteries of the Hebrew verb, I suppose because they would have to do it for the entire text of the Bible.

As God first gives his name to Moses, he says, EHYEH ASHER EHYEH.   ASHER means primarily “that which” and can also mean “where” or “who.”  So we come to the moment of God speaking to Moses and making this statement about himself:

“Ehyeh asher ehyeh:” I am and shall be being that which I am and shall be. [and this is my Name, my essential character, and it will be so not just into the simple future but forever.]

Then he gives Moses a shortened form of this phrase, saying

“Tell the Israelites that Ehyeh [I am and shall be being] has sent you.

If we look at the verb “to be” we see that it commonly expresses meaning on two levels.  It can refer to the possession of an essential nature or it can refer to our act of living out that essential nature. In reference to our possession of our essential nature, we might say “I am unfettered” or “I am free.”  In referring to the action of living out our nature, we might say, “I am present.”  I would be using both levels of meaning in the statement “I am what I am.”  I would be asserting that I am in my actual living that which I am in my essential being, or conversely, that I am in my essential being the same as what I manifest myself to be in my actual living.

These last statements are close to what God is presenting to Moses as his name, EHYEH, but God is speaking in the Hebrew imperfect tense.  Therefore we must augment the meaning to include unlimited continuity into the future:

I am and shall be being actually and historically that which I am, now and for eternity, in my essential nature.

Then, if we consider what we are saying when we say YAHVEH, we interpret it to be

He is and shall be actually and historically that which he is, now and forever, in his essential nature.

God is presenting here his absolute and constant faithfulness to his own being.  He is also presenting to us his commitment to actual space and time and human history.  It was this quality which Jesus exhibited to us on earth, and which God hopes to reveal to us in the unfolding of history and in our lives.

When Moses came before Pharaoh with the demand of YAHVEH that the Hebrew people be released in order to worship Him in the desert, Pharaoh claimed to be ignorant of either the person or the authority of YAHVEH.  Of course, if he was ignorant of the activity of the God of Creation in all of human history, including Creation, then Pharaoh was ignorant of the fact that, as Creator, God is the ground of all being, and that in his faithfulness to his own being God will act faithfully toward his creation and ultimately will not allow anything to take his creation from him.  God’s faithfulness and his commitment to human history are both encoded in his name.  And this means that no matter how much he allows rebellion to have its day, ultimately the rebellion of the world will not be allowed to subvert his plans for his creation.

Moses and company went before Pharaoh and presented him with Yahveh’s demand that his people be released for three days of worship in the desert.  Pharaoh said,

“Who is Yahveh that I should obey him and let Israel go?  I do not know Yahveh and I will not let Israel go.”

In Egypt the pharaoh himself was at the center of popular religion. Old Kingdom pyramid texts [ca. 2780-2250] portray the order of nature and society, in this world and in the next, as aspects of the being of a goddess named Maat.  Pharaoh was considered by his people to be human, but a descendant of the gods.  As such he stood as intermediary between the people and Maat, between chaos and order.

Egyptians believed that the phenomena of nature were divine forces in and of themselves, therefore proper objects of true religion, expected to be of interest to their gods.

At the heart of the order of the universe people looked to the regular activity of cyclical movements in time: the cycle of the sun god Ra through the sky, the Nile and its yearly flood cycle, and the regular succession of kings.

Earth, water, sky, air, underworld, each elemental part had a personified being in a demigod or demigoddess with a name.  In everything, pharaoh was the bridge and the powerful consort of the gods.  He was identified with Horus.  He was seen as the son of Ra.  He was also associated with Osiris, father of Horus and god of death and rebirth.

The Egyptian vision of the divine order, in all aspects, would be challenged by the coming events.

Moses told the Pharaoh that Yahveh demanded that the people be set free to worship him for three days in the desert.  In relaying this message, Moses was suggesting to Pharaoh that the people of Abraham were held by a claim of an order higher than the claim of Egypt’s royal and divinely appointed lord.  This did not set well with Pharaoh. He indignantly began to make life harder for the Hebrews.  They in turn complained to Moses.  Moses immediately returned to God with his own complaint:

“O Yahveh, why have you brought trouble upon this people? Ever since I went to Pharaoh to speak in your name, he has brought trouble upon this people, and you have not rescued your people at all.”  Exodus 5.22,23

Yahveh replied that he was going to act so forcefully in Pharaoh’s world that he would ultimately recognize the person and authority of Yahveh as the the God of all creation, and Pharaoh would willingly end their slavery and even drive them from Egypt:

Then Yahveh said to Moses, “Now you will see what I will do to Pharaoh:  Because of my mighty hand he will let them go; because of my mighty hand he will drive them out of his country.”  God [Elohim] also said to Moses, “I am Yahveh.  I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as God Almighty [El Shaddai] but by my name, Yahveh, I did not make myself known to them. I also established my covenant with them to give them the land of Canaan, where they lived as aliens.  Moreover, I have heard the groaning of the Israelites, whom the Egyptians are enslaving, and I have remembered my covenant.

Therefore say to the Israelites: “I [am] Yahveh, and I will bring you out from under the yoke of the Egyptians.  I will free you from being slaves to them, and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm and with mighty acts of judgment.  I will take you as my own people, and I will be your God [Elohim].  Then you will know that I am Yahveh your Elohim, who brought you out from under the yoke of the Egyptians.  And I will bring you to the land I swore with uplifted hand to give to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob. I will give it to you as a possession.  I am Yahveh.”



I Kings 6.1 places the Exodus at four hundred and eighty years before the foundation of the temple by Solomon.  There is a lot of support for the date of the founding of the temple within a few years of 966 B.C.  This means that the exodus occurred within a few years of 1446 B.C.

According to modern studies in Egyptian chronology, this places the arrival of Joseph in Egyptsomewhere in the 12th Dynasty and positions most of the years of slavery, up to the time of Moses, in the 13th Dynasty.

In the Brooklyn Museumthere is a papyrus scroll numbered 35:1446 which comes from the reign of the 13th Dynasty pharaoh Soberkhotep III, predecessor of Neferhotep I.  It is a decree of that pharaoh detailing a transfer of slaves.  Of the 95 names mentioned in the letter, 50% are Semitic in origin, including such names as Asher, Menahem, and Issachar.[i]

Eusebius, in the 4th c. A.D., records excerpts from the writings of a historian named Artapanus[ii] [3rd c. B.C.], in which it is claimed that Moses’ surrogate mother was a royal daughter named Merris who married Pharaoh Khenephres, also called Soberkhotep IV.  This makes Pharaoh Khenephres the “step father” of Moses.  It also makes Khenephres the pharaoh from whom Moses fled in 1487 B.C. Consequently, forty years later, the royal heir of Khenefres, Thutmose I / Dudimose I, would have been the pharaoh of the exodus.[iii] And Thutmose might have been the “step brother” of Moses.

The Egyptian historian Manetho [ 3rd c. B.C., Ptolemaic] supports the claim that in the reign of Dudimose I [Tutimaios], “a blast of God smote us….” and he tells how Egypt collapsed during his reign….following which the country was overrun by the Hyksos/Amalekites.[iv]

The Ipuwer Papyrus may be a description of the plagues sent through Moses.  It may also describe the land under the Amalekite invasion which came upon the heels of the Exodus. It is a long narrative in the tone of these excerpts:

Plague is throughout the land….Blood is everywhere….The river is blood, yet men drink of it….a foreign tribe from abroad has come to Egypt… the children of princes are dashed against the walls.[v]

Archaeology of the city of Avaris in Goshen reveals extraordinary numbers of infant deaths, which accords with the decree of pharaoh to kill the infant males.  It also reveals a moment of sudden mass burial followed by the abandonment of the site and later visitation by another Asiatic group without knowledge of Egyptian customs.[vi]


The Bible explains that through the hand of Moses God brought into Egypt ten plagues, each an increment in the demonstration that the being of all creation is His domain.

The water of the Nile was turned to blood, whether within the banks of the river or in jars.  An invasion of frogs followed, covering the country and the cities.  Then the dust of Egypt became gnats, and swarms of flies filled the houses and covered the ground.  Pharaoh remained unwilling to release the people from slavery.

A fifth plague brought death to all the livestock ofEgypt, and God demanded of pharaoh through Moses, “Let my people go that they may worship me.”

Yet his heart was unyielding and he would not let the people go.”

Boils broke out on both men and animals.  Hail destroyed every living thing that was not inside shelter, stripping fields and trees except inside Goshen.

Locusts filled the houses and covered the ground, devouring what was left of the vegetation.  Prior to the plague of locusts, pharaoh’s officials had said to him,

“Let the people go so that they may worship their God Yahveh.  Do you not see that Egypt is destroyed?”

After the plague of locusts, Pharaoh summoned Moses and Aaron and said,

“I have sinned against Yahveh your God and against you.  Now forgive my sin once more and pray to Yahveh your God to take this deadly plague away from me.”

But once the locusts were gone, his stubbornness returned.  Then a total darkness “that could be felt” came over all of Egypt for three days.  This was a complete refutation of the pretension to worship Ra and a direct rebuke to Pharaoh, the “son” of Ra.  Now pharaoh vowed to Moses that he would destroy him if he ever saw him again.

Pharaoh knew that divine power was real in the world.  But he pursued a worship of demigods as it was served up to him by the conventional wisdom, cultivated their honor in ways that pleased the imagination of Egyptian society.  As we see in the present time, the urgency to bestow Tolerance liberally and equally on a world of diverse gods, leads to a condition in which all things are made equally without value.  For pharaoh it was imperative that all the people should know themselves to be without difference from other men.

But Yahveh was expressly interested in demonstrating that his people were called out from the world of rebellion, therefore under restraints greater than those placed upon other men.

And so there came one final plague, the death of the first-born children of the houses ofEgypt.  It was not a simple division along racial lines.  It was the promise of death to all the land, except for those houses marked with a sign of God’s mercy: the blood of sacrifice.  And on this night when so many would die, Jesus, the Lamb slain since the foundation of the world, was encoding into history his promise to die for mankind.

Moses carried the message to the people:

“This is what Yahveh says: ‘About midnight I will go throughout Egypt.  Every firstborn son in Egypt will die, from the firstborn son of Pharaoh who sits on the throne, to the firstborn son of the slave girl, who is behind the mill, and all the firstborn of the cattle as well.

…Each man is to take a lamb for his family, one for each household…The animals you choose must be year old males without defect, and you may take them from the sheep or the goats…and all the people of the community of Israel must slaughter them at twilight.  Then they are to take some of the blood and put it on the sides and tops of the doorframes of the houses where they eat the lambs.  That same night they are to eat the meat roasted over the fire, along with bitter herbs and bread made without yeast….  Eat it in haste. It is the Passover of Yahveh….On this same night I will pass through Egypt and strike down every firstborn—both men and animals—and will bring judgment on all the gods of Egypt.  I am Yahveh.  The blood will be a sign for you on the houses where you are; and when I see the blood, I will pass over you.  No destructive plague will touch you when I strike Egypt….

Pharaoh discovered in heartbreak the truth of the name of Yahveh.  Through faith and obedience, Moses guided his people a little farther, to the discovery of the mercy of God.  Tonight we celebrate the Lamb slain since the foundation of the world, who keeps us for himself, and who makes it possible to place ourselves before God.


[i]  “Before Moses, the Bible records that the Israelites were enslaved by their Egyptian hosts (Exodus 1:8-14). In the Brooklyn Museum resides a papyrus scroll numbered Brooklyn 35:1446 which was acquired in the late 19th century by Charles Wilbour. This dates to the reign of Sobekhotep III, the predecessor of Neferhotep I and so the pharaoh who reigned one generation before Moses. This papyrus is a decree by the pharaoh for a transfer of slaves. Of the 95 names of slaves mentioned in the letter, 50% are Semitic in origin. What is more, it lists the names of these slaves in the original Semitic language and then adds the Egyptian name that each had been assigned, which is something the Bible records the Egyptians as doing, cf. Joseph’s name given to him by pharaoh (Genesis 41:45). Some of the Semitic names are biblical and include:

[ii]  Clemens’ Stromata summarizes the writings of Artapanus, a Jewish historian who wrote Peri Iodaion (About the Jews). Artapanus is named by Eusebius in his Evangelicae Preparationis and his detailed account of the life of Moses is reported in his Pamphilis, Book 9, Ch. 27, 1-37.

[iii]  “Artapanus writes that a pharaoh named Palmanothes was persecuting the Israelites. His daughter Merris adopted a Hebrew child who grew up to be called prince Mousos. Merris married a pharaoh Khenephrês. Prince Mousos grew up to administer the land on behalf of this pharaoh. He led a military campaign against the Ethiopians who were invading Egypt; however, upon his return, Khenephrês grew jealous of his popularity. Mousos then fled to Arabia to return when Khenephrês died and lead the Israelites to freedom.”
– John Fulton, “A New Chronology – Synopsis of David Rohl’s book ‘A Test of Time’

[iv]  “Tutimaos [the pharaoh Dudimose, one of the later rulers of the 13th Dynasty]. In his reign, for what cause I know not, a blast of God smote us; and unexpectedly, from the regions of the East, invaders of obscure race marched in confidence of victory against our land. By main force they easily seized it without striking a blow; and having overpowered the rulers of the land, they then burned our cities ruthless, razed to the ground the temples of the gods, and treated all the natives with a cruel hostility, massacring some and leading into slavery the wives and children of others. Finally, they appointed as king one of their number who name was Salitis…”
– Josephus, quoting Manetho in Against Apion, Book1:14

[v] Ipuwer Papyrus, Papyrus Leiden  334, a hard to date papyrus copied by 19th Dynasty scribes.

[vi]  “The only period in Egyptian history with incontrovertible archaeological evidence for a large Asiatic population in the eastern delta (i.e. Goshen/Kessan) is the Second Intermediate Period…”
“The Israelite Sojourn inEgypt began in the late 12th Dynasty and continued throughout most of the 13th Dynasty. It is represented inEgypt’s archaeological record by the Asiatic culture known as Middle Bronze IIA. The main settlement of the Israelites in Egypt was located at the city of Avaris in the region of Goshen. Their archaeological remains are represented by the dwellings and tombs of Tell ed-Daba stata H to G/1.”

“…An analysis of the graves at Tell ed-Daba has shown that there were more females than males in the burial population of Avaris.”
In addition, “sixty-five per cent of all the burials were those of children under the age of eighteen months. Based on modern statistical evidence obtained from pre-modern societies we would expect the infant mortality rate to be around twenty to thirty percent.”
– David M. Rohl, A Test of Time: The Bible from Myth to History (1995), p. 273, 277, 271

“At the end of stratum G/1 at Tell ed-Daba, which is roughly dated to the middle of the 13th Dynasty, Bietak and his archaeological team began to uncover a gruesome scene. All over the city of Avaristhey found shallow burial pits into which the victims of some terrible disaster had been hurriedly cast. There were no careful interments of the deceased. The bodies were not arranged in the proper burial fashion but rather thrown into the mass graves, one on top of the other. There were no grave goods placed with the corpses as was usually the custom.”
“…Analysis of the site archaeology suggests that a large part of the remaining population of the town abandoned their homes and departed from Avaris en masse. The site was then reoccupied after an interval of unknown duration by Asiatics who were not ‘Egyptianised’ like the previous population of stratum G.”
– David M. Rohl, A Test of Time: The Bible from Myth to History (1995), p. 279

The City of God, the City of the World, and the Great Deception


, , , , ,

There is a river whose streams make glad the city of God,  the holy place where the Most High dwells.  God is within her, she will not fall; God will help her at break of day.  Nations are in uproar, kingdoms fall; he lifts his voice, the earth melts…. Be still and know that I am God; I will be exalted among the nations, I will be exalted in the earth.  Yahveh Almighty is with us; the God of Jacob is our fortress.                                                                              Psalm 46.4-6,10,11

Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain?  The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against Yahveh and against his Anointed One.  “Let us break their chains,” they say, “and throw off their fetters.”  The One enthroned in heaven laughs; the Lord scoffs at them.  Then he rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying, “I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill.”

I will proclaim the decree of Yahveh: He said to me, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father.  Ask of me, and I will make the nations your inheritance,  the ends of the earth your possession.                                                       Psalm 2.1-8


Mourning and Resistance

At the heart of modern political and religious life there lies a deception.  Its integration into society has been thorough.  Time has facilitated its acceptance within the cultural landscape.  Criticism of it is only occasional and subdued.  Those who call it into the open are rebuffed, greeted with distrust and irritation.

The great deception is the inversion of a great truth neglected by those who were meant to be its guardians.  Those who have established the deception, falsely usurping claims and titles, are perhaps less culpable than those who, over the centuries, held the truth in their hand but let it fall.  It is an essential part of the climax of the era that this truth will be restored and brought into the consciousness of the world.  It is our obligation to stand in affirmation of it.

Today it is difficult to take stock of the deception or find the platform from which to address it.  Politics has ingested it.  The general discussion has made a home for it.    Even the dialogues of religion, liberal and conservative, have adopted it. The very use of words has become confused.

The prevailing powers have learned that if a tale is spread thoroughly, there is little likelihood of meaningful opposition.  In the shadow of this tale other deceptions follow: the attacks of 9/11 enhanced by a claim that they were perpetrated by Arab terrorists, the attack on Afghanistan “to rout Al Qaeda,” the attack on Iraq“to seize their weapons of mass destruction,” and now the attack on Libya“because Qaddafi fired on his people.”

Where do we find the perspective from which to assess the truth of these events?  Not from within the government itself.

What about the press? They have the capacity and the duty to examine events.  They fought for the truth during the war in Vietnam and the struggle for civil rights.  But when they revealed their capacity to shake up the status quo they alerted the powers to edit their liberties.  Now it seems that only those with proven loyalties are allowed to bring us news from critical theaters of action.

There is broad impetus to self-censorship.  The new “enemy of the state” has no address.  The enemy could be any one and any where.  President Bush made it clear, “If you are not with us, you are against us.”  That warning leaves no room for critical thought or skepticism.  No one wants to share skepticism only to be branded an enemy of society.  People are careful of what they say.  Rules have changed with regard to who may be investigated and who may be detained.  Meanwhile, a sanitized media enables us in the distasteful comfort that the wounds of our victims are far from our consciousness.

What about our religious leaders?  During the sixties and seventies they were vocal participants in the civil rights movement and in the protest against the war, often suffering beatings and imprisonment.  Now we rarely hear them speak.  About what?  How many will even recognize that there are issues?  Our sensitivities have gone dead.  There is no leadership coming from church or synagogue.  The religious establishment is mute.

What remains is the ache of the Palestinian  people imprisoned behind thirty foot walls; the plea of a Rachel Corrie; the witness of the thousands of Afghan women who immolate themselves every year because war, drugs, corruption, and bad laws have made their lives unlivable; the deafening silence of a million souls murdered in Iraq since the beginning of the war, souls which cry out to God.  And, with regard to 9/11, we have the unrecognized voices of isolated scientists, those who measure with precision the extent of the lies disseminated by our government.

Niels Harrit and a group of Danish scientists analyzed debris and found that theWorldTradeCenter’s twin towers and Building #7 were brought down with the help of tons of thermite explosives.  He said of the quandary posed by his discoveries, “You can either speak out or you can live in shame.”

Is there a global conspiracy?  We must weigh the modern  import of the words in the second Psalm:

The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against Yahveh    and against his Anointed One.


The dream of the transcendent society 

The great deception subtly distorts the common vision of the central pillar of human history and aspires to usurp for the deceivers a destiny which by right belongs not to a center of national power but to the devoted adherents of all nations.

The idea of human history as the development and maturing of the human person and his social instincts through the course of time has been dominated by the notion of National history, and that is now being translated into the narrative of inevitable Globalism.  The conversation about the intersection of the goals of God and man in history, culturally entertained for centuries, is a mystery unrecognized in the present time.  We find a sense of that great goal remembered, however, in the hymn “Jerusalem” based on a poem of William Blake, a hymn which ranks perhaps as England’s most popular patriotic song:

And did those feet in ancient time
Walk upon England’s mountains green:
And was the holy Lamb of God,
On England’s pleasant pastures seen!

And did the Countenance Divine,
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here,
Among these dark Satanic Mills?

Bring me my Bow of burning gold;
Bring me my Arrows of desire:
Bring me my Spear: O clouds unfold!
Bring me my Chariot of fire!

I will not cease from Mental Fight,
Nor shall my Sword sleep in my hand:
Till we have built Jerusalem,
In England’s green & pleasant Land. 

That ancient goal of history is nothing less than the realization on earth of the kingdom of heaven.  I quote this old hymn as witness to the fact that historically it has been close to the heart of Western culture for people to know themselves as the people of God and to hope to realize the society of God.  These verses from Blake ostensibly aspire to see an end to the “Satanic Mills” of industrialization and hail Jerusalem as metaphor for an England restored to a more pastoral divine standard.  More extravagantly, the hymn is also popular among the proponents of “English Israel”, those who consider England to be genetically rooted in the lost tribes of Israel, therefore touting a hope to see the people and perhaps the throne of God established on English soil.

Generally in the Western world it has been held that the nations of the earth are mundane and that the true society of God is without connection to the governments of nations but rather founded in the extended transcendent society of those who hold faith in the God of Israel.  For evidence of this we go to the hymn of another great Englishman, John Newton:

Glorious things of thee are spoken,
Zion, city of our God!
He, whose word cannot be broken,
Form’d thee for His own abode:
On the Rock of ages founded,
What can shake thy sure repose?
With salvation’s walls surrounded,
Thou may’st smile at all thy foes.

See! the streams of living waters,
   Springing from eternal love,
Well supply thy sons and daughters,
   And all fear of want remove.
Who can faint when such a river
   Ever flows their thirst to assuage?
Grace, which, like the Lord, the giver,
   Never fails from age to age.

Round each habitation hov’ring,
   See the cloud and fire appear!
For a glory and a cov’ring,
   Showing that the Lord is near;
Thus deriving, from their banner,
   Light by night, and shade by day:
Safe they feed upon the manna
   Which He gives them when they pray.

Bless’d inhabitants of Zion,
   Wash’d in the Redeemer’s blood!
Jesus, whom their souls rely on,
   Makes them kings and priests to God.
‘Tis His love His people raises
   Over self to reign as kings,
And as priests, His solemn praises
   Each for a thank-off’ring brings.

Saviour, if of Zion’s city
   I through grace a member am,
Let the world deride or pity,
   I will glory in Thy name:
Fading is the worldling’s pleasure,
   All his boasted pomp and show:
Solid joys and lasting treasure,
  None but Zion’s children know.

Here the river which flows through the city ofGod is not the Thames but the Holy Spirit nourishing the souls of those who love God.  The inhabitants of Zion are from all nations, a transcendent society of people who are “washed in the Redeemer’s blood.”  At the end the sharpest difference is drawn between the “worldling” and “Zion’s children.”

Two centuries ago John Newton could speak of Zion without overtones of Zionism, the twentieth century secular movement to establish a homeland for Jews without any specific concern for religious factions or their hopes to realize an Israel of God under the rule of God in the person of his Messiah.

Quite unlike the modern Zionist, John Newton was a Zionist in the ancient tradition beginning with Abraham and Moses: he believed that Zion is the present society of those who give their lives to the God of Zion, and the ultimate domain of that people in the land of promise.  He, a former slave trader, had given his own life to Yahveh, the God of Israel, and to the Messiah of Zion who is Yeshua/Jesus our king.


Heirs of the promises to Abraham… 

The great deception features a slight of hand whereby self-proclaimed representatives of a genetic group insinuate themselves as the unique people of God, thereby claiming to be genetically exclusive heirs to the heart of human history. 

By way of preface it must be affirmed that the God of history acts in history in finite moments and in dealings with real people, prominent among them the historic figure Abraham.  Finding in the spirit of Abraham a unique ground of faith, God promised that he would make him a father of nations, promised that he would bring blessing to his descendants, assured him that out of his descendants would come blessing for all mankind, and even promised the territoryof Canaan as an everlasting possession to him and his seed.[1]

Later, when the descendants of Abraham’s grandson, Jacob, had become a million strong and were called before God at Mt.Sinai, there to bind themselves by covenant to God, the second commandment of the covenant included the clause that God held for himself the liberty to bless a thousand generations of those who love him and keep his commandments.  It was in this vein that God swore that, if for no other reason than the devotion of the patriarchs, he would never forget the descendants of Jacob.  Throughout the Hebrew Scriptures God asserts that in the end, no matter how much genetic Israel strays from him, there will be a remnant that is able to find him and to know him.[2]

This means that the God of Creation has a special relationship with the children of those people to whom he revealed himself, the people from whom has been born the Messiah of Israel, the Messiah who is the world’s ultimate blessing from the root of Abraham…..

But what is the extent of the genetic prerogative?

At the heart of the modern dilemma consuming the Abrahamic religions and the nations of the world lies the stance taken by the Zionists that they, along purely genetic lines, own the claim to the promises of God to Abraham. 

However, in the very Hebrew Scriptures which make record of God’s promises to Abraham, the recorded history of God’s dealings with the descendants of Abraham reveals that God did not simply sign a quit deed to Abraham and to every descendant who  claims a genetic bond.  The actual history reveals that, just as God intends Israel to be “not one of the nations,” so the land itself is not a normal piece of land.

First, although all the world belongs to God, he has declared his own elaborate vision of the territory of promise: that it is uniquely his own.  God said to Moses on Mt.Sinai:

The land must not be sold permanently, because the land is mine and you are but aliens and my tenants.”                                                                    Leviticus 25.23

In lieu of which, in the next phrase God speaks of “the country that you hold as a possession.”

Second, no accession to this territory has received God’s blessing except as it came explicitly from the hand of God.  In case of point, at first reconnaissance, the people of the Exodus resisted God’s plan for them to move on into the land of promise.   God’s response was to command them to remain forty years in the desert until the next generation was ready to act in faith.  Immediately, without sanction of God or Moses, a large contingent set out to disregard this restriction and wage a campaign of war for the territory of Canaan.  They were swiftly defeated by the armies of the outlying regions.

Abraham himself never tried to conquer land inCanaan, even though it had been promised to him for eternity.  He lived in tents at peace with his neighbors, even making treaties of friendship with local lords.  He, among the few, knew that man’s life is eternal, and that the fulfillment of the promise is to come “in the fullness of time,” and only by the hand of God.

Third, God meticulously gave Moses rules by which to regulate the use of the land, and he has always had the highest expectations of people’s conduct upon the land.  On Mt. Sinai he warned Moses that if people disobeyed his covenant and abused the land, he would chase them from it:

“If in spite of this you still do not listen to me…, then in my anger…I will turn your cities into ruins and lay waste your sanctuaries…I will lay waste the land,… I will scatter you among the nations…Your land will be laid waste and your cities will lie in ruins…Those of you who are left will waste away in the lands of their enemies because of their sins; also because of their fathers’ sins they will waste away.  But if they will confess their sins and the sins of their fathers…then when their uncircumcised hearts are humbled and they pay for their sin, I will remember my covenant with Jacob….and with Abraham, and I will remember the land.”                                                   Leviticus 26.27-42, excerpts

Fourth, the promise of the land is not a mere reward of real estate.  The land is the substrate or ground of the greatest promise of history: the rule of God in unity with and in the presence of his human creation.  This piece of land, so battered and arid and contested, is the precious earnest payment toward the coming realization of the kingdom of God in full-fleshed reality on this earth.  That which today is a living transcendent kingdom will someday find its water and its dirt and its stone in the territory of promise.  The land is inseparable from the great historic promise.

There is nothing in Scripture which is so cynical as to promise unconditional access to God or unconditional participation in the people of God apart from the submission of the heart to God.  If God favors genetic Israel it is in bringing to them both blessing and chastisement in order to lead them to the threshold of the universal truth of his being.  No one occupies the ultimate promise of God short of crossing that threshold.  As Paul wrote in his letter to the Romans:

He is no Jew who is merely a Jew outwardly, nor is circumcision  something outward in the flesh; he is a Jew who is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, spiritual not literal – praised by God, not by man.    Romans 2.29


The Great Deception: The City of the World Goes in Masquerade as the City of God 

The great deception sits enshrined in the allowances made by the governments of the world and by the religions of the world such that they recognize national Israel as the Israel of blessing, as heir to the promises of God to Abraham, even though the modern Israeli government is the purely secular fabrication of a group of genetic descendants, without regard for historic covenant or Torah or faith or Messiah.

 Two essential truths measure the falsehood of this deception:

Truth Number One:  The Israel of blessing, heir to the promises of Abraham, can only be a people in covenant relationship [i.e. bound by oath] with the God of Israel, who alone is the source of their blessing.  Just prior to the first sojourn of the children of Yahveh into the land of promise, Moses confirmed in these words the covenant which, since the formative event at Mt. Sinai, had bound the people to their God:

“You are standing here in order to enter into a covenant with Yahveh your God, a covenant Yahveh is making with you this day and sealing with an oath, to confirm you this day as his people, that he may be your God as he promised you and as he swore to your fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob….  Make sure there is no man or woman, clan or tribe among you today whose heart turns away from Yahveh our God to go and worship the gods of those nations….  When such a person hears the words of this oath, he invokes a blessing on himself and therefore thinks, ‘I will be safe even though I persist in going my own way.’  This will bring disaster….  Yahveh will never be willing to forgive him…and Yahveh shall separate him unto evil out of all the tribes of Israel, according to all the curses of the covenant that is written in this book of the law.                   Deuteronomy 29.

In other words, apart from individual submission to the God of Israel,[3] there is no participation in Israel.

Furthermore, the faithful of Israel have always, since the day of Abraham, lived in anticipation of the coming Messiah.  The need for our Messiah, “the Lamb slain from the beginning of the world,” is built into the fabric of transcendent Israel as into the fabric of a sinful world, such that it was part of God’s plan for his people that through the Messiah he would transport them beyond the bounds of the Sinai covenant, as witnessed by Jeremiah:

“The time is coming,” declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their forefathers when I took them by the hand To lead them out of Egypt, Because they broke my covenant, though I was a husband to them,” declares Yahveh. “This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time,” declares Yahveh.  “I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts.  I will be their God, and they will be my people.”         Jeremiah 31.31-33

 We know that from the time that the Holy Spirit came to the first body of believers at Pentecost, the presence of the Spirit of God in the hearts of men has been the seal of their faith and the hallmark of the New Covenant.  As Peter said at the time,

“This is what was spoken of by the prophet Joel: ‘In the last days, God says, I will pour out my Spirit on all people…and everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”                                                                  Acts 2.16,17,21

There is an essential historical fact which most of the world fails to reckon: The Messiah of Israel has come, and through him that new covenant “with the house of Israel.”  This is the most significant refinement to the nature of transcendent Israel.  Now, in this time, God’s covenant with his people has been sealed through the blood of their king upon a cross, and those who enter into that covenant are not defined by their genetics but by their sharing in the faith of Abraham, by the nature of their spiritual gesture to put aside their own will and seek the presence of the Spirit of God in their lives.[4]

In the celebration with his disciples of that Passover, for which he himself would be the Paschal lamb, Jesus raised the symbolic cup of wine before them and said,

“This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you.”                                                                                       Luke 22.20 

In other words, apart from the Messiah of Israel, there is no transcendent Israel.

Truth Number TwoThe enjoyment of the land of promise by the people of God is not ours to claim as our own in this time, nor is it ours to achieve by our own hand.  It is the work of our Messiah, in his time, upon his return, to establish us in Zion, as was clearly understood by Abraham himself:

It was by faith that he [Abraham] sojourned in the promised land, as in a foreign country, residing in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob who were co-heirs with him of  the same promise; he was waiting for the City with its fixed foundations, whose         builder and maker is God….These all died in faith without obtaining the promises; they only saw them far away and hailed them, owning that they were ‘strangers and exiles upon earth.’…That is why God is not ashamed to be called their God; he has prepared a City for them.                                                                 Hebrews 11.9,10,13,16

The Zion of this moment, the Zion in which John Newton and all other children of God rejoice, is the transcendent kingdom of God, lived out in present time and in direct communion with our king, who, by his Spirit, rules within our lives and within history.



The Usurpers of the Name “Israel” and Their Enablers…

The state of Israel, a recently fabricated political entity, assumes the stance of heir to the Promise, pretends to represent the people of Promise, violently lays claim to the land of Promise, and then receives the acknowledgement and honor of the nations of the earth, most particularly the honor of theUnited States, as in this speech by President Clinton before the Israeli Knesset on October 27, 1994:

“’If you abandon Israel, God will never forgive you’…it is God’s will that Israel, the biblical home of the people of Israel, continue for ever and ever….Your journey is our journey, and America will stand with you now and always.”

All American presidents recite similar oaths of unshakable fealty to secular, Zionist, genetically- defined Israel.  Anyone at all concerned with the opinion of Scripture on this subject will be familiar with John the Baptist.  His credentials are secure.  John the Baptist is famous for having great difficulty with the idea of a genetically defined Israel:

“Produce fruit in keeping with repentance.  And do not think you can say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’  I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham…. I baptize you with water for repentance.  But after me will come one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry.  He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.”[5]

We find a very similar attitude toward the idea of a secular, nation-state Israel among many devout Jews in the present time.  Great numbers of Jews object to the hold of the Zionists upon the land of promise.  Neturei Karta [meaning “guardians of the city”] is a group of orthodox Jews which numbers itself in the thousands, representing hundreds of thousands of Jews who want the Zionists out of Palestine.  They claim that Judaism and Zionism are mutually contradictory visions of history and of the land of promise.  Members of Neturei Karta hold that diaspora Israel has no right to collect itself as a nation apart from its Messiah.  They hold that there can be no sovereignty of Israel apart from the Lordship of the God of Israel.  They recognize that the promise of God to Abraham is a promise to the transcendent Israel of faith and obedience.

Conversely, while most of the synagogues in this country would claim to seek first a transcendent Israel, virtually all have signs in the front of their sanctuaries with the Israeli flag and the claim “We stand with Israel,” meaning of course the current Israeli government, regardless of its policies.

As for the church in this country, the majority have no belief at all in the divinity of Jesus or in the unique import of the God of Israel.  The broader liberal church, in the name of Tolerance, will not tolerate any in-historical specificity in God which might in and of itself render the worship of other gods nonsensical.  The Catholic church, along with the liberal church, is in service to the broad “ecumenical” agenda of the United Nations and the Temple of Understanding.

The minority in the hierarchical church, the conservatives, who do claim faith in the God of Israel and belief in the divinity of Jesus, have mostly fallen under the spell of an ideology called premillennial dispensationalism, developed by an Irish Anglican priest, Nelson Darby, during the first half of the nineteenth century and fostered through the course of the last century by Americans such as the Chicagoans D.L. Moody and Harry Ironside, as well as by C.I. Scofield and his Scofield Bible, a popular text with ample notes interpreting all passages in terms of this theology.

In the process of perniciously ignoring the incredible unity in the work of God over millennia, these ideologues have divided the era into diverse “dispensations”, in each of which God deals with man differently.  In the process they have justified, to their thinking, a separate divine destiny for Jew and gentile, i.e. for “literal” Israel and “literal” church, most interesting being a rapture [sudden transferal into the heavens] of the gentile church just as the end time war of good and evil has need of martyrs, and, concomitantly, at that same moment the “Jews” [defined genetically] get to have free reign over the land of promise without the meddling of those [now raptured] troublesome gentiles.  In granting divine blessing on the moribund entity, “genetic/nation-state Israel” the dispensationalists create precedent for bestowing authenticity on another moribund and spiritless institution, the hierarchical and official “church.”

The dispensationalists are only making repairs on the exclusionary edifice erected by the emperor Constantine in the fourth century. Constantine, carving the foundation of the next thousand years of Catholicism, did his best to despise all things Jewish and to isolate the being and the message and the Messianic mission of Jesus from both the transcendent and the historical nation, Israel, from its centuries of hope and from its careful cultivation of the messianic expectation.  This is certainly the dark beginning of the Western world’s loss of understanding that Jesus is in fact king upon the historic throne of David. 

Constantine did his best to take the most important event in Jewish history and turn it into a gentile mythology.  At the hand of Constantine and his new hierarchical Roman church, this was nothing less than a cynical rejection of the historic roots of the kingdom of God on earth.

Theodoret’s Ecclesiastical History records The Epistle of the Emperor          Constantine, concerning the matters transacted at the Council [of Nicea],             addressed to those Bishops who were not present:

“It was, in the first place, declared improper to follow the custom of the Jews in    the celebration of this holy festival[6], because, their hands having been stained    with crime, the minds of these wretched men are necessarily blinded. … Let us,       then, have nothing in common with the Jews, who are our adversaries. … Let us …studiously avoid all contact with that evil way. … For how can they entertain   right views on any point who, after having compassed the death of the Lord, being  out of their minds, are guided not by sound reason, but by an unrestrained passion,  wherever their innate madness carries them. … lest your pure minds should appear to share in the customs of a people so utterly depraved. … Therefore, this  irregularity must be corrected, in order that we may no more have any thing in common with those parricides and the murderers of our Lord … no single point in common with the perjury of the Jews.”

With such a beginning, it should be no surprise that the church goes along in confused ignorance of its roots.  Now the hierarchical church, having given away the mantel and the responsibility and the honor and the throne and the titles of Israel, has become the enabler of the Zionists who take to themselves all that was promised to a people historically created to be “not one of the nations.”  The Zionists now cash in on it all, in order to become “one of the nations.”… even at the forefront of nations.

Premillennial dispensationalism is the natural mother of a movement known as Christian Zionism.  Premillennial dispensationalism is the ideological core of the conservative religious movement in this country as it supports the nation’s political right in its own service to the ambitions of secular Zionist Israel.[7]

The dispensationalists make the claim that Jesus came as a “candidate” for kingship and, having been rejected by “the Jews,” returned to heaven with his goal of kingship disappointed, until a later time.

In reality, Yeshua,  the long-awaited heir to the throne of David, fully king over transcendent and eternal Israel, went triumphantly to the cross, bearing in his body the shame of the sin of mankind, there to win redemption for his subjects while conquering forever the power of death over them.  As a result he is securely on the throne of heaven, the historic seat of power over those in Israel who love and obey him.


The throne of David and the heir of promise

Jacob spoke prophetically of the line of his son Judah, that from him would come the king who would have a royal claim over the people of all nations:

“The scepter will not depart from Judah nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet,      until he comes to whom it belongs and the obedience of the nations is his.”[8]

 Balaam spoke prophetically to Moses of the future appearance of this king:

 “I see him, but not now, I behold him, but not near. A star will come out of Jacob,       a scepter will rise out of Israel.”[9]

 God spoke prophetically to King David through Nathan, speaking of a single eternal king to come in the line ofJudah, from the house of David:

 “…Yahveh will build a house for you: When your days are over and you go to be with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring to succeed you, one of your own sons, and I will establish his kingdom….I will establish his throne forever.  I will be his father and he will be my son.  I will never take my love away from him, …I will set him over my house and my kingdom forever; his throne will be established forever.”                    I Chronicles 17.10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Psalm 89 calls for the immortal heir and eternal king in the line of David:

…”I have made a covenant with my chosen one, I have sworn to David my servant,     ‘I will establish your line forever and make your throne firm through all generations.’…  I will establish his line forever, his throne as long as the heavens endure.”                                                                                         Psalm 89.3,4,29

 Isaiah promised the immortal and eternal king who would reign on David’s throne, a king who would come as healer, savior, Prince of Peace, and Mighty God:

The people walking in darkness have seen a great light…For to us a child is born,…        and the government will be on his shoulders.  And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.  Of the increase of his government and peace  there will be no end.  He will reign on David’s throne          and over his kingdom, establishing and upholding it with justice and righteousness   from that time on and forever.  The zeal of the Lord Almighty  will accomplish this.”                                                                          Isaiah 9.2,6,7 

So spoke also Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Amos, Zechariah, and many others. 


 The throne of David… the expectation of in-historical fulfillment

 In spite of the desire of many to see the kingship of the Messiah be realized at the end of history, we see clearly in Psalm 2 and in Daniel 2 that by prophesy it is in the time of the kings of earth and in the midst of their struggle for dominion that the Messiah is, as established fact, seated on the throne of power over transcendent Zion, building and sustaining the kingdom which shall, over all others, retain the favor of God.  The witness of the Psalm is as follows:

The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against Yahveh    and against his Anointed One…the Lord scoffs at them.  Then he rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying, “I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill.”

Equally in the book of Daniel, in the 5th century B.C., Daniel, standing before Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, by inspiration told the king the content of a great dream and interpreted to him its significance, regarding the appearing of the Lord of history and the kingdom of promise:

“…This was the dream and now we will interpret it to the king. …The God of heaven has given you [Nebuchadnezzar] dominion…After you another kingdom will rise…Next a third kingdom, one of bronze, will rule over the whole earth.  Finally, there will be a fourth kingdom….In the time of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people.  It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever.”                                                                                                  Daniel 2.36, 37, 39, 40, 44



The throne of David…the pattern of ascendancy

Because of his disobedience before God, Saul had the throne of Israel taken from him.  Without ceremony, God informed Saul, through the prophet Samuel, that his right to power was taken from him:

But Samuel said to him, “…You have rejected the word of Yahveh and Yahveh has rejected you as king over Israel….Yahveh has torn the kingdom of Israel from you today and has given it to one of your neighbors – to one better than you.  He who is the glory of Israel does not lie or change his mind; for he is not a man that he should change his mind.                                                          I Samuel 15.26,28,29

Without delay God sent Samuel to the house of Jesse to choose a king from among his sons and to anoint him king.

Then Yahveh said, “Rise and anoint him; he is the one.”  So Samuel took the horn of oil and anointed him in the presence of his brothers, and from that day on the Spirit of the Lord came upon David in power.                      I Samuel 16.12,13

In obedience to God Samuel poured the anointing oil on the head of David, the youngest son, by which he was marked as devoted to the throne ofIsrael.  From that moment the right to royal power was in his hand.  David had become the Anointed of God, the Messiah.  But he did not immediately seize power: he waited for Yahveh to establish authority and dominion by his own hand.

When Yeshua came to earth, as John the Baptist anointed his head with the water of baptism, the Spirit of God fell upon Yeshua, and God spoke aloud from heaven words like those spoken into the heart of Samuel:

At that moment heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting on him. And a voice from heaven said, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.”                                  Matthew 3.16,17

These conjoined phrases are a double allusion to a pair of Messianic prophecies.  As God spoke the phrase “This is my son” he was calling out and marking the messianic fulfillment of the prophetic line in Psalm 2.7 given above,

“He said to me, ‘You are my son’.”  Today I have become your Father.  Ask of me,    and I will make the nations your inheritance…”

As God spoke the remaining phrase, “with him I am well pleased,” he was marking the messianic fulfillment of the prophetic lines of Isaiah 42.1.  [Note also that this moment of “putting my Spirit on him” is the mark of his entry into power]:

Here is my servant, whom I uphold, my chosen one in whom I delight;            I will put my Spirit on him and he will bring justice to the nations.”

These two phrases, here quoted from Matthew, are the words spoken by God during the first outward anointing of Yeshua.  These words could not be spoken by God to anyone other than the Messiah of Israel.  Yeshua did not move aggressively to seize dominion over the nation state and free them from the Romans, but rather remained focused on the first ambition of his power, which was to go to the cross and stand in for the sins of his people, freeing them from the curse of death.

Without throne or other royal paraphernalia, David received a second anointing in the presence of the elders of Israel in the desert town of Hebron, while Jerusalem was still a Jebusite city, before David moved to capture the fortress ofZion.  This anointing functioned as public confirmation of the initial anointing and was coupled with a covenant between ruler and people.

When all the elders of Israel had come to King David at Hebron, the king made a compact with them at Hebron before Yahveh, and they anointed David king over Israel.                                                                                     II Samuel 5.3  

Soon after the anointing of baptism by John the Baptist and the anointing of the Holy Spirit at the hand of the Father, Jesus, in the presence of disciples, received confirmation of his anointing from the depths of the patriarchal past and from the Father in the heavens.  This confirmation was given again from heaven using the very same words spoken when he was anointed with the Holy Spirit.  The timing of the event of confirmation is measured by Matthew as six days from the day when Jesus asked his disciples, “Who do you say I am?” and Peter replied, “You are the Messiah [the one anointed to be king], the Son of the living God.”

After six days Jesus took with him Peter, James and John the brother of James, and led them up a high mountain by themselves.  There he was transfigured before them.  His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light.  Just then there appeared before them Moses and Elijah, talking with Jesus….A bright cloud enveloped them and a voice from the cloud said, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.  Listen to him!”                                              Matthew 17.1-3, 5

 It could not be more clear that God himself has twice proclaimed Yeshua to be the long awaited king over Israel.



The throne of David… the ascendancy of the one to whom it belongs

Jesus sealed his covenant with his people in the events of Passover, 30 A.D.  He did so by becoming the Passover lamb of expectation, shedding his blood for his people, standing in for them before God to claim them for himself.  Yeshua’s claim of Lordship, the highest possible claim to his people, was sealed at the cross.

In the hours before this great act of love he entered Jerusalem upon a donkey, the long prophesied gesture of the messianic king coming in peace.  He was greeted openly by the people of Jerusalem as king.  He went to the cross as king of his covenant people, Israel.

As they approached Jerusalem and came to Bethphage on the Mount of Olives, Jesus sent two disciples, saying to them, “Go to the village ahead of you, and at once you will find a donkey tied there, with her colt by her.  Untie them and bring them to me. If anyone says anything to you, tell him that the Lord needs them, and he will send them right away.”

 This took place to fulfill what was spoken through the prophet: [Zecharaiah]

“Say to the Daughter of Zion, ‘See, your king comes to you, gentle and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.’” 

The disciples went and did as Jesus had instructed them.  They brought the donkey and the colt, placed their cloaks on them, and Jesus sat on them.  A very large crowd spread their cloaks on the road, while others cut branches from the trees and spread them on the road. The crowds that went ahead of him and those that followed shouted,

 Hosanna to the Son of David!”                                                    Matthew 21.1-9

 …the whole crowd of disciples began joyfully to praise God in loud voices…:  “Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord.”  …Some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to Jesus, “Teacher, rebuke your disciples.”  “I tell you,” he replied, “if they keep quiet, the stones will cry out.”                                              Luke 19.38-40

…the great crowd that had come for the [Passover] Feast heard that Jesus was on his way to Jerusalem.  They took palm branches and went out to meet him, shouting,  

“Blessed is the King of Israel!”                                                     John 12.12,13

 If any ordinary man were so gathered into his people as king, the world would have no trouble understanding that he was now the acknowledged king of his people.  The truth of the kingship of Yeshua,  so clearly witnessed in the gospel record, so amply prophesied by generations of prophets and kings, is lost to the modern mind for two reasons: first, because so few people give him the rule over the heart by which they may come to know his great power, and, second, because of the perverse misrepresentations of a “church” which in the 4th century married itself to the existing temporal powers, denying the royal  claims even of its own king; an apostate church which for centuries would not even allow its people to possess or read the very Scriptures which are the foundation of faith; an evil hierarchical church which for most of its history has placed its own power and mandate over its adherents well ahead of their freedom to grow in the knowledge of God; a church which has brutally tortured and even murdered those who claimed that faith in God did not necessitate placing the ecclesiastical institution between themselves and the being of God;  a church claiming to conjure the being of God in a cup, claiming that a Pope has the authority of God, and claiming that its priests are “Alter Christus/Another Christ” thus presuming to have the authority to forgive sin! 

It is time for each person to own the truth, time to recognize the extent to which the truth of Jesus our king has been twisted and perverted by the church itself, not only in the centuries during which there was only Catholicism, but also by the churches which are heirs of the Reformation.

After the triumphal entry intoJerusalem, Jesus went up into the temple and drove the beneficiaries of the hierarchical church out of the temple, rebuking them:

Then he entered the temple area and began driving out those who were selling.  “It is written,” he said to them, “’My house will be a house of prayer.’ but you have made it ‘a den of robbers.’”                              Luke 19.45,46

Jesus then gathered his disciples into a second floor room to share in the Passover meal.  He taught them again that he would soon be leaving them, but that he would return in power. He washed their feet to show them that the royal road is the road of serving.  He taught them that he was going to die at the hands of a church which hated him for his challenge to their power. […The chief priests and the teachers of the law heard this …and began looking for a way to kill him, for they feared him, because the whole crowd was amazed at his teaching.  Mark 11.18]  He taught them that just as the king must go to the cross, so the subjects are destined to suffer for the kingdom until the day of glory:

If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.  If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world.  That is why the world hates you.  Remember the words I spoke to you: ‘No servant is greater than his master.’  If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also.                     John 15.18,19

He taught them that in going to join the Father on the throne of heaven he would make possible the presence of the Spirit of God with us who open our hearts to him.

“Unless I go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you….When he, the Spirit of truth, comes he will guide you into all truth.”                                                                                                         John 16.7,13

Finally, in the course of the Passover Feast, through the cup of blessing raised at dinner, he portrayed to them the covenant which he was about to seal with his own blood on the cross.

Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you.  This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.”                                                   Matthew 26.27,28

 At the end of his instruction, Jesus turned in prayer to God:

After Jesus said this, he looked toward heaven and prayed: “Father, the time has come.  Glorify your Son, that your Son may glorify you.  For you granted him authority over all people that he might give eternal life to all those you have given him.  Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus the anointed king whom you have sent.    John 17.1-3

Jesus concluded this great prayer for his people with the plea that we be able to know  him in all his power and glory: 

Father, I want those you have given me to be with me where I am, and to see my glory, the glory you have given me because you loved me before the creation of the world.                                                                John 17.24

The church would have you believe that this vision of the glory of our king is to be reserved for the end of time.  They would have you believe that he is not yet king.  The church would have you surround yourself with crucifixes.  They would have you watch him crucified day after day in the mass.  They would have you believe that he was a pitiful “candidate” for kingship and that he failed under the weight of Jewish rejection.  These are lies.  This is not what our king seeks for us!  He asks the Father that through the informing power of his Spirit we will know him in all his royal power and intimate healing love.

The cross is victory for us and the great victory of the love of our God, a love which gives leaven to the entire universe.  As king our Lord went to the cross, standing in for us his people, Israel.

Pilate then went back inside the palace, summoned Jesus and asked him, “Are you the king of the Jews?”    John 18.33

Jesus then spoke explicitly to him of our transcendent kingdom:

“My kingdom is not of this world.  If it were, my subjects would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews.  But now my kingdom is from another place.”

 “You are a king, then!” said Pilate. 

Jesus answered, “You are right in saying I am a king.  In fact for this reason I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth.”           John 18.36,37

For Yeshua, with all the character and being of God himself, it is inconceivable that he would allow himself to be sacrificed under a banner which was in any way hyperbole or falsehood.  The “church” however stands alongside the chief priests in this final account:

Here they crucified him…Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross.  It read: JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS.  Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Aramaic, Latin and Greek. The chief priests of the Jews protested to Pilate, “Do not write ‘The King of the Jews,’ but that this man claimed to be king of the Jews.”  Pilate answered, “What I have written, I have written.”                                 John 19.19-23

Near the close of his account, John writes,

“But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the anointed king, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.”  John 20.31

People like to respond that Jesus is only king in some “limited” “Spiritual” or metaphorical sense, since his kingship is noted in terms of “belief” and “having life”.  Such a credo is only evidence that such people are still stuck at the gates of the kingdom and have not yet found the will to open their hearts and discover his searching power and the noble experience of being his subject.  When the king truly begins to rule, then the austere and ponderous reality of the transcendent kingdom becomes overpowering and evident.


 The throne of David… the throne in the heavens

The throne of Jesus in the heavens is the seat of power which reaches to the core of life on earth, which reaches into the innermost heart of those who open to him, and this throne is the throne of David.

The people of Israel were created through covenant with God.  The earthly throne, and the earthly rule over Israel, beginning at the hand of the prophet Samuel, are the direct creation of God.  The true exercise of power from the earthly seat of David over Israel has always transpired in the knowledge that its authority, power, and validity lay in the throne of God and nowhere else.

When Solomon succeeded his father David to the throne it was clearly stated that he was being entrusted with the throne over Israel as guardian of a seat whose true locus of power is in heaven in the person and throne of God.  At that time, David said of Solomon,

“Of all my sons – and the Lord has given me many – he has chosen my son Solomon to sit on the throne of the kingdom of the Lord over Israel.”   I Chronicles 28.5

Jesus, as he was about to ascend to the throne of God,  made clear to his disciples the true form of his power, that as he sat on the throne in the heavens that power would reach through every turn of life on earth:

“All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.”   Matthew 28.18

Jesus, in the apocalyptic vision of Revelation, declared that his power, extending through heaven and earth, encloses within it the power of the Davidic throne, which is his true right and claim:

These are the words of the true Holy One, who holds the key of David, who opens  and none shall shut, who shuts and none shall open.    Revelation 3.7

To John, Jesus also declared repeatedly that, as in his life on earth, so in his universal power, he acts not in any way exclusive of the Father but always in total union with the Father:

“And the conqueror shall sit beside me on my throne as I myself have conquered   and sat down beside my Father on his throne.”                       Revelation 3.21

Between now and eternity there is no mention of any further anointing or coronation or change in the status of Yeshua, only that a day comes when Satan loses his prerogative in this world, and our king assumes the extended exercise of the power which is already in his hands:

Then the seventh angel blew; and loud voices followed in heaven, crying, “The rule of the world has passed to our Lord and his anointed king, and he shall reign forever and ever.”                                                                    Revelation 11.15  

 When he returns to earth in power and glory he has no need to pause for human “coronation.”  The centuries-old truth of his kingship is engraved upon him:

Then I saw heaven open wide – and there was a white horse!  His rider is faithful and true, yea, just are his judgments and his warfare; his eyes are a flame of fire, on his head are many diadems, he bears a written name which none knows but himself.  He is clad in a robe dipped in blood [his name is called THE LOGOS OF GOD], and the troops of heaven follow him on white horses, arrayed in pure white linen.  A sharp sword issues from his lips, wherewith to smite the nations; he will shepherd them with an iron flail, and trample the winepress of the passion of the wrath of God Almighty.         And on his robe, upon his thigh, his name is written, KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.                                                            Revelation 19.11-16

Between now and eternity it remains fact that Yeshua is on the heavenly throne with the Father, Yeshua and Yahveh bound in one seat of power, as denoted again so clearly at the end of the book of Revelation:

Then he showed me the river of the water of Life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb through the streets of the City;…the throne of God and the Lamb shall be within it.                         Revelation 21.1, 3

As always, as forever, the Lord our God, the Lord is One.


The heir to the throne of David…the witness of those who saw him on earth 

Simeon watched in Jerusalem for the coming of the anointed one, because it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he “would not die before he should see the Lord’s Messiah..”  Simeon, moved by the Spirit of God, took the infant Yeshua in his arms and sang out to God, saying,

“Sovereign Lord, as you have promised, you now dismiss your servant in peace.  For my eyes have seen your salvation, which you have prepared in the sight of all people, a light for revelation to the Gentiles and for glory to your people Israel.”                                    Luke 2.28-32

Zechariah, father of John the Baptist, prophetically described Yeshua as the one who would be king upon the throne of David and would bring into history the fulfillment of God’s promises to Abraham:

 “He has raised up a horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David….            …to remember his holy covenant, the oath he swore to our father Abraham: to rescue us from the hand of our enemies, and to enable us to serve him without fear in holiness and righteousness before him all our days.”                     Luke 1.69,72-75

The detailed genealogies in Matthew 1 and Luke 3 are both meant to document that the one whose profile is the center of Scripture is bound, by both earthly parents, to the lineage of David and destined to sit upon the throne of David.

When Jesus made his triumphal entry intoJerusalem,

…the crowds who went in front of him and who followed behind shouted,             ‘Hosanna to the Son of David!  Blessed be he who comes in the Lord’s name!        Hosanna in high heaven!’”                                            Mathew 21.9

The priests objected that children and disciples were hailing him as Messiah and heir to the throne of David, and said, “Teacher, rebuke your disciples!” To which Jesus replied,

“I tell you, if they keep quiet, the stones will cry out.”   Luke 19.40

The prophet Amos, in the 8th c. B.C., told Israel that Yahveh was about to punish the nation for its abandonment of its covenant, but he set out a fundamental sequence for the messianic future, recording the words of God declaring that through the coming of the messiah the throne of David would be restored, and that this then would be the foundation from which God would reach out to all nations.

Luke, in the book of Acts quotes James, the brother of Jesus, as he is speaking to an assembly of believers.  James quotes the following passage from the record of the prophet Amos in the process of asserting that Jesus, by his kingship, is accomplishing the long awaited restoration of the royal house of David, and that now on this basis they are reaching out beyond the nation state to the gentiles:

“After this I will return and rebuild David’s fallen tent.  Its ruins I will rebuild             and I will restore it, that the remnant of men may seek the Lord, and all the Gentiles who bear my name….”  Acts 15.16,17referring to Amos 9.11,12

Clearly the rebuilding of the house of David through the accession to the throne of the ultimate and eternal king is established here in prophecy as the ordained antecedent to the re-engineering of the kingdom by which we of the nations are called to the knowledge of the God of Israel.  It is this intended pattern which our king is calling out just before his ascension:

a.] “Full authority has been given to me in heaven and on earth;  b.] go and make disciples of all nations.”                                                               Matthew 28.18,19

The church’s denial of the kingship of Yeshua has been active since the 4th century and the evil fabrications of Constantine. Constantine did his best to replace the radical king of “a people apart” with a well dressed pantocrator and lord of the status quo, and then made himself the Vicar, the gentile Substitute, for that Lord…and in like manner the line of papal kings who descend from Constantine and usurp royalty.

The dispensationalist abandonment of the Messiah’s kingship has only left room for the fantasy that there might now be an actual Israel of God with a vacant throne, anxiously looking forward to “the one” who might occupy that throne.   In fact the powers of earth are making efficient use of the ignorance and apostasy of the church and are quite busily preparing for just such a day of deception when one of their own will make a great presentation of himself as the long awaited heir to the throne over all creation…which is the essence of the Dan Brown fantasies.  To them, however, will come the rude surprise that the throne of the Israel of God, the only Israel “of promise,” is already occupied.

For us, who have known his power in our lives and who know him as Lord over our historic and transcendent people, we know him and shall always know him as the fulfillment of every hope and as the indomitable Lord of history.



Standing openly in our faith, holding to the one who rules the heart, the one who rules his people

When our king first came to live on earth within the structures of national Israel and imperial Rome, he gave us an example of how the subject of the transcendent kingdom is to live within the fabric of the city of the world.  Not only did he refuse to be intimidated by the evil of their threats to destroy him.  He, for the sake of his people, ran into the breach, seeking the face of the evil, the very power of death, which confronted us, and set himself to suffer in our stead in order that we might go free.  This is the nature of our calling, to follow the example of our king, to discover and name and face the threats laid down by the city of the world as it closes the circle on all who serve the God of history above every other god.  By speaking out, we create space and opportunity for others to know the words and intentions of our God, to discover the One who seeks to know and love each one of us.   By remaining silent, we do nothing but assist the spread of darkness.

The great deception is a wound upon the truth.  The lies fathered by this deception have become a wound upon the victims of their perpetrators, chiefly, at this particular moment, upon the people of Palestine and the people of the Muslim countries attacked by the United States since 9/11/2001.

The great deception is a wound upon the heart of every person who shares John Newton’s love for the Zion from which flows a river of life for all mankind.   That Zion, ruled from the throne of God, is the eternal and transcendent City of God.  That river is the Spirit of God.

Is the world incapable of sensing the gravity of the misrepresentations being spread by the churches, whether Catholic or fundamentalist or liberal?  Are those who adhere to the Messiah of Israel incapable of sensing the gravity of the suffering which is spread around the world in the name of the “security” and “national interest” of the United Statesand Israel?  Let it be known by all people that the Israel of God has no national interest to be defended with armaments of any kind. Nor does it find its security in violent force.  

It is necessary that the people of God claim openly the Messiah of Israel as their king, claiming the transcendent Israel of promise as the kingdomof God.  The silence of the Israel of God only feeds the illusion in the Arab world that the policies of the United States and Israel, generally supported by the Christian and Jewish communities, are somehow an expression of the character of the God of Israel.  This then stands to obstruct their vision of the true being of Yeshua.

The love of God as expressed through Yeshua is the call of God to all mankind to come to him and be his people alone.  We are not called to be Christians.  We are not called to be Jews.  We are not called to be Muslims.  We are called to open our hearts intimately to Yeshua alone.  In the process we are liberated from every false standard and are called to stand in the truth, to claim the transcendent kingdom of God as our own, to discover ourselves as members of the true people of God — true heirs of the promises to Abraham.

Behold, I stand at the door and knock; if anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and sup with him and he with me.  The conqueror I will allow to sit beside me on my throne as I myself have conquered and sat down beside my Father on his throne.                                                                                    Revelation 3.19,20,21

*    *    *

Post Script

We have entered a time when the people of the world are compelled by their overlords to accept and live within mythologies.  Through fear of losing social status and economic security, through distraction, through ignorance and apathy, popular acceptance of these mythologies furnishes to government the freedom to carry out in plain view programs to which, normally, outside the mythology, we would object.

For the West, “the great danger of international terror” is the prime mythology of the moment.  It has facilitated our aggression into the Muslim world.  Our government knows the truth of what happened on September 11, 2001.  It could not have been carried out without the cooperation of people at the highest level.  The massive evidence which discredits the official mythology is available for all to consider.

We must observe that until the government of the  United States is ready to cast off this mythology and share the truth with its people, there is no ground for expectation of reasonable honest relations between the government and its people.  Every day in which our leaders rise to perpetuate the mythology is one more day without respect for the people of this country.  Our leaders betray us.

In the same vein let it be remarked that the followers of Yeshua, Jew and gentile, have allowed themselves to be lulled to sleep by the self-serving mythologies of the church and the synagogue.

In the first few centuries of the Christian era, during that short period before the installation of the state-sanctioned hierarchical church, followers of Yeshua greeted each other with the phrase, Jesus is Lord.  For them it was the core assertion that Yeshua is the anointed king, the long awaited Messiah of Israel.  Public identification with this core loyalty cost them their lives: it was an offense to Rome.  Rome needed to preserve the mythology that Israel is nothing more than a genetic group, whose leaders are bound within the sphere of Roman political power. Rome could not tolerate the thought that Israel should be a power outside its control with a king beyond its control, a king who is also God, who holds his people to a call above the call of Roman power.

The radical enthusiasm and power of New Covenant Israel which fully survived the physical destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. by Rome — this enthusiasm and power enjoyed by Jew and Gentile together in a new Israel of God — this was subsumed and rendered tame by Constantine and his Roman state religion.  Constantine flattered bishops, bought them off with basilicas, made himself the gracious arbiter of their theological differences, and married the filthy whole to the times and practices of his national pagan religion.

The comfort of modern religious life within the status quo is not due to some advanced condition that the modern Rome is more tolerant.  The comfort of the modern religious institution is due to the fact that it has given away the core being and the core assertion of the dissenting kingdom and in its stead has settled into a faith with purely personal dimensions and ramifications.

This private “iPod” sort of faith will never be an offense to Rome.  Under the modern mythology of Tolerance you may believe whatever fantastical thing you want to believe about Jesus or any imaginary God, so long as it has no implications beyond your own personal being, so long as it suggests no political imperative which might be a challenge to the authority ofRome.

But the time of the witness, the time of the martyr, is at hand.  Only a handful of nations stand in the way of the completion of globalization.  Rome will soon raise its standard, claiming authority over the whole earth.  Unless we are ready to give away our humanity, it will be necessary in this time to speak the truth that Rome does not want to hear: We who belong to the Messiah of Israel are the polis of God, true children of Abraham, not one of the nations.  We are the great and eternal political imperative of God.

[1] Genesis 17.1-8

[2] Romans 11.25-32

[3] As, equally, there can be no true Islam apart from submission to the God of Abraham, apart from which Mohammed’s prophetic mission makes no sense at all.

[4] It is the presence of the Spirit of God in the human heart which furnishes the heart with the love of God’s law, thus the fulfillment of the prophecy of  Jeremiah.  The broad provision of the Holy Spirit to the people of God was dependent upon the agency of our king to redeem us at the cross, to rise from the dead, and to return to the Father.  Jesus instructed his disciples beforehand:  “I am going to the Father….I will ask the Father to give you another Helper to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth: the world cannot receive him, because it neither sees nor knows him, but you know him, because he remains with you and will be within you.  I will not leave you forlorn; I am coming to you.”  John 14.12, 15-18 Moffatt translation.

[5] Matthew 3.8,9,11

[6] It should be noted that the reference here is to Passover.  In the Scriptures we find that God, through Moses, commanded that Passover is one of three festivals to be celebrated forever, but insteadConstantine abandons Passover and fabricates Easter along pagan lines.

[7] Nor is it only the political right in service toIsrael.  Through the power of AIPAC there is little that happens inWashington, right or  left, Senate or House, Executive or Judicial, outside the bounds of their approval.

[8] Genesis 49.10

[9] Numbers 24.17